us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i5 2500K 3.3GHz Socket 1155



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i5 2500K 3.3GHz Socket 1155

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the Intel Core i5 2500K 3.3GHz Socket 1155 and the average rating is 91%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i5 2500K 3.3GHz Socket 1155.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2011
January 2011
 
(91%)
224 Reviews
Users
(96%)
1604 Reviews
91 0 100 224

The editors liked

  • New Sandy Bridge Architecture
  • Blazing Fast Cache Speeds
  • Intel HD Graphics 3000
  • New AVX Instruction Support
  • Improved Productivity
  • Intel Quick Sync
  • InTru 3D
  • Improved Turbo Boost
  • Fully Unlocked (CPU and GPU)
  • Great compute performance
  • New 32nm GPU process
  • Very Low TDP
  • Improved AESNI
  • Strong overall computing performance for the price. Good media-processing capabilities. Unlocked multiplier for simplified overclocking.
  • Excellent performance
  • Great Price
  • Runs very cool
  • GPU performance greatly improved compared to last generation
  • Up to 4x AA support
  • 32 nm CPU
  • Plenty of computation power
  • GPU fully integrated in the CPU die
  • Support for DirectX 10.1
  • Turbo Boost increases GPU clock
  • HDMI Audio bitstreaming supported
  • H
  • Very fast performance for the price
  • Unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking
  • Great performance
  • 1.2GHz overclock
  • Overclocking is made easy with a P67 motherboard
  • 95W TDP and low CPU temperatures
  • Very fast
  • Much improved power efficiency over last generation and competitor's processor
  • Runs really cool
  • Improvements over previous generation
  • Improved integrated graphics
  • Overclocks really easily with K models
  • Full hardware transcoding support
  • Cost-efficient

The editors didn't like

  • None
  • No Hyperthreading
  • Does not support Hyper-Threading. Onboard video lacks DirectX 11 support
  • Power of discrete video cards. Requires new motherboard.
  • Requires new motherboards
  • Confusing name scheme
  • No support for DirectX 11
  • Limited GPU performance
  • Drivers not as mature as the ones from ATI or NVIDIA
  • No support for CUDA
  • PhysX
  • OpenCL
  • New chipset requirements mean you'll need a new Socket 1155 motherboard
  • Integrated graphics performance still slow compared to cheap dedicated 3D cards
  • Cannot be overclocked on a H67 motherboard
  • Consumers need to buy a new motherboard on top of purchasing the CPU
  • NonK models have limited overclocking potential

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 7 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-22, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In this article we're going to check gaming performance of Intels LGA 1155 Sandy Bridge CPUs when they're being supported by a Radeon HD 7970 graphics card from XFX. We're curious if there will be a measurable performance gaps between these two CPUs regar...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-05, review by: XSreviews.co.uk

  • Interestingly while the 2500k walked all over the aging 760 in our synthetic tests, it didn’t faire quite so well in the gaming ones. Probably some naff titles to choose as evidently they arn’t CPU bottlenecked. Still, this is an impressive chip with ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-26, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't have multiple cores? We take 16 different CPUs and compare them all using a single core running at 3 GHz. Ev...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-01-07, review by: HEXUS.net

  • Intel's Sandy Bridge processors represent a genuine step forward in chip evolution. Now packing in refined, efficient CPU cores and an improved GPU on to the same portion of silicon, Intel has done away with the need for chipset-based graphics for good...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-04, review by: techradar.com

  • Breathtaking performance at stock clocks, Massive overclocking headroom, Incredible new integrated video engine
  • Infuriating marketing-driven restrictions
  • If it wasn't for Intel's marketing goons, these could have been the best CPUs in history. Awesome, even so...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: vortez.net

  • Abstract:  Those looking to upgrade in Q1 should look no further if they are on a budget as Sandy Bridge within the i5 realm certainly offers outstanding performance. The 2500K is there for the taking, and will appeal to enthusiasts on a budget. Combine it with a mainstream motherboard and you are the envy of your..

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge, this is the codename of Intels latest CPU generation which is based on an overworked Nehalem microarchitecture. We had the chance to test two of the upcoming CPUs, namely the Core i7 2600K and the Core i5 2500K. They both come with an imp...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Although the processing cores in Intel’s Sandy Bridge architecture are decidedly similar to Nehalem, the integration of on-die graphics and a ring bus improves performance for mainstream users. Intel’s Quick Sync is this design’s secret weapon, though....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 7 of 23 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×