us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 3.5GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 3.5GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 270 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice July 2017
July 2017
 
(81%)
270 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
81 0 100 270

The editors liked

  • Low price
  • Four physical cores
  • Unlocked multipliers
  • Beefy bundled cooler
  • Supports inexpensive chipsets
  • Four physical cores for much less than competing Intel Core i5 chips
  • Good Performance
  • All Quad-Cores
  • Low Power Consumption
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Excellent price
  • A viable alternative to Intel Core i3-7300
  • Good multi-threaded performance compared to similarly-priced Intel chips
  • Single-thread performance improved over previous generation
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Heatsink included
  • Platform updated to
  • 50% More Cores Than Core i3
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Fully Unlocked
  • Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool

The editors didn't like

  • No SMT
  • Lacks thread-doubling SMT tech of pricier Ryzen chips
  • Eight-thread Ryzen 5 chips start at just $30 more
  • Typically Trails Core i3 In Single-Thread Workloads
  • Moderate Overclocking
  • Single-threaded performance still lags behind competing Intel chips
  • Gaming performance slightly behind Intel chips
  • Lacks integrated graphics
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Requires optimized apps of which there are not m
  • Memory Compatibility Limited

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 9 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-12-02, Author: delly , review by: hwlegend.com

  • Prestazioni velocistiche convincenti grazie alla nuovissima microarchitettura modulare ZEN ed ai quattro Core fisici presenti, Avanzato processo produttivo a 14 nanometri FinFET di GlobalFoundries, Moltiplicatore di frequenza completamente sbloccato, Memo
  • Performance a volte leggermente sottotono, aspetto con tutta probabilità risolvibile con future ottimizzazioni lato software, Si ringrazia per il campione fornitoci, Ricordiamo che Bestit è distributore ufficiale Italiano di AMD, Gianluca Cecca - delly -
  • Con la nuova famiglia di CPU Ryzen 3 il colosso americano ha di fatto completato la sua line-up per sistemi desktop dedicati alla fascia mainstream del mercato, con l'obiettivo di garantire a ciascun utente il prodotto ideale in relazione alle proprie esi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-18, Author: Daniele , review by: everyeye.it

  • Senza ombra di dubbio, il 1300X è uno dei migliori processori della famiglia Ryzen. Il prezzo è estremamente accessibile e il rapporto prestazioni-costo davvero molto elevato. Se overcloccato può rendere ancora di più, ed AMD ha certamente preso la decisi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(94%)
 
  Published: 2017-07-27, Author: Paolo , review by: hwupgrade.it

  • Al termine di questa analisi i processori Ryzen 3 annunciati quest'oggi da AMD e disponibili in vendita confermano le buone qualità dei modelli di fascia più alta. L'architettura quad core è un punto di forza rispetto alle proposte concorrenti Intel Core...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-02-03, Author: Christoph , review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  Bei neuen Spitzenmodellen reicht oft nur Geduld, um das Smartphone unter 500 Euro zu bekommen.2018 erklommen die Preise für Top-Smartphones neue Regionen. Das auffälligste Beispiel liefert Apple: Das günstigste aktuelle iPhone beginnt bei 849 Euro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-22, Author: Ingolf , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-03, Author: Florian , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage. Ein...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-01-15, Author: Henrik , review by: hw-journal.de

  • abschließende WorteDie Tests haben gezeigt, dass selbst der kleine Vierkerne ohne SMT noch immer eine gute Figur abgibt. Egal ob Spiele oder Anwendungen, die Distanz zu den großen Modell wird niemals extrem. Natürlich muss man hier aber auch beachten...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-08, Author: Carsten , review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Geforce GTX 980 Ti @ 1.380/3.900 MHz, 8 GiByte per memory channel with max. speeds according to each CPUs' specification, Windows 10 (64 Bit), Turbo & SMT on, 1.280 x 720, max. Details (minimal or no PostProcessing i.e. Ambient Occlusion or Bloom), no AA/
  • Intel Core i3-8100 vs AMD Ryzen 3 1300X: Bester Quadcore bis 120 Euro Quelle: PC GAmes Hardware Im Bereich der Einsteiger-Quadcores bis 120 Euro hat Intel mit dem i3-8100 den besseren Prozessor im Angebot. Im Gegensatz zu den 200-Euro-Hexacores aus unsere...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-20, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.de

  • Die schlechte Nachricht vorab: DIE beste CPU gibt es als Allgemeinaussage so eigentlich nicht, wenn man alle Facetten wie Anwendungszweck, tatsächlich benötigte Performance, Gesamtkonzeption des PCs und das eigene Budget mit einbezieht. Die für einen und...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-10, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  Als Project Cars in finaler Version erschien, war die Performance insbesondere auf GPUs von AMD schlecht. Der Nachfolger Project Cars 2 zeigt im Benchmark-Test hingegen eine deutlich bessere Leistung...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 9 of 27 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×