us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775

Testseek.com have collected 84 expert reviews of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775.
Award: Most Awarded January 2008
January 2008
 
(83%)
84 Reviews
Users
(90%)
115 Reviews
83 0 100 84

The editors liked

  • Still Extremely Fast
  • QuadCore FTW
  • Rock Stable
  • Power
  • Fastest quadcore desktop processor on the planet at time of publication!
  • 50% larger L2 cache at the same TDP of 130W!
  • Higher CPU multipliers are unlocked!
  • Larger L2 cache. Good overclocking potential. SSE4 instructions and architectural improvements.
  • Larger L2 cache
  • Good overclocking potential
  • SSE4 instructions and architectural improvements.
  • Fastest high-end desktop chip on the market
  • New specialized instructions should further improve performance with supporting software.
  • Fastest consumer CPU yet
  • Runs cool
  • SSE4 instruction set can dramatically speed apps that support it
  • Top Desktop Performer
  • Excellent Power Usage Numbers
  • Media Creation Powerhouse

The editors didn't like

  • Will be Very Expensive when released
  • Needs a newer motherboard that supports 1333Mhz FSB.
  • Really expensive. Purchase automatically confirms your ULTRALICH status!
  • Performance gains limited over current generation CPUs in current apps. Expensive.
  • Performance gains limited over current generation CPUs in current apps
  • Expensive.
  • Expensive
  • New chips coming out from AMD are an unknown factor
  • More complete Intel architecture redesign only a year away.
  • Few apps support four cores (and even fewer support SSE4)
  • 3.0 GHz Clock Speed

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: vr-zone.com

  • For Gamers : Core 2 Extreme QX9650 performs quite decent in the slew of new games and will especially help when they require more physics calculations during game play. However, if you are already having a QX6850 or E6850, then it is unwise to dump the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • Abstract:  While we mere humans have to conform to our natural biological clocks, microprocessor giant Intel - the Chipzilla - follows Silicon Cadence (also known as tick-tock), a strategic time line designed to introduce new microprocessor technology and manufac...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2007-11-10, review by: tbreak.ae

  • As the benchmarks show in the previous pages, the QX9650 is certainly no slouch. It came up right at the top in pretty much every benchmark we tested it with which goes on to show that the improvements that Intel has made to the architecture clearly wo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-25, review by: hardwaremx.com

  • No cabe duda que estamos parados frente al procesador de escritorio más rápido del planeta (a la fecha de esta publicación); no creemos que hayan inventado algo que no se haya visto, mas sí podemos ver una evolución importante en...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-11-07, review by: presence-pc.com

  • Abstract:  Véritable cerveau de l’ordinateur, le processeur se doit d’être choisi avec le plus grand soin. En effet, si le nombre de fabricants de processeurs x86 grand public s’est réduit comme une peau de chagrin au fil des ans, la quantité de modèles différent...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-10-28, review by: clubic.com

  • Abstract:  Parmi les sujets que nous réclament à corps et à cris nos lecteurs depuis des années, il y a la réalisation d'un large comparatif de processeurs. Souvent lorsque nous nous intéressons à un nouveau modèle de processeur, nous le comparons à la génération...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-08, review by: bestofmicro.com

  • Abstract:  Dans l’éternelle guerre concurrentielle qui se déroule sur le marché des processeurs, Intel gère actuellement son avance sur son rival de toujours, AMD. Ce dernier a en effet perdu la tête de la compétition depuis le la...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: laruche.com

  • Il ne faut jamais jurer de rien, y compris en informatique. Voilà une phrase qui illustre à merveille les sorties de produits majeurs. C’est valable du côté des cartes graphiques avec ATI qui a eu le vent en poupe très longtemps après la sortie de l...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: clubic.com

  • Arrivés au terme de cet article et passé les pages de performances, il faudrait être bien difficile pour ne pas saluer positivement larrivée du Penryn. Alors que la dernière transition en terme de procédé de fabrication avait laissé chez Intel de bien...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: revioo.com

  • Il reste un aspect de ce Penryn que je n’ai pas pu tester faute de moyen: sa consomation. Intel nous annonce qu’à fréquence équivalente le Penryn consomme 60W de moins en charge que son prédesceceur. Il s’agit certes d’une donnée m...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×