us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 5D Mark 3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark 3

Testseek.com have collected 212 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 5D Mark 3 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 5D Mark 3.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2012
April 2012
 
(90%)
212 Reviews
Users
(96%)
759 Reviews
90 0 100 212

The editors liked

  • Advertisement
  • First and foremost
  • The 5D Mark III takes beautiful photos
  • And improves on a camera that was already fantastic. The small changes on its body make the Mark III even more comfortable to use
  • While the tweaks made to button placement and the
  • Manual audio gain control
  • Headphone jack
  • Superb lowlight performance
  • 30minute maximum record time
  • Improved rolling shutter
  • Improved overall image quality
  • Better HD video quality and more robust feature set
  • More comfortable and durable
  • Weatherresistant camera build
  • Faster 6 fps burst speed
  • Vastly improved autofocus system
  • Very high resolution
  • Great image quality
  • Excellent hue accuracy
  • Superb high ISO performance
  • Real-time chromatic aberration and corner shading compensation
  • Good 24 x 36-inch prints from ISO 100-1
  • 600
  • ISO 102
  • 400 shots produce a good 4 x 6-inch pri...
  • Compact for a full-frame SLR. 22-megapixel resolution. Large optical viewfinder. Bright
  • High-res rear LCD. Fast autofocus. 6fps continuous shooting. Excellent high ISO performance. 1080p video recording.
  • The Canon EOS 5D Mark III offers a more streamlined shooting design
  • Significantly updated feature set with more configurability
  • Plus better performance over its predecessor. It maintains its excellent photo and video quality as well
  • Very low image noise
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Very accurate colors
  • Good automatic whitebalance
  • Spectacular subject tracking autofocus
  • Lightning fast autofocus
  • Full choice of exposure modes for movies
  • Classleading continuous buffer
  • Large viewfinde
  • Excellent photo/video quality
  • Excellent build quality
  • Advanced 61 point AF system
  • Speed
  • Features
  • Accuracy
  • Video
  • Incamera HDR (High Dynamic Range) feature combines three shots into one image with better exposure. “Silent” shooting mode helps capture stealthy candid portraits. Rank photos incamera with 15 stars
  • Then carry those ratings over to Adobe Lightroom
  • Adobe Bridge and Apple Aperture. Same 61point (41crosstypepoint) autofocus system as topoftheline Canon 1D X
  • Super fast and accurate 61 point AF system
  • Upgraded iFCL metering system better captures off-center subjects
  • Great low light opportunities thanks to expanded ISO range
  • Good resolution and detail in raw files
  • Good color and tonality across the ISO range
  • Reliable metering even in difficult contrast situations
  • Very responsive and snappy operation
  • Thanks to new Digic 5+ processor
  • 6 frames per second continuous shooting with good buffering
  • Excellent build-quality with magnesium shell and weather-sealing
  • Intuitive user interface and good ergonomics with larg
  • Great photo and video quality with low noise at high sensitivities
  • Powerful 61-point AF system with easy presets
  • Large viewfinder with 100% coverage and detailed 3
  • 2 screen
  • 6fps continuous shooting
  • Good ergonomics
  • Build quality and twin card slots.
  • Excellent set of features
  • Buildquality is much better than MkII
  • AF system and overall performance

The editors didn't like

  • Advertisement
  • Given how popular the 5D Mark II became in the videography community
  • We'd have liked to have seen the Mark III's video capabilities improved a bit more. The addition of a dedicated XLR microphone jack is probably a pipe drea
  • No uncompressed video out
  • Sluggish autofocus in liveview mode
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model
  • Starting price nearly $1
  • 000 higher than predecessor
  • Builtin mic only offers mono sound
  • Price
  • $3
  • 499
  • Www.usa.canon.com
  • Dynamic range not as good as competitors (deep shadow noise is rather high in raw files)
  • Auto and Incandescent white balance are quite warm in typical indoor lighting
  • Default noise reduction a bit high
  • Loses detail even at low ISOs
  • Flattens subtle ...
  • Expensive. Slow focus in Live View and Video modes. No built-in flash. Not compatible with EF-S lenses
  • JPEG photos at low ISO sensitivities don't match the generally excellent level of quality that you can otherwise get out of this camera
  • Underexposes often
  • Expanded ISO of limited use
  • Low rear control dial
  • Rear dial prone to accidental changes
  • Complex interaction between AF and lenses
  • Slow instant review
  • Slow to poweroff due to sensor cleaning
  • Best image quality from Raw (vs. JPEG)
  • Overly aggressive noise reduction
  • Monaural onboard microphone
  • Share & EnjoyTweet Author
  • Daniel m. east
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model. Starting price nearly $1
  • 000 higher than predecessor. Builtin mic only offers mono sound.
  • Noise can get pretty noticeable in the higher end of the ISO range
  • AF system is complicated and has a steep learning curve
  • Destructive noise reduction results in mushy JPEGs
  • Even at base ISO
  • Visible sharpening artifacts at default settings
  • Heavy-handed noise reduction leads to lack of low-contrast detail at higher ISOs
  • Distortion correction not available 'on the fly'
  • Built-in microphone only monaural
  • Soft video output with less dynamic range than stills
  • No built-in AF illuminator
  • No built-in flash or wireless controller
  • No built-in Wifi or GPS. Both are expensive accessories
  • No articulated screen
  • No interval timer
  • No movie crop mode
  • No clean HDMI
  • No continuous movie AF
  • 36 Megapixel Nikon D800 available for less.
  • Expensive compared to some rivals.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-06-01, review by: wired.com

  • Incamera HDR (High Dynamic Range) feature combines three shots into one image with better exposure. “Silent” shooting mode helps capture stealthy candid portraits. Rank photos incamera with 15 stars, then carry those ratings over to Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Bridge and Apple Aperture. Same 61point (41crosstypepoint) autofocus system as topoftheline Canon 1D X,
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model. Starting price nearly $1,000 higher than predecessor. Builtin mic only offers mono sound.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-05-23, review by: buy-n-shoot.com

  • The Canon 5D started out as an affordable high quality full frame alternative. It evolved phenomenally in a single upgrade when the Mk II arrived offering more functionality, raising the bar on image capture quality and the big one, the introductio...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-05-03, Author: Lori , review by: cnet.com

  • The Canon EOS 5D Mark III offers a more streamlined shooting design, significantly updated feature set with more configurability, plus better performance over its predecessor. It maintains its excellent photo and video quality as well
  • JPEG photos at low ISO sensitivities don't match the generally excellent level of quality that you can otherwise get out of this camera
  • While it's not a no-brainer upgrade over the Mark II, the Canon EOS 5D Mark III is worth the price premium if better performance and configurability matter to you.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-30, Author: Jeremy , review by: camcorderinfo.com

  • With the 5D Mark III, Canon addressed many of the issues that video users complained about with the previous 5D Mark II. The camera is loaded with manual video controls, has a whole slew of different compression and frame rate options, and it has ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(93%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-18, Author: Jim , review by: pcmag.com

  • Compact for a full-frame SLR. 22-megapixel resolution. Large optical viewfinder. Bright, high-res rear LCD. Fast autofocus. 6fps continuous shooting. Excellent high ISO performance. 1080p video recording.
  • Expensive. Slow focus in Live View and Video modes. No built-in flash. Not compatible with EF-S lenses
  • The Canon EOS 5D Mark III looks a lot like its predecessor on the outside, but offers plenty of improvements under the hood. It's a solid option for advanced shooters with an investment in Canon glass, but doesn't match the rapid-fire shooting capabiliti...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-18, review by: videomaker.com

  • Abstract:  Spotlight - Canon 5D Mark III DSLR CameraCanon seems to do so many things right when it comes to video on their DSLRs and the 5D Mark III is the next "right" camera. Start with 22MP, a 35mm full-frame CMOS sensor, EF mount lenses, 1920x1080 video at 30p, ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-12, Author: jmeyer , review by: digitalcameraworld.com

  • Abstract:  Canon's EOS 5D Mark III has a lot to live up to. For a start, the original Canon EOS 5D was the first DSLR to really bring full-frame digital photography within the reach of enthusiast photographers. Then came its replacement, the Canon EOS 5D Mark II, wh...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-11, review by: photographyblog.com

  • The Canon EOS 5D Mark III builds on the success of its popular predecessor with a series of improvements that add up to a much better all-round camera for stills and video alike. The 61-point auto-focus system in particular is very welcome, along with...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-06, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Let's compare the technical performance of the Nikon D4, D800, (same sensor and performance as the ), and , ......

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-05, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Excellent set of features, buildquality is much better than MkII, AF system and overall performance
  • Expensive compared to some rivals.
  • While the MkII was more suited to specific photographic disciplines, the MkIII is a whole different ball game.Its a much more well-rounded, versatile DSLR than its predecessor. This is thanks to the boost in performance - namely the AF, while the quali...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(92%)
    page 4 of 22 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×