us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i5 13400F 2.5GHz Socket 1700



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i5 13400F 2.5GHz Socket 1700

Testseek.com have collected 37 expert reviews of the Intel Core i5 13400F 2.5GHz Socket 1700 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i5 13400F 2.5GHz Socket 1700.
 
(80%)
37 Reviews
Users
(89%)
350 Reviews
80 0 100 37

The editors liked

  • Great price/performance ratio
  • Low cost of entry
  • Cheaper than any Zen 4 CPU available
  • Good gaming performance
  • Faster than Zen 3 in gaming (except 5800X3D)
  • Incredible energy efficiency
  • Support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory
  • CPU cooler included
  • Compatible
  • Good performance for the price
  • Power-frugal
  • Doesn't need lavish cooling

The editors didn't like

  • 12600K is same price and faster
  • Gaming performance considerably lower than 13600K
  • No multiplier-based overclocking
  • Only PCIe x8 graphics when Gen 5 M.2 slot in-use
  • No support for AVX512
  • Low clock frequencies
  • No L2 cache upgrade
  • Only four E-Cores

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2023-03-23, Author: translated , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • Intel Core i5-12400F, Core i7-12700, Core i5-13400, Core i7-13700 and Core i7-13700K compared, provided by SchenkerRegardless of whether you are looking at an Alder Lake S or a Raptor Lake S CPU, all the processors we tested held up pretty well. However...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2023-03-06, Author: W1zzard , review by: techpowerup.com

  • Great price/performance ratio, Low cost of entry, cheaper than any Zen 4 CPU available, Good gaming performance, Faster than Zen 3 in gaming (except 5800X3D), Incredible energy efficiency, Support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, CPU cooler included, Compatible
  • 12600K is same price and faster, Gaming performance considerably lower than 13600K, No multiplier-based overclocking, Only PCIe x8 graphics when Gen 5 M.2 slot in-use, No support for AVX512
  • The Intel Core i5-13400F is currently available online for $200. Great price/performance ratio Low cost of entry, cheaper than any Zen 4 CPU available Good gaming performance Faster than Zen 3 in gaming (except 5800X3D) Incredible energy efficiency Suppo...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2023-02-25, review by: topnewreview.com

  • Good performance for the price, Power-frugal, Doesn't need lavish cooling,
  • Low clock frequencies, No L2 cache upgrade, Only four E-Cores
  • 8.1 Total ScoreEditor choice INTEL CORE i5-13400F ReviewDecent performance for the price, and it also benefits from compatibility with cheap motherboards and DDR4 memory...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2023-01-16, Author: translated , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • Our measurements and benchmark scores show that Alder Lake-U processors can make sense, but both Intel as well as notebook manufacturers make it rather difficult for the customer. There are multiple factors for this, starting with the sheer number of Inte...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2024-03-27, review by: pcgamesn.com

  • AlternativesCore i5 13400F specsThese are the Intel Core i5 13400F specifications:Base clock P-Core 2.5GHz, E-Core 1.8GHzMax boost clock P-Core 4.6GHz, E-Core 3.3GHzCore Raptor LakeManufacturing process 10nmP-Cores 6E-Cores 4Threads 16Cache 20MB L3, 9.5MB...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2023-03-24, Author: Sebastian , review by: notebookcheck.org

  • Intel Core i5-12400F, Core i7-12700, Core i5-13400, Core i7-13700 y Core i7-13700K comparados, proporcionados por SchenkerIndependientemente de si se trata de una CPU Alder Lake S o Raptor Lake S, todos los procesadores que probamos aguantaron bastante bi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2023-04-17, Author: Sébastien , review by: cowcotland.com

  • Très équilibré, Est capable de tout, Ne chauffe quasiment pas, Consommation très faible, Compatible DDR4, Abordable
  • On cherche encore
  • ConclusionQue dire de mal de ce 13400F ? Et bien pas grand-chose… Mise à part qu’il nous pousse à nous poser des questions à Cowcotland. Il va peut-être falloir qu’on change nos logiciels pour juger les processeurs actuels, parce qu’on entre dans une ère...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2023-03-27, review by: notebookcheck.biz

  • Abstract:  Les processeurs Alder Lake et Raptor Lake d'Intel sont toujours très demandés - probablement en raison des bonnes performances de leur socket 1700...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2023-03-24, review by: notebookcheck.biz

  • Comparaison des Intel Core i5-12400F, Core i7-12700, Core i5-13400, Core i7-13700 et Core i7-13700K, fournie par SchenkerQu'il s'agisse d'un processeur Alder Lake S ou Raptor Lake S, tous les processeurs que nous avons testés ont plutôt bien résisté. Cepe...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2023-03-24, review by: notebookcheck.biz

  • Comparaison des Intel Core i5-12400F, Core i7-12700, Core i5-13400, Core i7-13700 et Core i7-13700K, fournie par SchenkerQu'il s'agisse d'un processeur Alder Lake S ou Raptor Lake S, tous les processeurs que nous avons testés ont plutôt bien résisté. Cepe...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×