us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Sony Cybershot DSC-RX1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Sony Cybershot DSC-RX1

Testseek.com have collected 122 expert reviews of the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX1 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sony Cybershot DSC-RX1.
Award: Most Awarded March 2013
March 2013
 
(82%)
122 Reviews
Users
(89%)
75 Reviews
82 0 100 122

The editors liked

  • Fullframe sensor
  • Stellar image quality
  • Excellent lens
  • Customization
  • Solid feature set
  • Smallest full-frame camera on the market
  • By a wide margin
  • Fantastic image quality
  • Excellent
  • Fast f/2 prime lens
  • Images are sharp corner to corner
  • Even wide open
  • F/2 with full-frame sensor gives incredibly shallow depth of field
  • 9-bladed diaphra...
  • Great photo and good video quality in a camera with a nicely functional and fluid shooting design are the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1's highlights
  • Full-frame image sensor. Extremely sharp lens. Excellent high ISO performance. Fast burst shooting. Short shutter lag. Fast f/2 aperture. 1080p60 video capture. Top-notch control layout.
  • Excellent image quality and lens sharpness
  • Manual aperture ring
  • Go Back to Top. Skip To
  • Start of Article
  • Cameras
  • Expensive
  • Sony
  • Amazing image quality
  • Compact
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Lots of manual contols
  • Full-frame
  • 24.3-megapixel sensor
  • Wonderful stills
  • Superior videos
  • Terrific f/2.0 35mm lens
  • Excellent 3-inch 1
  • 229K LCD
  • Excellent image quality in both JPEG and Raw
  • Full frame in a compact
  • Well-built body
  • Dedicated aperture and exposure compensation controls
  • Exceptional build-quality - solid feeling without being too heavy
  • Superb high ISO output in both JPEG and Raw images
  • Essentially silent operation
  • Wide dynamic range Raw files
  • Pleasing metering and white balance results
  • Good level of customization to
  • Sharp
  • Detailed and lifelike images
  • Solid build quality
  • Effective distortion correction option
  • Excellent highISO performance
  • Brilliant corner and edge sharpness (once stopped down)
  • Superb (though not faultless) AWB performance
  • Prompt write times
  • Excellent LCD performance

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive
  • Expensive and even more expensive with optional accessories like an electronic viewfinder
  • Good but not exceptional video quality
  • Fixed
  • Single focal length lens
  • Slight tendency to underexpose
  • Produces unattractive bokeh when the subject is close to the lens
  • Focus can be slow under dim lighting
  • Subtle magenta/cyan tint across frame when shading compensation enabled in both JP...
  • It lacks a viewfinder
  • Autofocus is sluggish
  • And there's no focus peaking in video mode
  • And accessories are very pricey. No zoom capability. Slow to start and shoot. Lens shows some barrel distortion. No built-in viewfinder. External battery charger not included
  • LCD difficult to use in bright light
  • Movie record button awkwardly placed
  • Autofocus somewhat sluggish in low light
  • Relatively short battery life
  • Fussy manual focus
  • Slowish focus performance
  • Especially in low light. Detachable electronic viewfinder is mostly unnecessary. Disappointing video performance. A fixed lens is “a fixed” lens and offers few options. Average output from popup flash
  • Expensive with expensive accessories
  • Poor battery life
  • Inconsistent
  • Slow autofocus
  • No ability to zoom or change lenses
  • Battery life somewhat limited
  • Sony should supply an in-wall charger
  • LCD should tilt and be touch-capable
  • Poor placement of red-dot movie button
  • Autofocus speed not quick enough for fast-moving subjects
  • Autofocus struggles in low light
  • Significant vignetting
  • With any correction baked into Raw files
  • Multiple button presses required to move AF point
  • No built-in viewfinder (and accessory options rather expensive)
  • No focus guides for video shooters
  • Disappointing video quality even when in focus
  • Focus peaking in un-magnified live vie
  • AF can hunt and misfocus
  • Some lens distortion
  • Battery life
  • Aliasing effects (jaggies) with strongly defined details
  • Ease with which exposure compensation dial may be turned accidentally

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 13
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-05-05, review by: shutterbug.com

  • Abstract:  Every year member magazines from the Technical Image Press Association (TIPA) gather to consider and vote on the top products of the year in 40 categories, ranging from cameras to tripods to software and printers. This year's selections represent technolo...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-25, Author: Theano , review by: pdnonline.com

  • Fullframe sensor, stellar image quality, excellent lens, customization, solid feature set
  • Expensive, expensive and even more expensive with optional accessories like an electronic viewfinder, good but not exceptional video quality
  • The target market for this camera is not clear-cut. So far, I've only met one person who actually owns the RX1 and, after a brief chat, it's clear that he's not a professional photographer. On the other hand, the RX1's image quality exceeds that of other ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-18, Author: David , review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Full-frame, 24.3-megapixel sensor, Wonderful stills, superior videos, Terrific f/2.0 35mm lens, Excellent 3-inch 1,229K LCD
  • Battery life somewhat limited; Sony should supply an in-wall charger, LCD should tilt and be touch-capable, Poor placement of red-dot movie button
  • The more we mull it over, “suiting your vision” is an apt description for the RX1. This Cyber-shot is a wonderful photography tool and if you can imagine the shot, the camera will deliver it – within reason, of course. At this price, the RX1 is clearly ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-03, Author: Theano , review by: digitalcamerareview.com

  • excellent image quality and lens sharpness, solid feature set, manual aperture ring
  • LCD difficult to use in bright light, movie record button awkwardly placed, autofocus somewhat sluggish in low light, relatively short battery life, expensive, fussy manual focus
  • All technical and pricing issues aside, one of the things I love about the RX1 is that, in this digital world, it brings me back to thinking before I shoot, much like the Leica M9 does. Sure, there are faster and more clever digital cameras than the RX1 ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-25, review by: wired.com

  • Go Back to Top. Skip To: Start of Article, cameras, expensive, Sony
  • Slowish focus performance, especially in low light. Detachable electronic viewfinder is mostly unnecessary. Disappointing video performance. A fixed lens is “a fixed” lens and offers few options. Average output from popup flash

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-03-26, Author: Lori , review by: cnet.com

  • Great photo and good video quality in a camera with a nicely functional and fluid shooting design are the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1's highlights
  • It lacks a viewfinder, autofocus is sluggish, and there's no focus peaking in video mode
  • With a terrific lens and a great full-frame sensor, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 delivers the best photos we've seen from a fixed-lens camera. But that doesn't come cheap.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-03-08, Author: Jim , review by: pcmag.com

  • Full-frame image sensor. Extremely sharp lens. Excellent high ISO performance. Fast burst shooting. Short shutter lag. Fast f/2 aperture. 1080p60 video capture. Top-notch control layout.
  • Expensive, and accessories are very pricey. No zoom capability. Slow to start and shoot. Lens shows some barrel distortion. No built-in viewfinder. External battery charger not included
  • Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 is the smallest full-frame camera you can find right now, and while it pumps out gorgeous images, its price is likely to induce sticker shock....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-03-07, Author: Dan , review by: theverge.com

  • Amazing image quality, Compact, sturdy build quality, Lots of manual contols
  • Expensive with expensive accessories, Poor battery life, Inconsistent, slow autofocus, No ability to zoom or change lenses

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2013-03-01, review by: digital-photography-school.com

  • Quality: excellent, sharp, accurate colour capture.Why you'd buy the RX1: full list of features; nice lens; easy to use.Why you wouldn't: heavy price; could be confusing for the novice; with such a high-specced camera I did feel the LCD screen was far too...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-24, review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Smallest full-frame camera on the market, by a wide margin, Fantastic image quality, Excellent, fast f/2 prime lens, Images are sharp corner to corner, even wide open, f/2 with full-frame sensor gives incredibly shallow depth of field, 9-bladed diaphra...
  • Fixed, single focal length lens, Slight tendency to underexpose, Produces unattractive bokeh when the subject is close to the lens, Focus can be slow under dim lighting, Subtle magenta/cyan tint across frame when shading compensation enabled in both JP...
  • Does it say anything revealing about a camera's printed image quality that when we printed an 8 x 10 at ISO 6,400, looked at it with amazement, and naturally assumed we must have somehow made a mistake and were in reality looking at ISO 400 instead? That...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 13 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 13   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×