us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2

Testseek.com have collected 190 expert reviews of the AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2 and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2.
Award: Most Awarded April 2014
April 2014
 
(76%)
190 Reviews
Users
(90%)
292 Reviews
76 0 100 190

The editors liked

  • CPU and graphics both (slightly) improved
  • Compatible with existing FM2-socket motherboards
  • AMD adds support for DDR3-2133
  • Nudges performance higher.
  • Great overclocking ability
  • Native 2133MHz memory support
  • Continued FM2 based socket
  • Beats comparatively priced Intel CPUs
  • Integrated GPU Overclocked well
  • AMD Overdrive was very easy to use
  • No Need to get a New Motherboard
  • Amazing overclocking
  • Excellent and affordable entry-level 3D rendering power
  • Decent iGPU clocking
  • Low platform price
  • Piledriver CPU core design
  • Support for up to two VGAs in CrossfireX with supported board products
  • Support for 3+1 Eyefinity display

The editors didn't like

  • Much less power-efficient than comparable Intel processors
  • Only a minor performance boost over A10-5800K
  • Bottom Line
  • AMD's Richland APUs boost clock speeds and refine power consumption. In particular
  • The AMD A10-6800K is a decent
  • Low-cost alternative to Intel's Core i3/i5 products
  • None
  • Performance over Trinity doesn't Justify Pricing
  • Same maximum TDP as earlier FM2 products
  • Perhaps a bit late to the market
  • With laptop-grade parts already being for sale
  • Not a true new technology—just clock bumps
  • "Low" but adequate CPU Performance will not appeal to some

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 19
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-06-04, Author: Victor , review by: Bjorn3d.com

  • The A10-6800K delivers somewhere from 5% to 25% performance improvements over the A10-5800K where a workload is CPU bound, then the improvement often lies on the lower end of the spectrum. On the average, the APU is about 10% faster than its predecessor....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-04, Author: Don , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Richland, code name for AMD's highest-end APUs, finds its way into our lab in the form of A10-6700 and A10-6800K. Based on the Piledriver architecture and VLIW4 graphics, these chips are slight improvements to Trinity. Can they outshine Core i3, though? ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-04, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Beats comparatively priced Intel CPUs, Integrated GPU Overclocked well, AMD Overdrive was very easy to use, No Need to get a New Motherboard,
  • Performance over Trinity doesn't Justify Pricing
  • The AMD A10-6800K APU is a good next-step in the world of AMD Accelerated Processing Units. It represents a slight increase in performance in both the CPU and GPU portions of the unit over the last generation of Trinity processors. I'm not sure that I...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
 
  Published: 2013-06-05, Author: formerstaff , review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Abstract:  It seemed like forever that anything AMD was promoting, sold, or advertised was accompanied somewhere on the screen with the slogan

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-06-04, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  While it may be based on last year’s Trinity architecture AMD’s new Richland A10-6800K and A10-6700 APUs bring higher performance and new features to the table without consuming more power. However, in such a competitive processor market, will they r...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-14, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-01, review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  Our series of gaming performance articles where we take one CPU and put it up against another one and run a series of game benchmarks, is very well known meanwhile...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-12-13, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  Should you be thinking about buying a used CPU in the price range of 120 to 150 Euro, then you might be considering to buy either an Intel Core i5-2500K or an AMD A10-6800K. At this point we want to answer the question which of these CPUs would be the bet...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-12-06, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In the past few years, Intel and AMD have spent a lot of resources in improving the performance of their integrated graphics units. Intel has been working hard to make sure their HD graphics becomes competitive with AMDs Radeon units. Today we're going to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-11-30, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In the past few months we tested and compared quite a few Intel CPUs regarding gaming performance. Therefore it's about time that we have a closer look at some AMD CPUs. Today we're going to check out AMDs A10-6800K and put it up against its predecessor t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 19 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×