Testseek.com have collected 23 expert reviews of the Sunbeam Tuniq TX-2 and the average rating is 93%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sunbeam Tuniq TX-2.
January 2008
(93%)
23 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
93010023
The editors liked
Simple Plastic Package
Excellent Thermal Conductivity
Fast & Easy Application
Decent Instant Performance
RoHS Compliant
Competitive Pricing
Superior thermal conductivity
Not electrically conductive
Spreads easy clean consistency
Reasonably priced
Wont break down over time
Performs on par with the competition
Low price
Decent performance
Easy to handle and clean up
Not as dependent on settling time like the AS5
Price – cheaper than the competition
Slightly edges out AS5 in performance
Non-conductive
Contains no silver
Doesn’t get runny
Easy to apply.
Non conductive
Easy installation
Solid performance
Smooth
Easy to spread
Excellent transmission of heat
The editors didn't like
N/A
Performs on par with the competition
Does not perform as well as AS5 when allowed to breakin
As I said earlier, the only way I could really "test" the Tuniq TX-2 was to use it and see how it performed compared to another well-known brand. I wanted to make sure that the results I obtained were as accurate as possible, so I tested each compound...
So how well did Tuniq's TX-2 thermal paste perform in our review today?One particular area that TX-2 performed exceptionally well in was the fact that it is able to give a very satisfactory performance straight out of the syringe.To be honest, I find the...
Abstract: Home > Reviews > Cooling > Tuniq TX-2 Thermal Compound Review Tuniq TX-2 Thermal Compound ReviewMatthew Page November 13th, 2007E-MAILPRINTMOST POPULARPDF VERSIONXML VERSION Tuniq is working hard to make a name for th...
I was pleasantly surprised to find that the TX-2 appears to work just as well as AS5, if not a little bit better. It is also much easier than AS5 to apply and clean up. With both products costing the same (currently $5.99 from Newegg), the TX-2 is an ...
Superior thermal conductivity, Not electrically conductive, Spreads easy clean consistency, Reasonably priced, Wont break down over time, Performs on par with the competition
Performs on par with the competition
To put things in perspective, if one cooler bested another by four degrees Celsius, people would be singing from the rooftops. For load temperature results to drop over four degrees Celsius by changing the kind of thermal paste you use is equally adm...
Well, in the end when it comes to thermal compounds it really about how much impact it has on the heat reduction. There are reasons to buy fancy thermal compound, certainly when you are an overclocker who wants to squeeze as much performance out of the...
Low price, Decent performance, Easy to handle and clean up, Not as dependent on settling time like the AS5
Does not perform as well as AS5 when allowed to breakin
There is not really much that can be said about a thermal paste. Users expect something that performs better than the stock compounds and that it is easy to work with. The Tuniq TX-2 compound does just that. While it may not perform as good as the crow...
A few degrees less for a few dollars less is how I would sum up Tuniqs TX-2 high performance thermal grease. It performed the best in all of the tests by a few degrees. A few degrees is significant to overclockers because we need to keep our temperat...
For all intents and purposes, the Tuniq MX-2 seems like a wise choice over Arctic Silver 5. Both Tuniq and Noctua have produced a product that performs better in some circumstances, and at least matches the performances of the base-line AC 5. Tuniq ha...
Excellent Performance, Little/No Burn in time needed, Non Conductive
None
When I started reviewing the TX-2 paste, I wasn’t sure what to expect, as to be honest I hadn’t heard much about it at all. I was pleasantly surprised when it was able to match and beat the enthusiast’s paste of choice (Arctic Silver 5)...