us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i7 2700K 3.5GHz Socket 1155



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 2700K 3.5GHz Socket 1155

Testseek.com have collected 61 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 2700K 3.5GHz Socket 1155 and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 2700K 3.5GHz Socket 1155.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2012
April 2012
 
(86%)
61 Reviews
Users
(97%)
504 Reviews
86 0 100 61

The editors liked

  • The fastest Sandy Bridge chip available. Good for overclocking.

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive for a mainstream processor. Integrated video capabilities are insufficient for enthusiasts. Not much faster than the Core i7-2600K

 

Reviews

page 2 of 7
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-22, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Performance with applications, Performance with games, Turbo mode and HyperThreading, Reasonable power consumption, Integrated graphics chip can improve video decoding/encoding and support 3D Bluray content
  • Integrated graphics chip doesn't support DirectX 11, which would have improved the bitrate in some games.
  • Intel's latest generation of CPUs effectively picks up where the last one left off. Performance has been ratcheted up a notch and power consumption has been pushed down. This all-rounder is a real success. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-01, review by: techradar.com

  • The fastest CPU in the real world, Lots of overclocking headroom
  • Barely any better than the old 2600K, No new features
  • A great chip, but barely any better than the 2600K. Hardly worth Intel's bother bringing it out...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-28, review by: eteknix.com

  • Abstract:  We've known for a little while now, that Intel had something up their sleeves with regards to Sandybridge and now that the cat is out of the bag, we can shout out that it's the i7 2700k. Taking over as the Sandy Bridge flagship processor is quite vital in...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-10-27, review by: kitguru.net

  • 1.5 ghz overclock on air with modest cooling, new performance leader in sub £300 sector, efficient power consumption, Unlocked, Overclockers will love it,
  • Nothing, Kitguru says: The new sub £300 performance leader and a bargain buy considering the performance available when overclocked, Rating: 9.0, Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13, Share, Facebook, Twitter, Google +, Stumbleupon, LinkedIn, Pinterest, T
  • The Core i7 2700k has been released in a very low key manner. The plan was that Intel would release the new chip to redress the performance balance brought to market by AMD's FX 8150 Black Edition. As we all know by now, AMD's FX failed to excite the enth...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  We will be running each through a selection of real world tests to establish how they compare to the latest offerings from AMD, and finding out how well they overclock using the unlocked multiplier.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-24, Author: Eric , review by: comptoir-hardware.com

  • Abstract:  En juin 2006, Intel abandonnait sa tant décriée microarchitecture Netburst pour lancer Core, renonçant dès lors à la course à la fréquence au profit de l'efficacité pour un résultat que l'on connait : jamais le fondeur n'a depuis cédé le trône des perform...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-12, Author: Eric , review by: comptoir-hardware.com

  • Abstract:  En juin 2006, Intel abandonnait sa tant décriée microarchitecture Netburst pour lancer Core, renonçant dès lors à la course à la fréquence au profit de l'efficacité pour un résultat que l'on connait : jamais le fondeur n'a depuis cédé le trône des perform...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-11-07, review by: presence-pc.com

  • Abstract:  Véritable cerveau de l’ordinateur, le processeur se doit d’être choisi avec le plus grand soin. En effet, si le nombre de fabricants de processeurs x86 grand public s’est réduit comme une peau de chagrin au fil des ans, la quantité de modèles différent...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 7 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×