us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 40D



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 40D

Testseek.com have collected 97 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 40D and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 40D.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2008
January 2008
 
(86%)
97 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
86 0 100 97

The editors liked

  • Durable and rugged design
  • Large 3inch LCD
  • EOS Integrated Cleaning System for sensor cleaning
  • Noise is barely noticeable at high ISO levels
  • Amazing image quality.
  • 6.5 fps burst List price sRAW Live Preview Highlight Tone Priority Reorganized menus Wireless capabilities Constant display of ISO in viewfinder .95x viewfinder Interchangeable focusing screens Dust reduction Additional weather-seals Silent modes (good...
  • Excellent 10.1 megapixel sensor with impressively low noise and superb detail ISO 100 to 800 usable at 13x19 inches Dust removal technology reduces sensor cleaning chores Excellent kit lens 3.0-inch LCD Status display includes more detail Print/Share b...
  • Handling
  • Image quality
  • Ease of use
  • Good dust removal system and prevention
  • AF
  • Great colour and white balance
  • Low noise
  • Good software.
  • Excellent image quality. Comfortable
  • Solid body. Live View LCD mode. Complete manual controls and customization.
  • Generally superior shooting speed among dSLRs
  • First-rate photo quality.
  • Good 10-megapixel images
  • Amazing 6.5 fps burst mode
  • Large 3-inch LCD
  • Excellent resolution
  • Good per-pixel sharpness
  • Good tonal response
  • Dynamic range extended compared to competition
  • EOS 30D
  • Highlight tone priority option delivers even more dynamic range with very little downside
  • Trademark Canon CMOS noise free images...
  • Excellent photo quality
  • Big
  • Bright LCD
  • Live View shooting
  • Peppy sequential shooting modes
  • Great interface with re-defined menu structure
  • Nice customization features
  • Good live view implementation
  • Custom modes.
  • Fast
  • Capable of 6.5 frames per second
  • Produced pleasing
  • Wellbalanced images
  • Superb handling and 6.5fps shooting
  • Great build & improved weatherproofing
  • Live View and PC remote control
  • Effective anti-dust during our test period.
  • Build quality
  • 6.5fps
  • 3in LCD screen
  • Image detail

The editors didn't like

  • Live View mode only works in manual modes and only with manual focus.
  • Reassigned buttons on top of camera Non-customizable Picture Styles and Direct Print buttons Silent modes are not as quiet as expected Lacks body-based image stabilization No commander flash mode
  • Bigger than predecessors AF assist lamp only works in flash-on mode
  • Making available light photography more difficult (somewhat offset by the improved AF sensor) Auto-rotation doesnt play well with all computer programs Kit lens doesnt really reach ...
  • Over crowded buttons
  • Fussy button/dial combinations
  • Metering foibles.
  • Noise creeps into extremeISO photos. Can’t use Live View or RAW formats in auto modes.
  • Large spot size for spot meter
  • Relatively sluggish low-light focus.
  • Heavy
  • Gets noisy above 800 ISO
  • Live View—I still don’t get it
  • Average automatic white balance performance
  • Still very poor under incandescent light
  • Picture Style tone curve not indicated in camera menu (contrast is an offset
  • Not absolute)
  • Continuous shooting rate slower than specified
  • 6 fps @ 1/500 sec
  • 6.3 fps...
  • Confusing controls
  • Manual focusing in Live View
  • Limited auto-bracketing
  • Inconvenient power switch
  • Lacks some advanced features and customization options.
  • Live View mode is kludgy
  • Resolution not a big step-up
  • Default settings benefit from sharpening
  • Screen doesn’t have VGA resolution
  • No HDMI port and tough rivals.
  • Some handling issues
  • Low resolution LCD screen

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 9 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-11-02, review by: Cnet.de

  • berragende Aufnahmegeschwindigkeit, erstklassige Fotoqualität
  • zu großes Messfeld bei Spotmessung, langsamer Fokus bei schlechten Lichtverhältnissen
  • Erstklassige Fotoqualität und eine beeindruckende Aufnahmeleistung machen die EOS 40D zu einer empfehlenswerten Kamera....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2007-11-01, review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  Bei preiswerten Spiegelreflex-Kameras setzte die „Canon EOS 400D“ Maßstäbe. Mit der „EOS 40D“ stellte der Hersteller jetzt ein neues Modell für anspruchsvolle Amateure vor. Schafft es auch diese Kamera zum Klassenprimus? AUDIO V...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-10-11, review by: digitalkamera.de

  • Die Canon EOS 40D leistet sich nur wenige Schwächen, bietet aber durchaus noch Verbesserungspotential wie z. B. einen Kontrast-Autofokus im LiveView-Modus, der ohne kurzzeitiges Herunterklappen des Spiegels auskommt. Ansonsten ist es eine hervorragend...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-21, review by: avguide.ch

  • Fest im Griff: Ein stabiles Gehäuse und gute Bedienelemente machen die Kamera Top!Die EOS 40D gehört mit seinen 740 Gramm nicht zu den leichtesten Kameras, dafür liegt sie sehr gut in der Hand und das Gehäuse ist gegen Staub und Feuchtigkeit ausreichen...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-17, review by: letsgodigital.org/nl/

  • In de zeven modellen van EOS D30 tot en met 40D is heel wat veranderd. De beeldsensor en processor zijn met sprongen vooruitgegaan en ook de DSLR camera zelf is sterk verbeterd. Kun je nog voorstellen dat je met een 1,8-inch scherm achterop de camera helemaal blij was...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(84%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-15, review by: prylportalen.se

  • Abstract:  Text och foto: Magnus FröderbergTRENDEN ÄR att kamerorna i den övre konsumentklassen, även kallat det semi-professionella segmentet, får allt proffsigare funktioner. Bildkvaliteten är inte nödvändigtvis bät...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-01-01, review by: fotoguiden.se

  • Abstract:  att kamerorna i den övre konsumentklassen, även kallat det semi-professionella segmentet, får allt proffsigare funktioner. Bildkvaliteten är inte nödvändigtvis bättre än hos de billigare modellerna, utan det är proffsigare funktioner man betalar för.Nä...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(86%)
 
  Published: 2007-12-27, review by: datormagazin.se

  • Bildkvalitet, konstruktionskvalitet, enkel att använda, hanterbart format
  • Bildkvaliteten bara marginellt bättre än föregångarens
  • Den som söker en digital systemkamera med näst intill professionell prestanda till ett för konsumenter överkomligt pris ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-30, review by: smartson.se

  • Abstract:  Testarna anser att Eos 40D är en klar uppgradering från tidigare modeller, både snabbare och bättre design. Bildkvaliteten är hög.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-01, review by: ljudochbild.se

  • Abstract:  Vid första anblicken är det inte så lätt att se vad som är så speciellt med nya EOS 40D. Efterföljaren till EOS 30D ser inte ut att skilja sig nämnvärt från föregångaren. Knappar och reglage är placerade på nästan samma ställen, skärmen är visserligen ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
    page 9 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×