us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Fujifilm FinePix X100S



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Fujifilm FinePix X100S

Testseek.com have collected 107 expert reviews of the Fujifilm FinePix X100S and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm FinePix X100S.
Award: Most Awarded June 2013
June 2013
 
(86%)
107 Reviews
Users
(90%)
37 Reviews
86 0 100 107

The editors liked

  • Fantastic SLRlike image quality
  • Even at high ISOs
  • Nifty hybrid viewfinder
  • Cool look
  • The Fujifilm X100S produces excellent photos
  • And an updated viewfinder adds to the camera's increasingly streamlined shooting design
  • Attractive
  • Retro rangefinderstyle design
  • Improved (excellent) still image quality that's even better thanks to second generation XTrans sensor technology
  • Great
  • Sharp f/2 35mmequivalent lens
  • Overall better operation and performance than the X100
  • Addi
  • Hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder. Superb high ISO image quality. 35mm wide-angle field of view. Fast f/2 lens. Excellent control layout. Fast focus. Continuous shooting at 5fps. X-Trans image sensor. Wide-angle adapter available.
  • Class leading image quality
  • Significantly faster autofocus performance
  • Small and light body
  • Excellent build quality
  • Builtin ND filter
  • Leaf shutter lets you sync flashes at a super high speed
  • Superb image quality in compact size
  • Extremely low noise
  • Very good sharpness from wideopen
  • Flexible rendition of colors and tones
  • Bright F/2 lens
  • Real aperture ring
  • LeafShutter allows HighSpeedSync
  • BuiltIn 3Stop ND Filter
  • Plenty of external contro
  • Hybrid optical and electronic viewfinder with exposure and focus area overlay
  • Highquality lens
  • Fast
  • Sharp and hardly any optical flaws
  • Excellent image quality at low ISOs
  • Responsive in most shooting modes (unless you're brack
  • Pretty looks
  • Fast autofocus
  • Great image quality
  • Hybrid viewfinder
  • Compact size. Amazing photo quality. You look cool using it
  • Superior 16MP stills
  • Excellent Hybrid viewfinder
  • Very responsive
  • 16MPX X-Trans CMOS sensor
  • Fast Hybrid AF with manual focus aids
  • Hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
  • Bright f2 35mm equivalent fixed lens
  • Excellent high ISO noise performance.
  • Superb lens and sensor combination
  • Handling characteristics
  • Premium feel

The editors didn't like

  • It's expensive
  • Fuji's menu system is less intuitive than alternatives
  • The lens has a few quirks
  • As does the autofocus system
  • Lowlight AF slow and inconsistent
  • Video quality
  • Even at 60p
  • Compromised by moire and lack of image stabilization
  • Combined fourway pad/Command dial means AF control points cumbersome to change
  • Too easy to bump control dials and change settings acciden
  • Bigger than some other large-sensor compacts. Lens suffers from edge softness. Macro shots at wide apertures have a soft-focus look. Video could be better. No image stabilization. Rear LCD could be sharper
  • The flash has some seriously weak game
  • Very slow autofocus in lowlight
  • Some overexposure
  • Some cast under tungsten lighting
  • Wrong LiveHistogram
  • Based on display
  • Not ExposurePriority
  • Clear but pointless OVF
  • Two dials needed per exposure parameter
  • No AEL with MF
  • Illogical and underused b
  • Image quality less than what is achievable from an APSC sensor
  • No shake reduction
  • Slow and somewhat inaccurate autofocus
  • LCD smallish and of low resolution by today's standards
  • Shutter speeds can't go lower that 1/4 s in autoexposure modes
  • Quirky con
  • Clumsy control system
  • Video is an afterthought
  • Minor build quality complaints
  • Controls take longer than usual to master. Battery life and meter can cut a planned long day shooting too short
  • Expensive
  • Not geared toward casual users
  • No matter how much money they have
  • Small LCD screen with so-so quality
  • Viewfinder prone to light leaks
  • 1/1000 min shutter speed at f2
  • Lacks built-in wi-fi and GPS
  • Limited movie exposure options
  • Buttons occassionally unresponsive.
  • 35mm lens might be a bit restrictive for some
  • Pricey option when CSCs are considered
  • While improved
  • AF still not quick in all situations

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-06-26, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • A stunning design and jaw-dropping image quality – worth the high price ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2013-06-05, Author: Simon , review by: stuff.tv

  • Abstract:  The work that's been put into improving autofocus speed is undeniable, with the X100S snapping into focus quicker and more accurately than its rivals. Picture quality is exceptional, and almost equal to the Sony RX1, even when shooting RAW.But it's also j...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-16, Author: Catherine , review by: digitalversus.com

  • Exceptionally sharp lens, Sensor captures high levels of detail, ISO test results impeccable up to 6400 ISO, Highend build quality, Digital Split Image function helps with manual focusing
  • No stabilisation, A few more design/handling features could have been updated, Digital Split Image mode isn't really precise enough, Video mode could be more practical, Battery life is quite low (250 shots)
  • The Fuji X100s updates the X100 without going too crazy. Picture quality has taken a giant leap forward, making the X100s a true reference to be reckoned with across all camera categories. However, it hasn't really evolved in other respects. Although the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-09, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Retro design, hybrid viewfinder with wider-than-100% optical viewfinder and electronic overlay/full-time EVF options, improvements to autofocus compared to original X100, solid build quality, decent image quality, digital split image and peaking make for
  • At over a grand its undeniably expensive (X-E1 with a lens is less), no true ISO 100 sensitivity, exposure compensation dial still knocks out of place fairly easily, small LCD screen given chunky overall design, autofocus can be inaccurate/fail to focus,
  • When it comes to buying a specialist camera there's a lot to dissect and chew on. As we alluded to in our opening words of this review, the X100S isn't going to be suitable for a huge audience - but that, in some regard, is part of what makes this h...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-09, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

  • Like most first attempts, the Fujifilm X100 showed plenty of promise, but ultimately fell short in a few key areas. After two years in the lab, Fuji has returned with the X100S, resolving many of the key complaints users had about the X100. Through that p...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(81%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-06, Author: Tony , review by: amateurphotographer.co.uk

  • Fujis strategy for the X100S was to keep the good features of the X100, make changes according to customer requests and to evolve the technologies. On this basis, the X100S is a firm success. The elegant looks of its X100 predecessor remain. Several hand...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-14, Author: Andrew , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Fujifilm has approached the X100S in the right way. It hasn't changed anything that couldn't do with a tweak or two, simply sliding-in the improvements made in the cameras released since the introduction of the X100 in 2011. It's seems an excellent camera...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-01-07, Author: Angela , review by: techradar.com

  • Detail, rich images, Bright lens, Retro, style controls, Solid build
  • Filters are JPEG only, Bulky, Limited continuous AF
  • By taking some of the best elements of the Fuji X-Pro1 , such as the sensor design and Quick Menu, Fuji has produced a worthy update to the X100 , and many owners of this camera will feel sorely tempted by the X100S. The improved handling and image quali...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-01, Author: Gavin , review by: T3.com

  • Retro styling, Unique viewfinder, Lots of manual controls
  • Very expensive, Small LCD screen, No dedicated video button

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-07-01, Author: Chaitanya , review by: exhibit.tech

  • Abstract:  Look-wise, they look identical, except the 'S' symbol on the front. It's the same 'range finder' camera looks, retro style and compact body. But a better processor, sensor and faster auto-focusing motor. Does that make it a worthy upgrade?Chaitanya Tapase...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×