us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+

Testseek.com have collected 56 expert reviews of the AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+ and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+.
 
(67%)
56 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 56

The editors liked

  • Better performance than Intel in multithreaded apps
  • Affordable
  • Good upgrade for AM2 motherboards
  • Competes with a similarly priced Intel CPU
  • Even though the Phenom is clocked lower
  • Trounced the E8400 in some games.
  • Grants nice speed boost over Athlon X2 CPUs
  • Supports current AM2motherboard
  • Triple-Core
  • TLB errata fixed
  • Excellent memory management and bandwidth
  • Good performance if the applications are multi-threaded
  • Has potential
  • Betterthan Dual Core Multithreading
  • Lowerthan Quad Core Power and Thermal Requirements
  • Good Overclocking
  • Updated B3 Core
  • Entrylevel Pricing

The editors didn't like

  • UmptionEach core is slower than Intel’s
  • Seems to be slower at severe multitasking than the Intel system.
  • Lags behind Intel Core 2 Duo chips in some tests
  • Four-core Phenom X4 only slightly more expensive
  • Performance is not as great as one would hope for
  • Does not overclcok well
  • Power consumption is higher than the competitor
  • Lackluster Gaming Performance
  • 65nm
  • 2.4 GHz Max Clock

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • AMD Phenom X3 is definitely a very interesting processor. At least since it is the industry’s first CPU with triple-core sign and monolithic organization. And although it is our first experience with a non-standard processor like that, it didn&rsquo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Inexpensive, Improvement in performance, Triple Core design, Best bang for the buck...
  • Not a good overclocker, Comparable performance...
  • The Phenom X3 8750 is a truly new processor. Although not as fast as its Intel counterparts in the scientific benchmarks, the gaming benchmarks were a total turn around. It matched or beat the other processors in most of the benchmarks. The Phenom X3 ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2008-07-11, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • Abstract:  Last month we took a gander at a slew of new offerings from AMD. These included the 780a chipset, 780G chipset and the refreshed Phenom X4 quad-core range.In the Phenom X4 review we mentioned the recent release of the Phenom X3 triple-core processor li...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2008-05-15, review by: impulsegamer.com

  • In conclusion, the AMD Phenom X3 8750 Triple Core Processor worked quite with a variety of applications and games with no issues whatsoever. As developers continue their support of multiple cored processors such as dual, quad or triple core, these are ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(87%)
 
  Published: 2008-05-02, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Three cores, AM2+, 2MB L3 cache, integrated memory controller
  • Not going to win over any Intel users The Final Word Its not going to get AMD any new users, but existing AMD platform users might benefit from the extra upgrade option. On its own, the tri-core Phenom X3 8750 is a fast CPU, but when its street price ...
  • Its not going to get AMD any new users, but existing AMD platform users might benefit from the extra upgrade option. On its own, the tri-core Phenom X3 8750 is a fast CPU, but when its street price is compared against Intels Core 2 Quad 6600 CPU, it ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, review by: tweaktown.com

  • AMD may have had a few hurdles with the K10 architecture in the beginning, but so far we have found it to be a good replacement for the K8, and it’s about time too. AMD has fallen behind Intel quite a bit since the Core 2 architecture managed to wra...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-10-31, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Very fast for certain tasks
  • Two slow on most tasks, Very high power consumption

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-29, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Triple cores break the CPU mould a bit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-25, review by: techradar.com

  • Unique, Decent multi-threaded performance
  • Weedy single and dual-threaded performer, Not cheap enough
  • Put yourself in AMDs shoes. Things havent been going to plan. Your crucial quad-core chip arrived late, ran slow and had a nasty little hardware bug. Whats more, youre being beaten silly by Intels Core 2 processors. What do you do? How about a tri...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-23, review by: HEXUS.net

  • In November 2007, we concluded that AMDs Phenom X4 9600 was no match for Intels Core 2 Quad Q6600. In April 2008, we concluded that AMDs improved Phenom X4 9850 was no match for Intels Core 2 Quad Q6600. Today, were having to conclude that AMDs t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×