us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Nikon D3X



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon D3X

Testseek.com have collected 51 expert reviews of the Nikon D3X and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon D3X.
Award: Highest Rated February 2009
February 2009
 
(87%)
51 Reviews
Users
(80%)
15 Reviews
87 0 100 51

The editors liked

  • The best all-around image quality yet in a studio-oriented digital SLR
  • Fast overall speed from start-up to image capture
  • Rugged
  • Well-balanced camera build
  • Reliable and speedy autofocus system even in low light
  • Accurate exposure system.
  • 24.5-megapixel FX format (24 x 35.9mm) CMOS sensor provides exceptional pixel quality at that resolution
  • DX mode (cropped sensor) has useful resolution (10.4 megapixels)
  • Fast burst speed of 5 fps at full FX resolution
  • Very fast burst speed of 7 fps ...
  • Build and handling
  • Superb image quality
  • Ergonomics
  • Screen size
  • AF performance
  • White Balance control
  • EXPEED image processing and noise control.
  • At low ISOs clean
  • Artifact-free output with class-leading pixel-level detail
  • Resolution up with the very best
  • Efficient D-Lighting preserves extra highlight detail (although the effect is fairly subtle)
  • Good High ISO/noise performance
  • Usable results...
  • Incredible resolution
  • Image quality up to ISO 1600
  • Handling and performance

The editors didn't like

  • Very expensive
  • Noise levels at ISO 3200 not quite as good as Canon 1Ds Mark III
  • No HD movie mode
  • Shooting buffer is faster than the competition but takes at least 30 seconds to full clear
  • Speeds drop to one frame per second in 14-bit RAW mode.
  • Noticeably slower full-autofocus shutter response in than the D3. (0.161 vs 0.085 second)
  • Poor auto white balance in incandescent lighting
  • 14-bit RAW mode significantly slows burst rate
  • No automated sensor filter cleaning (not that that ever makes a...
  • No Anti dust system.
  • Self-Timer cannot be used in Live-View
  • Image parameters only offer limited latitude of adjustment
  • Unreliable Auto White Balance in artificial light
  • Steep JPEG tone curve can lead to clipped highlights
  • Slight tendency to overexpose flash images at shor...
  • No dust control
  • No builtin flash
  • Auto WB not foolproof
  • That price tag!

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-01-28, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Build and handling, superb image quality, ergonomics, screen size, AF performance, White Balance control, EXPEED image processing and noise control
  • No Anti dust system
  • The Nikon D3x builds on the previous D3 model providing double the resolution on a full frame “FX” format sensor. The camera is every bit as good as the D3 and provides a stunning level of control and image clarity...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-10, review by: techradar.com

  • Highest resolution available, Ultra tough body, Unmatched customisation options
  • No sensor-cleaning, Live View not as good as D90, Expensive

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-01, review by: practicalphotography.com

  • If you simply must have the ultimate image quality available from a camera and medium-format is not an option due to its price, bulk, pedestrian speed or lack of lenses, then you have to splash out on the Nikon D3X. There really is no other camera that...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-02-23, review by: thestar.com.my

  • Very high resolution; low noise and good detail throughout official ISO range.
  • Expensive.
  • So is the D3X worth its price tag? No doubt, the D3X is expensive, especially when you consider that the last top-of-the-line DSLR that Nikon had was only in RM16,000 range. When you consider, however, that the D3X’s price is the same price Canon is...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-02-13, review by: asiaone.com

  • It may cost a lot but it is built like a tank and offers ultra-detailed pictures for professional photographers. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-01-14, Author: Carlos , review by: es.engadget.com

  • Abstract:  En todos los análisis que se han visto hasta ahora, la nueva Nikon D3x sale muy bien parada, de hecho, casi todo son alabanzas. Sin embargo, la última revisión a cargo de Thomas Hogan está algo más equilibrada. Aunque elogió la calidad de imagen (la descr...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-12-13, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Unsere Kamera-Tests bieten zwar Orientierung bei der Auswahl der richtigen Kamera. Doch am Ende entscheidet der User selbst, welches Modell es für ihn sein soll. Welche Digicams derzeit besonders hoch im Kurs unserer Leser stehen, zeigt der CHIP Preisverg...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-10-20, review by: betabuzz.de

  • gute Bedienung, guter Autofokus, exzellente Verarbeitung, robustes Gehäuse
  • automatische Sensorreinigung fehlt, zu geringes ISOSpektrum
  • Zweifelsohne handelt sich bei der D3X um eines der aktuell besten Modelle von Nikon. Abgesehen von kleineren Schwächen werden auch eher schwierige Aufgaben gemeistert. Die 24,5 Megapixel sorgen für eine Farbdarstellung in einer neuen Dimension. Sowohl...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(89%)
 
  Published: 2009-04-16, review by: Cnet.de

  • fantastische Bildqualität, großartiger Dynamikbereich, tolle Verarbeitung, besitzt eines der besten LCDs aller Digitalkameras, exzellenter Autofokus
  • verhältnismäßig niedriger ISO-Bereich, keine automatische Sensorreinigung, bei hohen ISO-Werten leichtes Bildrauschen, Preis
  • Die D3X ist zweifelsohne Nikons bislang beste Digitalkamera, auch wenn man den größten Teil der Funktionen bereits bei der D700 für knapp 5000 Euro weniger bekommt. Trotzdem, es sind diese fünf Prozent Mehrleistung im Grenzbereich, die...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2009-03-11, review by: magnus.de

  • Mit der D3x ist Nikon jetzt im Olymp der hochauflösenden Profi-SLRs angekommen. Die Verdoppelung der Pixelzahl im Vergleich zur D3 hat erstaunlich wenig Auswirkung auf andere Parameter der Bildqualität wie Rauschen oder Texturverlust – ein Ergebnis, d...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×