us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10

Testseek.com have collected 53 expert reviews of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10.
Award: Recommended January 2008
January 2008
 
(74%)
53 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
74 0 100 53

The editors liked

  • The L10 has a nice body design
  • And its articulated LCD makes live-view shooting much more useful.
  • And
  • Good macro performance
  • Articulating 2.5inch LCD
  • Excellent image quality
  • Particularly with RAW images
  • RAW
  • JPEG and RAW+JPEG formats
  • Live View
  • Very good metering and auto focus with Live View
  • Good colour rendition
  • Good kit lens with Mega OIS stabilization
  • Dust reduction system
  • Excellent build Good ergonomics Great grip Buttons are well-positioned on the right side Excellent optical performance Good chromatic aberration control
  • Made better after in-camera processing Very sharp corners with little distortion Fast full-AF shutter...
  • Lens
  • OIS
  • White balance
  • Live view
  • Responsive
  • Nice menus
  • Low ISO image quality
  • Handling
  • Flip out LCD makes the most of Live View.
  • Excellent resolution and per pixel definition
  • But really need to shoot raw to get the best results
  • Subtle
  • Restrained color and contrast (though see below)
  • Better highlight dynamic range than Olympus equivalent (still a little tight in the highlights)...
  • Full time live-view. High-quality lens with optical stabilization.
  • Live View with flip-out screen
  • Quality kit lens with stabilisation
  • Contrast-based AF with neat options
  • Effective anti-dust system.

The editors didn't like

  • The L10 is only available as a kit
  • Has trouble focusing in very low light
  • Tops out at ISO 1
  • 600
  • And its live mode has limited functionality when using most lenses
  • Of summary box
  • And clarify information about the external controls. The rating was unchanged.]
  • No whitebalance bracketing
  • Limited software bundle
  • Some shadow noise as of 100 ISO under some circumstances
  • And quite noisy as of 800 ISO
  • Small TTL viewfinder
  • Builtin flash causes a lens shadow with the kit lens
  • Short battery life with Live View
  • Expensive
  • Demosiacing problem in JPEG images JPEGs slightly soft High default contrast Strong noise in shadows blurs detail Horizontal banding in high ISO low light images Weak flash requires heavy compensation to get close to a proper exposure Expensive bundle Bel...
  • Small viewfinder
  • Noise in images at high ISO
  • Build
  • Slower aperture kit lens (than L1)
  • No depth of field preview in Live View.
  • Small and dark viewfinder view (difficult to see fine detail
  • Difficult to check focus)
  • New kit lens slow (F3.8-5.6) considering its size
  • In-camera JPEG processing produces images that are soft and dont show true potential of sensor
  • Many will find defa...
  • Subpar image-quality. Not much headroom in RAW captures. Very pricey.
  • Uncomfortable pricing
  • Contrast-AF requires special lenses
  • Poor burst in RAW or at higher ISOs
  • Default output benefits from sharpening.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-11-07, review by: dcresource.com

  • Abstract:  Shop & Save Support us by shopping online for the Lumix DMC-L10 here! Price range: $1299 - $1299View all prices for this product Your donation is also greatly appreciated.The Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 is the second digital SLR from the Japanese consum...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-05, Author: Philip , review by: cnet.com

  • The L10 has a nice body design, and its articulated LCD makes live-view shooting much more useful.
  • The L10 is only available as a kit, has trouble focusing in very low light, tops out at ISO 1,600, and its live mode has limited functionality when using most lenses
  • A nice body design and good image quality make the DMC-L10 an enticing entry-level SLR, but a pricey kit lens makes this kit too expensive.

Read the full review (Lumix DMC-L10K) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(71%)
 
  Published: 2007-11-05, review by: digitalcamerareview.com

  • Panasonic Lumix L10 Review BY: JerryJ, DigitalCameraReview.com Editor PUBLISHED: 11/5/2007 Panasonic Lumix L10 Review Article ContentsPanasonic Lumix L10 Review Image Gallery The second full-featured Digital SLR from Panasonic is the new Lumix DMC-L10....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-03, review by: photographyblog.com

  • Trying to decide what award the Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 should receive has proven to be a difficult task, principally because the overall package thats currently available doesnt make too much sense. Panasonic have gone to great lengths to make the ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-11-01, review by: Megapixel.net

  • Excellent image quality, particularly with RAW images, RAW, JPEG and RAW+JPEG formats, Live View, Very good metering and auto focus with Live View, Good colour rendition, Good kit lens with Mega OIS stabilization, Dust reduction system
  • Some shadow noise as of 100 ISO under some circumstances, and quite noisy as of 800 ISO, Small TTL viewfinder, Builtin flash causes a lens shadow with the kit lens, Short battery life with Live View, Expensive
  • The Lumix DMC-L10 is the latest dSLR creation from Panasonic, and a departure in terms of design from their last dSLR camera, the DMC-L1. The L10 has a rounded form, is compact, and somewhat reminiscent of Panasonics FZ cameras. Equipped with a Four ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-01, review by: cameralabs.com

  • Live View with flip-out screen, Quality kit lens with stabilisation, Contrast-based AF with neat options, Effective anti-dust system.
  • Uncomfortable pricing, Contrast-AF requires special lenses, Poor burst in RAW or at higher ISOs, Default output benefits from sharpening.
  • There’s no denying the L10 is a very good DSLR, but due to its quality kit lens and extra features it finds itself in a slightly uncomfortable spot. It’s obviously worth more than budget DSLRs, but finds itself competing against some higher-en...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2007-09-22, Author: Cliff , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Note: This preview is based on a pre-production camera, so all performance estimates are subject to change before final release, and the sample pictures are presented in low resolution only at the request of Panasonic. ---- I've been lucky enough to get...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-08-30, review by: dpreview.com

  • Excellent resolution and per pixel definition, but really need to shoot raw to get the best results, Subtle, restrained color and contrast (though see below), Better highlight dynamic range than Olympus equivalent (still a little tight in the highlights)...
  • Small and dark viewfinder view (difficult to see fine detail, difficult to check focus), New kit lens slow (F3.8-5.6) considering its size, In-camera JPEG processing produces images that are soft and dont show true potential of sensor, Many will find defa...
  • Panasonics second digital SLR is a far more conventional affair than its first attempt, the DSC-L1. Its also quite obviously aimed at a very different type of user - the beginner / first time user / upgrader from a compact. To this end the L10 has p...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(65%)
 
  Published: 2009-02-12, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • A capable enough performer, but it doesn’t offer enough for the money to come out on top. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(67%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-16, review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • Focus is quick and accurate and, as seems to be the case with the Four Thirds system, there is slightly greater depth of field at any given focal length. Resolution of lens and sensor is good. Colour rendition is very good, particularly of solid primar...
  • Dynamic range is poor and image noise at ISO settings above 800 is seriously intrusive. We noticed that Olympus seem to do better in controlling noise from the same sensor. We have a reservation about the price. A comparable Olympus E-510 costs $1500.
  • The physics of the Four Thirds system involves matching lenses to sensor in an arrangement that is ideal for digital cameras. The claim is that digital SLRs that are adaptations of film cameras involve unacceptable compromises, because light needs to s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×