us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD A10-7800 3.7GHz Socket FM2+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD A10-7800 3.7GHz Socket FM2+

Testseek.com have collected 119 expert reviews of the AMD A10-7800 3.7GHz Socket FM2+ and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A10-7800 3.7GHz Socket FM2+.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2014
August 2014
 
(81%)
119 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
81 0 100 119

The editors liked

  • Integrated graphics can handle most games at 1080p and midrange settings. Compatible with existing FM2+ socket motherboards. Can be configured to run at 45 or 65 watts.
  • Great Graphics Performance
  • Improved Power Efficiency
  • Small CPU Performance Improvements
  • GCN and TrueAudio In An APU
  • HSAenabled APU
  • Most (if not more!) of the performance of the stock A107850K for less
  • Configurable TDPs (65W/45W)
  • Fullyfeatured GCN graphics cores (TrueAudio
  • Mantle
  • Etc.)
  • Compute capable graphics
  • Focus on efficiency is noticeable
  • Integrated GPU is
  • Integrated graphics can handle most games at 1080p and midrange settings
  • Compatible with existing FM2+ socket motherboards
  • Can be configured to run at 45 or 65 watts
  • The A107800 crams a quadcore CPU and an eightcore R7 GPU into a $155 APU that will have you playing modern games on low to medium settings.

The editors didn't like

  • CPU performance still lags behind that of the competition. Fast RAM required for best gaming performance. Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) support currently limited
  • Four AMD Cores Not Always As Fast As Two Intel Cores
  • New Socket
  • Pure CPU performance
  • While “good enough” for intended application
  • Still lacking compared to Intel
  • Software needs to catch up to unlock full potential
  • Not for enthusiasts – narrow range of use
  • Even if within that range there isn't anything comparable
  • CPU performance still lags behind the competition
  • Fast RAM required for best gaming performance
  • HSA support currently limited
  • Folks who can spare a few bucks more are better off with a Core i3 and a discrete GPU while those on a tight budget will find more value in the A87600.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 9 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-04-20, review by: ht.ua

  • Abstract:  Vollkommen überraschend hat Intel im letzten Jahr gleich seine CPU-Generationen 5 und 6 vorgestellt, beide im kleinen 14-nm-Fertigungsprozess hergestellt...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-10-28, Author: master , review by: overclockers.ua

  • По результатам тестирования стало понятно, что линейка гибридных процессоров AMD пополнилась очередной очень удачной моделью. Разница в быстродействии между A10-7800 и флагманским APU Kaveri не превысила и 3% в пользу последнего, тогда как рекомендованная...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-08-31, Author: Сергей , review by: ua.gecid.com

  • С выпуском процессоров AMD A10-7850K и AMD A10-7700K компания AMD доказала всем скептикам, что APU являются достойной альтернативой для связки «процессор + дискретная видеокарта начального уровня». Однако у них по-прежнему осталась старая «болезнь» многих...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-04-06, Author: Testes , review by: clubedohardware.com.br

  • Quando testamos o A10-6800K e o Core i3-4150, concluímos que o Core i3-4150 tinha mais poder de processamento “bruto”, mas que o A10-6800K tinha um motor gráfico integrado melhor, e que poderia ser bom para jogadores eventuais caso o usuário pretendesse u...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-10-14, Author: Paulo , review by: tecnoblog.net

  • Pelos números, fica claro que o forte do A10-7800 não é a CPU. Em tarefas de processamento bruto, os números ficam de 20% a 30% menores que os do seu principal concorrente, o Core i3-4330. Já quando se adiciona a aceleração da GPU, a coisa fica bem mais ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-07, Author: diola , review by: adrenaline.uol.com.br

  • Mesmo vídeo integrado do A10-7850K e consequentemente mesmo desempenho em games com seu uso, Vídeo integrado muito superior ao Intel Graphics 4600 dos Core mais recentes, Suporte as placas-mãe existente para socket FM2+
  • Limita o desempenho de placas de vídeo intermediárias e superiores, Não tem multiplicador desbloqueado, Limite a memórias de 2133MHz, Esquenta bastante
  • O A10-7850 trouxe algumas características interessantes em relação ao 7850K "convencional". Com a redução do clock e a otimização, ele acabou se tornando um meio-termo entre o 7850K e o Core i5 4570 em quesitos como aquecimento e consumo de energia, tudo ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2014-09-12, Author: Sindre , review by: tek.no

  • Kurant integrert grafikk, Relativt strømgjerrig, Egnet for mediasentermaskiner
  • Ikke direkte billig, Litt laber prosessorytelse

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-08-01, review by: Tweak.dk

  • Vi er nu ved at være kommet til vejs ende med dette APU review, og der er faktisk kun tilbage at kigge lidt på nogle priser, inden jeg slutter af med en samlet konklusion, I skrivende stund, den 1. august 2014, kan AMD A10-7800 Kaveri endnu ikke købes gen
  • Yder lige lavt nok i tunge spiltitler - CrossFireX anbefales, Udføringen af tunge arbejdsopgaver haltede lidt
  • Så har jeg virkelig ikke mere at vise jer i dette AMD APU review, og jeg skal derfor forsøge at samle alle mine tanker og nedfælde dem i en samlet konklusion. Så uden at sige så meget mere, vil jeg bare gå i gang. Generelt kan man sige, at en APU er en re...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-10-29, Author: Krzysztof , review by: dobreprogramy.pl

  • Wydajność rdzeni graficznych, Regulowane TDP, Pomysłowa architektura sprzętowa, Sprzętowe wsparcie dla wideo 4K, Niska cena
  • Niewielka wydajność rdzeni CPU, Uzależnienie GPU od pamięci operacyjnej komputera

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-08-18, Author: Marcin , review by: benchmark.pl

  •  maksymalne TDP obniżone do 65 W możliwość zmiany TDP (45W),  proces technologiczny 28nm,  bardzo wydajny zintegrowany układ graficzny Radeon R7 z obsługą DirectX 11.2,  usprawnione rdzenie CPU Steamroller,  technologie HSA, Mantle i True Audio,  nowe d
  •  konieczność wymiany płyty głównej (podstawka FM2),  na dziś dzień potencjał Kaveri nie jest w pełni wykorzystywany (niezbędne oprogramowanie wykorzystujące HSA, Mantle i True Audio)

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(94%)
    page 9 of 12 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×