us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2

Testseek.com have collected 85 expert reviews of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2.
Award: Highest Rated May 2010
May 2010
 
(83%)
85 Reviews
Users
(88%)
9 Reviews
83 0 100 85

The editors liked

  • Very good photo quality (though see issues below)
  • Compact
  • Well designed body with interchangeable lenses
  • Comes in three colors
  • Flipout
  • Rotating 3inch touchscreen LCD display with high resolution
  • Great outdoor / low light visibility
  • Generally wellimplemented touch features for focus
  • Phototaking
  • Menu navigation
  • And image playback
  • Large
  • High resolution electronic viewfinder
  • Firstrate li
  • Rear control dial is in better position
  • Articulating
  • High-resolution 3
  • 2 LCD
  • High-resolution EVF
  • IR sensor switches between EVF and LCD
  • Good shape to grip
  • Soft
  • Warm rubber finish
  • 20g lighter than its predecessor
  • But camera still has good heft
  • ...
  • Image quality is outstanding
  • Camera layout is good
  • Important features are accessible by "one touch"
  • Quick autofocus and good response times
  • LCD can rotate away from the camera
  • Can shoot photos with touch on LCD
  • EVF is extremely bright and sharp
  • Nice touch-screen implementation
  • Articulated LCD
  • Relatively fast
  • Pretty good EVF
  • Reliably good image quality up to ISO 800
  • Usable up to ISO 3200
  • Accurate metering and focus
  • Good JPEG resolution (though stick to raw for best results)
  • Fast and responsive in use
  • Good ergonomics all around
  • Excellent build quality
  • Nice handling
  • Touch screen adds a couple of very useful features
  • Doesn't replace extensive external controls
  • Very useful status panel and quick menu allow di
  • Intuitive touchscreen
  • Movie mode
  • Compact size

The editors didn't like

  • Camera tends to slightly underexpose and clip highlights
  • Redeye a problem
  • Digital correction feature did not help
  • At least for me
  • Touch features don't add a lot to the shooting experience
  • Too easy to accidentally change focus area
  • Unremarkable continuous shooting mode
  • Movies created with AVCHD Lite codec are difficult to share and edit
  • Frame rate isn't true 60 fps
  • Motion JPEG movies have
  • Grip area is somewhat slick
  • Rear EVF protrudes far behind the camera
  • Making it harder to fit into small spaces
  • Kit lens has no IS switch (camera menu only)
  • Plastic mount
  • Lots of geometric distortion in uncorrected RAW at wide-angle
  • Which contribu...
  • Will take some time to learn all of the features
  • LCD is a little tough to see in direct sunlight
  • Price seems a little high
  • Touchscreen LCD is easy to smudge
  • Images a little noisier at midrange ISO sensitivities than they should be
  • Too easy to accidentally move focus points with touch screen
  • Out-of-camera JPEG color not as appealing as best competitors
  • New kit lens not as good as predecessor
  • ISO 6400 verging on the unusable
  • High ISO default noise reduction a bit too high
  • Dynamic range still not as good as best APS-C competitors
  • User interface looking a bit dated (and possibly a bit daunting to the first time user)
  • Some touch-screen menus a bit fiddly
  • High ISO image quality
  • Excess scene modes

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-07-30, review by: alphr.com

  • A highly capable camera with a touchscreen and superb EVF, but image quality and build are a tad disappointing ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-29, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Excellent electronic viewfinder; high-resolution, articulating display; touchscreen-based autofocus and shooting; vivid, crisp image quality
  • Duplication of physical and touchscreen controls; hyper-complicated features
  • The Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 takes great pictures, but this Micro Four Thirds camera's mass of features makes it complicated and often disorientating to use...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-20, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Panasonic's G2 is a well-specified camera and the new kit lens is a great upgrade, but its image quality still can't match comparably priced DSLRs. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-09, review by: macworld.co.uk

  • One-touch HD video; lightweight; surprisingly good image quality; fast
  • Requires investment in a new camera system; almost fully automated operation could frustrate experienced photographers; no in-body anti shake

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-04, review by: techradar.com

  • Quality build and looks, Innovative touchscreen AF, Decent 720p HD movie mode, Reasonable kit lens, Excellent electronic viewfinder
  • Limited choice of lenses, Some eccentric layout, Movie-mode tweaks could be simplerl, Not 1080p HD recording, Limited RAW editing software
  • ForQuality build and looksInnovative touchscreen AFDecent 720p HD movie modeReasonable kit lensExcellent electronic viewfinder...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-01, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The best combination here of image quality, camera build and features, we highly recommend the Panasonic Lumix G2’s one-touch HD video recording, choice of viewfinders and its tiltable LCD. Buying in to the Micro FourThirds concept in the first place ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-05-25, review by: Photoradar.com

  • There is no question that the G2 is an outstanding buy – and will undoubtedly help to consolidate the popularity of the fledgeling Micro Four Thirds system. Many of the features of the new camera are shared with the G1 and other members of the Panasoni...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-05-25, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Pluses, Powerful image stabilisation on a responsive camera, Good quality electronic viewfinder, Moveable touchscreen LCD display is useful, Effective and useful iA mode, Electronic noise well handled
  • Minuses, Loud shutter release, No 1080p video or stereo sound, Interface is somewhat complicated for a generalist camera

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2010-05-20, review by: T3.com

  • Dedicated video record button, angle-adjustable high res LCD with touch screen convenience, easy to use
  • Pricey. Anyone adopting the Micro Four Thirds system from scratch should check out the cheaper, pared down version in the G10
  • Well featured alternative to a DSLR, provides a shallower learning curve for those trading up from a compact, whilst ticking the boxes for latest must haves including HD video and vari-angle LCD

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2010-05-20, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Touchscreen LCD, 720p HD video (plus stereo sound), lots of good quality lenses
  • High ISO image quality, expect to pay a little more than most other hybrid systems, 14-42mm kit lens could be better
  • Far from novel the G2's new touchscreen capability extends its ease of use and is an ideal next step for the series to take. The 720p video mode is top quality, and although high ISO image quality is seen off by Samsung's NX10, the G2 holds its own on ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 4 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×