Testseek.com have collected 61 expert reviews of the Intel Compute Stick STK2M3 and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Compute Stick STK2M3.
April 2016
(74%)
61 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(82%)
1048 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
74010061
The editors liked
A decent multipurpose PC in a tiny package
Bloat-free Windows 10
USB Type-C adapter also doubles as a USB hub
Improving the stick's versatility
Relatively respectable performance and power consumption
4GB of RAM and 64GB of storage is a big improveme
Powerful enough for most computing tasks
Inexpensive
Very portable
Incredibly affordable Windows PC
Improves on previous generation with addition of a second USB port
Highly portable
Super portable
More powerful Skylake Core m3-6Y70 CPU
Double the RAM and storage of its predecessors
Three USB 3.0 ports
Expandable storage
802.11ac Wi-Fi
Tiny form factor
Enough performance and ports to serve as a mainstream productivity PC
Class-leading performance
Light
Compact design
Includes Windows 10
Plugs directly into an HDMI port on a monitor or TV
Plentiful memory and storage
Equipped with lots of expansion and connectivity options
Including three USB 3
0 ports
Three-year w
Dual USB Ports
4K output
Runs Windows 10 on a stick
This upgraded Intel Compute Stick has a faster Core m3 processor and extra USB ports on its power brick
Incredibly small form factor
Becomes preloaded with Windows 10
Low power consumption
An actual full-fledged PC able to do basic computer tasks
Intel made improvements over the 1st generation Compute Stick
The editors didn't like
Core m3 in a small stick is slower than it is in a laptop
Stick gets hot and fan gets loud
Lack of expandability relative to other desktops
Even the NUC
2GB of RAM limits multi-tasking
Still needs to be plugged into an AC adapter
Slower performance
Limited utility
EMMC storage is slow compared to SSDs
Price jumps to $349 versus $149 for the previous model
Expensive for what you get
Form factor is limiting
Port placement on power brick is clever
But implementation is cumbersome
Only one USB-C port
USB mouse and keyboard are required for initial wireless setup
Modest performance
Mediocre storage speed
More expensive than competitors
It's much more expensive than the original Atom versions
And loses one USB port on the stick itself. Onboard storage is minimal
2GB of memory limits it
If looking for a streaming device others are cheaper
Abstract: Mình đặc biệt thích mấy cái đồ công nghệ dạng "stick" dùng để cắm vô TV giải trí chơi, chúng ta đã có Android stick, Android box, Chromecast... là những thứ biến TV ngu thành TV thông minh thì bây giờ Intel đưa ra thêm một giải pháp nữa đó là thu nhỏ...
