Testseek.com have collected 269 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
May 2018
(82%)
269 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
820100269
The editors liked
Strong Performance
Easily Overclockable
Competitive Pricing
Solid performance improvements
Remarkable energy-efficiency
Outstanding performance in multi-threaded apps
Unlocked CPU multiplier
Supports existing AM4 motherboards
CPU cooler included
Soldered IHS
The editors didn't like
Single Thread Perf Still Trails Intel
Gaming performance lower than 2600X
Single-threaded performance of the architecture lower than Intel's
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 does not only present a cost-efficient price for gamers who are budget-conscious, but it is also great for enthusiasts and overclockers who do not have enough cash to purchase flagship parts. The improvements and developments in manuf...
Strong multi core performance, Compatible with previous AM4 motherboards, Solid transcoding performance, Overclocks close to 2700X
– Wraith Spire cooler won't really support an overclock
When comparing the Ryzen 7 2700 to its predecessor, the 1700, we couldn't help but be impressed. It's faster, taps into more cores when it engages the boost clocks and has better memory compatibility. This is a clear step forward for Ryzen as a product.Th...
While we were super excited and impressed by the 2600X and 2700X, we found the 2600 and 2700 slightly less impressive, but still excellent values. For $30 more you are just paying AMD for a slight frequency boost, something you can do for free. While most...
Great value, Huge multi-thread performance, Overclockable,
Slower single-core performance than Intel, Poor overclocking headroom,
It's the same old story. AMD's latest chips are great value for certain tasks but less so for others. You get masses of multi-thread performance, but single-thread and gaming performance trails Intel's rival processors a little...
Abstract: It's the age-old question that has spurred endless debate: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has reached new heights with AMD's Ryzen 2000 Series, often referred to by users (but not AMD) as "Ryzen 2," competing against Intel's 8th Gen "Coffee Lake" for d...
Faster than previous-gen Ryzen models, Bundled cooler adds value, Backward compatibility with 300-series motherboards, Indium solder improves thermal transfer
Needs a better cooler for overclocking, No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet, Large performance deficit compared to a stock Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD's first-generation "non-X" Ryzen processors were universally hailed as budget champions. That changes with the company's 2000-series CPUs, though. Its Ryzen 7 2700 is only $30 cheaper than the 2700X. Given a choice between them, we'd rather have the f...
Published: 2018-05-16, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk
Abstract: Is there any reason to buy an Intel CPU now that the AMD Ryzen 2700 and 2600 are out? Or even reason to get the X variants (2700X & 2600X)? Lets benchmark them and find out! Want one? Amazon 2700: prourls.co/5u0q Amazon 2600: prourls.co/0gwh Products show...
Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com
For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...
Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com
I can see the Ryzen 5 2600 and the 2600X fast becoming the most popular chips of the second generation Ryzen launch. They're fast, they're affordable, and they're easy to keep cool and overclock. I mean, if you're just doing a massive amount of rendering...
