us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i9 7900X 3.3GHz Socket R4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i9 7900X 3.3GHz Socket R4

Testseek.com have collected 267 expert reviews of the Intel Core i9 7900X 3.3GHz Socket R4 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i9 7900X 3.3GHz Socket R4.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2017
June 2017
 
(83%)
267 Reviews
Users
(87%)
659 Reviews
83 0 100 267

The editors liked

  • Great Multi-threaded Performance
  • Very Reasonable Price
  • Far easier overclocking than Haswell and Broadwell
  • The i9-7900X is the most powerful consumer CPU money can buy
  • High clock speeds out of the box
  • Improved memory support
  • Modern complement of IO
  • Lots of PCIe lanes (with an i9-7900X at least)
  • Freak777power 14 hours ago
  • Pros
  • 10/20 cost now $999
  • 10 cores and 20 processing threads
  • For $700 less than last year's comparable chip
  • Single-threaded performance on par with Core i7-7700K
  • 10 cores and 20 processing threads for $999
  • Speedy single-threaded performance
  • Strong Performance
  • Good Overclockers
  • Feature Packed Platform
  • Fastest Desktop Processors To Date
  • Great multi-core performance
  • Improved single-core performance
  • Best performing desktop processor to date
  • Easy to overclock
  • Current LGA2011v3 CPU coolers will work
  • X299 platform is great
  • Strong single-core performance
  • Beats Threadripper 1950X at multi-threaded media encoding
  • Monolithic quad-channel memory interface
  • Fewer things to configure
  • Plenty of aftermarket cooling solutions
  • SkylakeX topped our performance charts
  • Bringing a much better value over BroadwellE on the highend

The editors didn't like

  • The i9-7900X costs £900/$1000
  • AMD's Ryzen offers 75 percent of the performance for well under half the price
  • The quad-core i7-7740X makes no sense—buy a 7700K instead
  • Confusing product stack that limits platform features
  • Power hungry
  • Requires a £100
  • Freak777power 14 hours ago
  • Runs hot when overclocked
  • Similar gaming issues at 1080p as AMD Ryzen chips
  • New LGA 2066 socket requires a new (and expensive) motherboard
  • Still pricey compared to Ryzen 7
  • Relatively pricey
  • Requires new
  • Expensive motherboard
  • Not the fastest at Full HD gaming
  • Runs hot
  • Differing PCIe Lane Configurations May Cause Confusion
  • Pricing May Change When ThreadRipper Arrives
  • Staggered released
  • Still 4 Core i9 processors yet to come out
  • Prices could change with Ryzen ThreadRipper comes out
  • High price
  • High idle power draw
  • No ECC memory support
  • Fewer PCIe lanes than Threadripper
  • It's extremely power hungry and considerably more expensive than Ryzen equivalents

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • Abstract:  Intel's past few weeks have seen the company enduring the ire of a large portion of the tech community, perhaps undeservedly in some instances -- certainly deservedly in others. We criticized the company for its initial marketing of the 7900X – but then...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • It's time once more to sum up our results using our famous scatter plots. To spit out this final index, we take the geometric mean of each chip's results in our real-world productivity tests, then plot that number against retail pricing gleaned from Newe...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • In some circles of the Internet, the Core i9 release and the parts that were announced last month from Intel seem as obvious a reaction to AMD's Ryzen processor and Threadripper as could be shown. In truth, it's hard to see the likes of the Core i9-7900X...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • The year 2017 turns out to become the most exciting year for desktop processorssince maybe even a decade. AMD released Ryzen, Intel reacted. Then all of the sudden it became apparent that AMD had hidden a high-end desktop processor called Threadripper, an...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • freak777power 14 hours ago, Pros: 10/20 cost now $999
  • freak777power 14 hours ago
  • Intel's Skylake-X-based Core i9-7900X weighs in with 10 Hyper-Threaded cores and architectural enhancements that benefit many workstation-class workloads, such as rendering and content creation. The processor struggles in some games compared to its pr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Dave , review by: hothardware.com

  • Strong Performance, Good Overclockers, Feature Packed Platform, Fastest Desktop Processors To Date
  • Differing PCIe Lane Configurations May Cause Confusion, Pricing May Change When ThreadRipper Arrives
  • The Intel Core i9-7900X is easily the most powerful desktop processor we have tested to date. Its combination of 10-cores, with relatively high clocks, and larger L2 cache propel it into the lead in all of the multi-threaded benchmarks. The Core i7-7900X'...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • So now that we have run through the X299 and Core X features and taken a look at the performance of the i9-7900X and the i7-7740X, where does everything land. Well first off, let me say right out of the hole that you have to keep in mind that X299 and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com

  • For Skylake-X, and by virtue the Skylake-SP core we will see in upcoming Skylake-SP Xeons, Intel decided to make a few changes this time around. The biggest microarchitecture change comes in three stages: the addition of an AVX-512 unit, the adjustment in...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-19, Author: Earthdog , review by: overclockers.com

  • So where did we end up with these CPUs? In a nutshell, the 7900K brought some minor IPC improvements in some areas in our our testing, while the 7740K is simply a faster 7700K on a more robust platform.Our testing, due to a not fully optimized AIDA64 test...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-30, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  I'm going to start this article off with a simple number: five. Not only is that the number of months it has taken AMD to effectively turn the x86 processor world on its ear, but that's also the number of distinct model families that they've introduced...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 27 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×