Testseek.com have collected 347 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
March 2017
(84%)
347 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(98%)
17 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
840100347
The editors liked
Great Multi Thread performance
Solid Gaming Performance
Nice Overclocking room on 1700
Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
Price
Power Efficiency
Experience
Great Multithreaded Performance
Low Power Consumption
Very Reasonable Price
Best Ryzen 7 Value
Remarkable multithreaded performance
More core and threads than the competition
1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
The full-featured AM4 platform
Excellent value for money
Unlocked ratio multiplier
Lowcost eight core
65W TDP
Bundled cooler
Twice the cores and threads as Intel's competing Core i7-7700K
At a slightly lower price
Our test chip hit nearly 4GHz in overclocking
Strong Overall Performance
8-Cores / 16-Threads
Power Friendly
Aggressive Pricing
Great value for money considering its multi-threaded performance and more than decent single thread performance
Easily overclocks should the need ever arise
Default power requirement is pretty low considering it is an eight-core processor
The cheapest
Great multi-threaded performance
Significant single-threaded performance increase over Bulldozer
Lower TDP than i7-7700K
8-cores
16-threads for only $329
Performance
Overclocking
Power consumption
Value
Outstanding Performance
Low-Power Consumption (65W TDP)
Much Cheaper Than Competition
Ryzen Master Software
Perfect For Multi-Tasking
Can Reach 1800X Performance Easily
Future-Proof Platform
Ultimate Price/Performance Value
Runs Very Cool
The editors didn't like
Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
Bested By Intel In Gaming
Limited Overclocking Capability
Questions remain over gaming performance
Some early adopter quirks linger
Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models
Lower game performance than Intel processors
Poorly optimized software ecosystem
Single-core and 1080p gaming performance lag behind Intel's comparable Kaby Lake chips
Issues In A Few Benchmarks
Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
Lack of game optimization makes Intel quad-cores a better bet
Draws excessive power when overclocked
Single thread performance does not come close to Intel flagship models
Published: 2019-05-26, Author: Дмитрий , review by: overclockers.ru
Abstract: Целью цикла "В погоне за производительностью: процессоры" является изучение производительности актуальной линейки процессоров в современных играх...
Abstract: В данном обзоре будут протестированы процессоры AMD и Intel, находящиеся в ценовом диапазоне от $150 до $225. Для получения разносторонних результатов тесты ЦП пройдут на двух стендах, основанных на видеокартах GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11264 Мбайт и Radeon RX Vega 64 8192 Мбайт...
Published: 2019-05-07, Author: Дмитрий , review by: overclockers.ru
Abstract: В данном обзоре будет проведено сводное тестирование шести поколений видеокарт и процессоров в игре Conan Exiles, основанной на движке Unreal Engine 4. С рецензией по ней вы можете ознакомиться, перейдя по этой ссылке.(function(w, d, n, s, t) { w[n] = w[n...
Abstract: В данном обзоре будет проведено сводное тестирование пяти поколений видеокарт и процессоров в игре For Honor, основанной на движке AnvilNext 2.0. С рецензией по ней вы можете ознакомиться, перейдя по этой ссылке. Напомним, что о работе тестовых стендов...
Published: 2019-04-21, Author: Дмитрий , review by: overclockers.ru
Abstract: В данном обзоре будет проведено сводное тестирование шести поколений видеокарт и процессоров в игре Conan Exiles, основанной на движке Unreal Engine 4...
