us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 91 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded October 2014
October 2014
 
(76%)
91 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
76 0 100 91

The editors liked

  • Compatible with older AMD sockets and motherboards. Has a lower TDP rating than other high-end AMD processors.
  • Lower TDP rating than other high-end AMD chips
  • With competitive performance
  • Compatible with older AMD socket ("AM3+") and motherboards
  • 8 cores under $200
  • Good Performance
  • Beats i54670 in most tests

The editors didn't like

  • Bottom Line
  • The AMD FX-8370E processor emphasizes efficiency
  • With low power consumption and reasonable performance
  • Lags in single-core tests
  • Still not as power-efficient as competing Intel chips
  • Which also have on-chip graphics
  • The FX8350 might be a better value
  • 2 yr old refreshed CPUs

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-22, Author: Tomas , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • In the conclusion of this comparison, we can be a lot more firm than in the previous one. If you now have an AMD FX processor, you should consider upgrading to a newer CPU. In almost all benchmarks, you'll gain at least 50% performance, while some modern...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-14, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-10-07, Author: Tony , review by: vortez.net

  • 8 Cores, Fun and easy to overclock, Relatively lower power/ small performance drop, Great price/performance
  • Not Steamroller, Not as efficient as other options
  • Underclocking is not dead it seems, and with a clever, wide turbo which allows the FX-8370e to remain within its TDP, there is only a small performance drop relative to the FX-3850, which can consume a fair bit more power. Though, due to the 95W TDP limit...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-09-23, Author: Leo , review by: kitguru.net

  • Compatible with existing AM3boards, Uses 30w less than previous version, Enough performance for mainstream users
  • Rapidly hits power limit, which disables the turbo boost, Hard to achieve the claimed 4.3GHz in regular use, in most cases it tops out at 3.6GHz, Uses Piledriver rather than Steamroller technology, Pulls almost 50% more wattage than equivalent Intel Core
  • When I started testing AMD's FX-8370E I had the horrible suspicion that it might be faulty as the clock speed started at 3.3GHz and didn't seem to increase with Turbo. This meant the performance was significantly lower than the 4.0GHz/4.2GHz FX-8350 – whi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-09-22, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Does the new FX-8370E represent a step forward for AMD's FX line of processors? Giving a clear answer is somewhat of a challenge. Our test sample performs about the same as its predecessors at similar clock rates, but draws less power doing so. However, i...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-22, Author: Ryan , review by: eteknix.com

  • Reduced TDPs over 125W parts
  • Existing FX 8350 and FX 8320 parts are better value, Reduced power comes at a fairly significant performance hit in most applications, Nothing new has been presented,
  • PricingAMD's FX 8370E has an MSRP of $199.99. We found it at Amazon in the USA for $194.99 and at Newegg for $209.99, in the UK Overclockers are selling it for £145.99. A 3 year AMD warranty is provided.SummaryThe FX 8370E isn't a “new” CPU in the typical...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-07, Author: Stuart , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • As we noted above, one of the strengths of the AMD platform is its future proofing. In the case of the FX CPUs, many people who bought (as an example) the FX-8350 in 2012 will be able to upgrade to the 8370e or 9590 today after a simple BIOS flash. Of cou...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-03, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Eight cores for £140, Reduced 95W TDP, Excels in multithreaded apps, Overclocks well
  • Lowly singlethread performance, Based on old technology, Not as good for gaming as Core i5
  • AMD has extended the reach of its eight-core FX line of premium processors by introducing its first efficiency-optimised, 95W parts. The FX-8370E and FX-8320E reduce maximum wattage by lowering the all-core speed when compared to the traditional FX proce...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-09-30, Author: MiguePR , review by: profesionalreview.com

  • mejora en la eficiencia, procesadores de ocho, buena experiencia gaming, alterativa para ordenador todo terreno, con overclock de serie de 4200 mhz, se puede realizar overclock, mejora en la eficiencia, procesadores de ocho, buena experiencia gaming, alte
  • precio elevado (sobre 210€), se necesita nuevo cambio de arquitectura y chipset,  lastra que las placas bases no tenga ni pci express 3.0 ni sata 3.0 nativos 100%, precio elevado (sobre 210€), se necesita nuevo cambio de arquitectura y chipset,

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
    page 3 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×