us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i7 5960X Extreme Edition 3GHz Socket 2011-3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 5960X Extreme Edition 3GHz Socket 2011-3

Testseek.com have collected 249 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 5960X Extreme Edition 3GHz Socket 2011-3 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 5960X Extreme Edition 3GHz Socket 2011-3.
Award: Editor’s Choice September 2014
September 2014
 
(90%)
249 Reviews
Users
(93%)
825 Reviews
90 0 100 249

The editors liked

  • Most powerful consumer CPU available. Massive performance
  • With highly threaded workloads. Overclocked well.
  • 8 Cores/16 Threads
  • Improved MultiThreaded Performance
  • 20MB (Smart Cache)
  • HyperThreading
  • Improved Compute Performance
  • Unlocked
  • Low Power Consumption
  • 22nm
  • Killer MultiThread Performance
  • Huge Cache
  • HaswellBased EUs
  • Lower Power
  • Most powerful consumer CPU available
  • As of late summer 2014
  • Massive performance with highly threaded workloads
  • Our review chip overclocked well
  • Epic 8 core – 16 thread computing
  • Improved thermal design works!
  • Overclockable up to 4.6 GHz (so far)
  • Best of class performance
  • 8 cores
  •  best performance
  • Very low temp
  • Excellent overclocking
  • A new level of performance in a “consumer” CPU
  • Easily overclockable processor
  • 48 (total) PCIE lanes as compared to the 24 lanes of an LGA1150 system
  • First use of DDR4 memory
  • 8 cores and 16 threads
  • Unlocked base clock multiplier
  • Easy and impressive overclocking
  • Runs cooler than other chips
  • Brings DDR4 to the consumer level
  • With eight cores
  • A 20MB L3 cache
  • 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes
  • DDR4 support
  • Decent overclocking and Intel's new X99 chipset
  • The Core i75960X is destined for dream machines.

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive. Stock clock speed is lower than previous-generation Extreme Edition chip. Not compatible with previous-gen Socket 2011 motherboards or DDR3 RAM. Less powerful chips with higher clock speeds perform better on tasks that aren't heavily threaded
  • Decreased Frequency Compared to Core i7 4960X
  • DDR4 Memory Still in Infancy
  • Pricey
  • Relatively Low Clocks
  • Lower Single Thread Perf In Some Tests
  • As ever with Extreme Edition chips
  • Lower stock clock speed than previous-generation Extreme Edition chip
  • Not compatible with previous-gen Socket 2011 motherboards or DDR3 RAM
  • Lesser chips with higher clock speeds perform better on tasks that ar
  • Premium performance at a premium cost
  • Price
  • Very
  • Very expensive for a desktop CPU
  • Requires new X99 motherboard and new DDR4 memory
  • Singlecore performance lags behind that of much less expensive 4790K
  • No CPU cooler included
  • None that I found
  • It doesn't offer much of an advantage over mainstream chips for gaming and in scenarios where there is a solid speed boost
  • At $1
  • 050 you'll be paying a largely disproportionate premium for it.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 6 of 25
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-08-29, Author: ccokeman , review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Multi threaded performance, Overclocking with eight cores, Eight cores, Thermal performance
  • Low base clock speed
  • It's good to finally have Intel refresh the Extreme line up and take that step up to an eight core processor to do it. There are distributed computing crunchers just salivating at the performance potential that comes along with the added four threads that...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-08-31, Author: Shawn , review by: tweaktown.com

  • You would be extremely hard pressed to say that you don't want this CPU. You could say that it's too expensive for you, you could say that it's just too expensive for what it is. You can say a lot of things, but saying you don't want this setup doesn't r...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(93%)
 
  Published: 2018-11-08, Author: Luca , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  These days there are basically two different groups of customers who demand lots of processing power: content creators and gamers, while this 2D performance comparison is targeting content creators. After having had a look at the following pages you'll ha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-05-06, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • I can see the Ryzen 5 2600 and the 2600X fast becoming the most popular chips of the second generation Ryzen launch. They're fast, they're affordable, and they're easy to keep cool and overclock. I mean, if you're just doing a massive amount of rendering...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-07-13, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • DefaultFirst of all we're going to have a closer look at performance differences with standard clock speeds From our overall performance rating we see that the Core i76900K is on average 796 % quicker than the Core i75960X If we start searching for the be...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-06-15, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • DefaultFirst of all we're going to have a closer look at performance differences with standard clock speeds From our overall performance rating we see that the Core i76950X is on average 1655 % quicker than the Core i75960XIf we start searching for the be...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-12-18, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • DefaultFirst of all we're going to have a closer look at performance differences with standard clock speeds From our overall performance rating we see that the Core i75960X is on average 1609% quicker than the Core i75930K If you keep in mind, that the i7...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 25 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 25   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×