us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS / IXUS 95 IS



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS / IXUS 95 IS

Testseek.com have collected 42 expert reviews of the Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS / IXUS 95 IS and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS / IXUS 95 IS.
Award: Recommended July 2009
July 2009
 
(76%)
42 Reviews
Users
(92%)
111 Reviews
76 0 100 42

The editors liked

  • Small and sleek
  • Many color options
  • Great Autofocus performance
  • Good megapixeltoCCD range
  • ISO settings perform well
  • Behold! It has an optical viewfinder!
  • Good incamera photo editing options
  • An abundance of automatic settings
  • Lightweight but sturdy
  • Fast to respond to buttons
  • Easy to use
  • Low noise
  • Attractive
  • Ultracompact design
  • Easy operation
  • Well-rounded
  • Basic feature set.
  • Compact
  • Slim design
  • Good image quality in automatic mode.
  • Solid design. Good feature set for beginners. Viewfinder. Good low light. ...
  • Good image quality in automatic mode
  • Light and stylish
  • Decent picture quality
  • Small but useful optical viewfinder
  • Scene recognition make it easy to use.
  • Excellent auto flash
  • Good macro mode
  • Viewfinder
  • Well exposed images
  • Smart Auto
  • Image Stabilisation

The editors didn't like

  • Still has an optical viewfinder
  • Sacrificing space
  • Mode picking is hard to find within interface
  • LCD screen does not repel scratches and smudges as advertised
  • Magnified images show graininess and noise
  • May be too small for those with large hands
  • Virtually no manual controls
  • Pink color is too lurid (though there are other options)
  • Pricey given its features
  • Full manual on CD only
  • Photo quality dips above ISO 200
  • Flat buttons can be difficult to press accurately.
  • Image quality suffers above ISO 200
  • Viewfinder is too small to actually use.
  • Some instances where the camera will produce mediocre images. No change from last year’s SD1100 IS aside from hardware upgrades. ...
  • Viewfinder is too small to actually use
  • Basic 3x zoom range
  • Tiny optical viewfinder
  • Red-eye sometimes a problem
  • No optical zoom while filming.
  • No full manual mode or focus
  • Viewfinder is approximate to view
  • ISO 1600 is noisy
  • Limited lens range (wider and longer would be an improvement)

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-04-24, review by: gadgetrepublic.com

  • Abstract:  The Ixus 95 IS is a mid-priced compact digital in a modern, lightweight design with plenty of features to keep the casual photographer snap-happy.Canon's Digital Ixus line is not short on options: there are 15 different compact digitals to choose from,...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-08-29, review by: firstpost.com

  • Good ISO performance, Nice Macro mode, Great looks/build quality/portability, Decent Image Quality
  • Night modes not up to the mark
  • The IXUS 95 IS comes with a CCD sensor that takes shots of up to 10 megapixel. The sensor does a decent job since image quality is quite good, and details are captured pretty well. Color reproduction and auto-white balance were accurate too.The camera...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-07-08, review by: ld2.ciol.com

  • Awesome design, great snaps, good value
  • Too noisy at ISO200 and above

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2010-04-08, review by: erenumerique.fr

  • Abstract:  A condition de renoncer au grand angle et aux utilisations très pointues, le Canon Ixus 95IS est un très bon choix pour s'équiper d'un appareil agréable à utiliser comme à regarder.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-03-18, review by: bestofmicro.com

  • Abstract:  Naturellement, l'Ixus 95IS est avant tout un appareil automatique même si un certain nombre de réglages sont disponibles. En pratique, le 95IS procure de très bonnes images ..

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: testnumerique.fr

  • Bonne qualité d'image, Ergonomie et agrément d'usage, Esthétique,
  • Pas de grand angle, Limites en haute sensibilité

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-09-08, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Interface agréable, Réactivité générale, Qualité d'image en basse sensibilité, Automatismes efficaces
  • Construction en retrait des autres Ixus, Style pataud, Absence de grandangle, Vidéo limitée
  • Canon signe un compact remarquablement banal, à la construction correcte et à la fiche technique ordinaire. On peine à lui trouver des défauts, mais il n'a pas non plus de qualité particulière : le contrat est rempli, sans plus....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-08-27, review by: betabuzz.de

  • einfache Bedienung, gute Bildqualität, kompaktes, hochwertiges Gehäuse
  • kaum manuelle Einstellungsmöglichkeiten, deutliches Bildrauschen ab ISO 400, zu flache Tasten
  • Mit der Canon IXUS 95 IS erhalten Sie eine ansprechende Marken-Digitalkamera für relativ wenig Geld. Unter guten Lichtverhältnissen wird Sie der DIGIC 4-Bildprozessor nicht enttäuschen: Die Aufnahmen wirken scharf und nicht zuletzt dank der sehr guten...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(73%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-24, review by: magnus.de

  • Die Canon Ixus 95IS kostet 20 Euro weniger als die 100IS und verzichtet im Gegenzug auf das superschlanke Gehäuse, die HD-Videofunktion und den HDMI-Ausgang. Dass sie nur 10 statt 12 Megapixel mitbringt, hat keine Bedeutung: Im Messlabor bewies sie so...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(68%)
 
  Published: 2009-08-04, review by: Cnet.de

  • attraktives, kompaktes Design, einfache Bedienung, bietet alle grundlegenden Funktionen
  • nachlassende Bildqualität ab ISO 200, flache Tasten bieten schlechte Haptik
  • Die einfach zu bedienende und attraktive Canon Ixus 95 IS ist eine ausgezeichnete Kamera für die Hosentasche. Allerdings sollten Fotografen nicht zu hohe Anforderungen an die Bildqualität stellen....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
    page 4 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×