us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 1000D Digital Rebel XS



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 1000D Digital Rebel XS

Testseek.com have collected 109 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 1000D Digital Rebel XS and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 1000D Digital Rebel XS.
Award: Good Buy July 2008
July 2008
 
(79%)
109 Reviews
Users
(92%)
25 Reviews
79 0 100 109

The editors liked

  • Great results even with default settings
  • Good tonal response and dynamic range
  • Picture styles provides good control over image output (and prove consistent across models)
  • Typical Canon CMOS noise-free images
  • Remain detailed even at high sensitivities...
  • Very good photo quality
  • With minimal noise
  • Compact body by DSLR standards (though its not for everyone)
  • Good kit lens
  • With image stabilization
  • Dust reduction system
  • Fast performance in most respects
  • Live view with contrast detect AF
  • Magnificat...
  • Rebel XSi performance for less bucks
  • Fantastic
  • Reliable AF system
  • Extremely clean highISO shots
  • More processing options than you could possibly need
  • 10.1-megapixel sensor with low noise and good detail
  • Live View mode works well
  • Live View mode offers a choice between phase-detect and contrast-detect modes
  • Zoom in five or ten times with Live View
  • Image-stabilized kit lens is excellent optically
  • ...
  • The design of this camera makes it easy and more comfortable to use
  • Solid build despite lightweight plastic construction
  • Relatively easy to use
  • And is responsive and reliable
  • Good quality kit lens and good results
  • Very good image quality
  • Fast focusing and shot-to-shot speeds
  • Automatic sensor-cleaning system
  • Intuitive interface
  • Great results even with auto settings
  • Images remain detailed even at high ISO
  • Lots of external shortcut controls
  • Excellent photo quality for its class
  • Solid performance.
  • Live view
  • Lightweight
  • Speedy operation
  • Good high ISO performance
  • Good image quality
  • Image quality up with the best 10 Mpixel DSLRs
  • Accurate Live View with contrast-AF option
  • Kit includes stabilised lens
  • PC remote control software supplied.

The editors didn't like

  • Continuous shooting ability in RAW very limited (small buffer and low speed)
  • Average automatic white balance performance
  • Still very poor under incandescent light
  • Comparatively small viewfinder
  • Limited exposure compensation range (+/- 2.0 EV)
  • Live vie...
  • Rebel XSi only costs a little more
  • Small
  • Slippery right hand grip
  • Very slow contrast detect AF in live view mode
  • Nearly useless in low light
  • Live view not available in all shooting modes
  • LCD and optical viewfinder both on the small side
  • Sluggish...
  • Build quality not great
  • Kit lens is of average quality
  • Auto white balance struggles at times
  • Live view less than useful
  • AF-assist adjustment and Flash Exposure compensation are buried in the Flash Settings menu
  • In Live View Quick AF mode
  • Camera does not tell you which AF points are in focus
  • Kit lens produces somewhat high barrel distortion at wide angle
  • Flash cover...
  • The Live View feature is difficult to use and the picture on the screen is not what you see through the viewfinder.
  • Over-priced compared to closest rivals
  • Activating Live View requires detective work
  • Light sensitivity settings offered could be higher still
  • Relatively small LCD
  • Fewer manual options than other entry-level DSLRs
  • Live View settings difficult to access
  • No ISO 3200
  • Compare Prices
  • The Canon EOS Rebel XS is the manufacturer's cheapest DSLR camera
  • And it is very much aimed as a "first DSLR" camera for photographers looking to advance beyond the typical point and shoot
  • It's $200 cheaper than Canon's next step up camera
  • The Rebel T2i
  • And it lacks some of the features that makes the T2i such a good camera. But is it a good beginner's camera?
  • Maximum ISO of 1600
  • No spot meter
  • Annoying
  • In-viewfinder
  • Focus-point display.
  • Overpriced
  • Noticeably plastic build
  • Slow live view focussing
  • No video
  • Live View not as fuss-free as Sony A300
  • Screen fixed in position
  • Unlike A300
  • Slow RAW continuous shooting
  • Some features downgraded from 400D / XTi.
  • Ergonomics and finish
  • Value for money
  • Menu infrastructure
  • Small buffer
  • Some WB issues.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-09-09, review by: gadgetguy.com.au

  • Live View; Rapid continuous shooting speed.
  • No video mode.
  • A well-balanced camera, the EOS 1000D feels good in the hand and is so easy to use you may have to fight off younger family members for shooting rights.As for quality, if youve never used a camera with a larger image sensor youll be surprised at the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-08-28, review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • The picture quality is excellent, especially when a better quality Canon lens is fitted. Dynamic range is wide and the Auto Lighting Optimiser is useful in tricky situations, such as backlighting. Auto focus and exposure are very fast and accurate. Res...
  • The “live view” is ridiculous. The user guide recommends manual focussing in live view and yet Canon claim that they include the function because compact camera owners trading up to a DSLR demand it. But when they find that by holding the came...
  • Stupid gimmicks apart, this is a good way to buy into a system than will grow with the user’s expertise. And when the time comes to move up to a better body the Canon lenses will still be in the bag to use on the new camera. And as decent lenses gen...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-08-25, review by: smh.com.au

  • Abstract:  Canon EOS 1000D If you want to progress from taking snaps of friends in front of the Harbour Bridge to stunning pictures of the bridge itself, then you need to dispense with your compact camera and buy a digital SLR. SLR, by the way, stands for si...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-11, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Sharp pictures, fast operation, Live View, dust reduction
  • Focus in live view still takes some time, menu can be unclear
  • Another wonderful entry-level camera from Canon, the 1000D combines all the latest features — including Live View, dust reduction and lens-based stabilisation — with superb picture quality to produce an extremely appealing package. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-01, Author: Margaret , review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Replacing the popular EOS 400D at the entry level of Canons DSLR range, the EOS 1000D brings yet another level to Canons DSLR nomenclature, reflecting the days of film, when Canons lowest-priced SLR cameras had four-figure model names. The 1000D has...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(88%)
 
  Published: 2008-06-10, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Abstract:  With an aim to make digital SLR photography more accessible, Canon today announced the EOS 1000D, which will replace entry-level 400D, and includes new features seen in the 450D and 40D. Given its long-lived success, its not that surprising its taken...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-02-07, review by: Photoradar.com

  • With this being a basic model aimed at budding photographer looking for an introduction to DSLR photography, the Canon EOS 1100D was never intended to set the world on fire with new technology. The improvements Canon has made internally to this Canon 1...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-10, Author: Dave , review by: theregister.co.uk

  • The 1000D is a fantastic camera, packed with features and enviably upgradeable. For beginners, the Nikon D3000's on-screen help system will surely win out. And, while the 1000D's test images suggest marginally better high-ISO performance than the D3000, t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-01, review by: digitalartsonline.co.uk

  • Good quality
  • Live View initially buried; max ISO could be higher; no inbody stabilisation

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-02-27, review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Good quality consistent results using kit lens; easy to use and solidly built; fair value when bought with image-stabilised zoom
  • Live View initially buried; max ISO could be higher; no in-body stabilisation

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 4 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×