us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i7 4770K 3.5GHz Socket 1150



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 4770K 3.5GHz Socket 1150

Testseek.com have collected 316 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 4770K 3.5GHz Socket 1150 and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 4770K 3.5GHz Socket 1150.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2013
June 2013
 
(86%)
316 Reviews
Users
(95%)
2681 Reviews
86 0 100 316

The editors liked

  • Reasonably priced
  • Overall improved performance
  • Quick Sync
  • HyperThreading
  • Improved HD video performance
  • Unlocked
  • Low Power Consumption
  • 22nm
  • Intel's latest architecture adds new features. Improved performance.
  • Better IGP
  • Faster / Better Quick Sync
  • Some CPU Performance Improvements
  • BCLK Straps
  • Incrementally better top-end CPU performance for mainstream CPUs
  • Another big step up for integrated graphics performance
  • Unlocked for overclocking
  • Still the best singlecore performance available
  • Dramatically improved iGPU performance
  • Mobile versions offer new ultralowpower modes
  • At least Intel didn't change the cooler mounting points
  • GPU performance greatly improved compared to last generation
  • Support for DirectX 11
  • Driver maturity improved
  • Turbo Boost to dynamically adjust graphics clocks
  • Completely noiseless
  • HDMI Audio bitstreaming supported
  • Added GPU overclocking capability v
  • Better performance upgrade than Ivy
  • More overclocking options
  • Better overclocking potential
  • If you keep it cool!
  • Improved integrated memory controller
  • Overclocking memory improves performance
  • Haswell’s 3D transistor technology favors mobile
  • Good price
  • Great performance for its price
  • Better iGPU performance than HD 4000
  • Low power consumption under both idle and load
  • High performance
  • Includes HyperThreading Technology
  • Good price to performance ratio
  • Added speed
  • Better thermal interface material
  • Performance slightly better than the Intel Core i74770K when overclocked
  • Great performance
  • Integrated graphics have been much improved over Ivy Bridge
  • CPU cooler mounting points have not changed with new socket
  • Low power states
  • Includes Hyper-Threading technology
  • Better temperatures than Ivy Bridge series
  • Good price based on performance
  • Very low power consumption under both idle and load
  • More memory overclocking options
  • Slightly better performance
  • Efficiency and graphics for the same price as Ivy Bridge. New architecture is the begining of the road ahead for Intel CPUs.

The editors didn't like

  • ATX (304.80 millimeters [12.00 inches] x 243.84 millimeters
  • [9.60 inches])
  • Temperatures will become a factor when performance tuning
  • Not the performance gains expected with the new Generation
  • Draws slightly more power than previous designs. Less headroom for overclocking
  • Requires New Mobo / Socket
  • Not Much Faster Than Ivy Bridge
  • Only slightly speedier than previous-generation counterpart
  • Not backward-compatible with earlier motherboards
  • Only incremental CPU performance improvements over Ivy Bridge
  • New socket means a new motherboard is required for upgrades
  • Still only 16 PCIE lanes
  • Relatively poor overclocking
  • Limited GPU performance
  • GT3 (with embedded DRAM) not available on LGA1150
  • The Core i74770K operates slightly hotter than Core i73770K
  • Overclocking requires more patience than Ivy and Sandy
  • The overclocking learning curve is definitely higher
  • Really high temperature under load
  • Low overclocking potential
  • Small performance increase versus Core i53570K
  • High temperature under load
  • Compared to the price gap
  • The speed difference to the Intel Core i74770K is not very noticeable
  • Overclocking seems to be more sensitive to BCLK adjustments
  • Not a drastic improvement over Ivy Bridge
  • Another new socket
  • Weak overclocking
  • Lower possible overclock than the Ivy Bridge series
  • With no tangible competition in the desktop realm
  • Intel is no longer focused on raw performance
  • So there's even less to see in that respect this year. New platform/socket is not welcome.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 32
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, Author: Carl , review by: HardCOREware.net

  • If you were thinking that Haswell would be “the one you’ve all been waiting for” you are probably going to be somewhat disappointed. As mentioned on the first page, Haswell was all about mobile and all-in-one platforms. It’s not that Intel is neglecting...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, Author: hokiealumnus , review by: overclockers.com

  • Haswell is a solid step forward for Intel's microarchitecture design. Its improvement over the Sandy-to-Ivy Bridge processor shrink is palpable and impressive. It overclocks well on ambient cooling – especially our sample – but that overclocking level ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, Author: Anand , review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  This is a very volatile time for Intel. In an ARM-less vacuum, Intel's Haswell architecture would likely be the most amazing thing to happen to the tech industry in years. In mobile Haswell is slated to bring about the single largest improvement in batter...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, review by: hardocp.com

  • My experience for the last couple of weeks with Haswell has been a good time. It has been a lot of fun working with the new architecture and I had some really good feelings about it, but going back and truly analyzing the benchmark data, it left me feelin...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, review by: madshrimps.be

  • Intel's latest Haswell has finally landed. The rate at which Intel pumps out new CPUs never stops to amaze your humble reviewer. We are accustomed to this behaviour with the ever lasting performance battle between Nvidia and AMD/ATI. Yet Intel, perfor...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • The Intel Core i7-4770K processor along with the robust features found on Z87 platforms make for a desktop solution that will last for years. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Intel obviously refocused all their efforts on resolving the “ARM problem”. The microprocessor giant obviously doesn’t want to hand over the compact mobile devices market to the competition, therefore all their engineering forced have been directed to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.com

  • AMD introduced us to its Kabini and Temash SoCs one week ago. Naturally, we were excited to learn more about the Jaguar architecture, to see GCN rolled into a truly low-power configuration, and most of all, to get our hands on the devices AMD was promisin...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, Author: Joel , review by: pcmag.com

  • Intel's latest architecture adds new features. Improved performance.
  • Draws slightly more power than previous designs. Less headroom for overclocking
  • The Intel Core i7-4770K, based on Intel's Haswell microarchitecture, is a great chip if you need an upgrade, but performance gains are modest....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-06-01, review by: hothardware.com

  • Better IGP, Faster / Better Quick Sync, Some CPU Performance Improvements, BCLK Straps
  • Requires New Mobo / Socket, Not Much Faster Than Ivy Bridge
  • The Core i7-4770K's integrated Intel HD 4600 series graphics engine is clearly superior to the HD 4000 graphics in the 3770K, however. In every instance, the HD 4600 series GPU outran the HD 4000, sometimes by a large margin. Quick Sync video encoding was...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
    page 5 of 32 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 32   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×