us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Good Buy September 2015
September 2015
 
(82%)
162 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 162

The editors liked

  • Exceptionally powerful for a 6-inch
  • Air-cooled card
  • Easily outperforms any similarly sized Nvidia card currently available
  • Impressive power
  • Given its 6-inch size and air cooling
  • Outperforms similarly sized graphics cards
  • Mini-ITX-friendly form factor
  • Good Performance
  • Tiny Form Factor
  • Cool and Quiet
  • Power Efficient (Relatively Speaking)
  • Performance
  • Small form factor
  • Power consumption
  • Dead silent
  • Extremely compact
  • Power efficient
  • Dual BIOS
  • Support for AMD FreeSync
  • Supports AMD Virtual Super Resolution and Framerate Target Control
  • Measuring a mere 6" long
  • The R9 Nano brings 4K gaming performance to cases where the Fury X can't fit and it exceeds the GTX 980 Ti in efficiency.
  • Excellent at Full HD and 1440p resolutions
  • Very low power consumption
  • Relatively quiet
  • Fiji chip architecture
  • Compact design
  • Simpler air cooling
  • Compact
  • Quiet
  • Tiny
  • Efficient
  • Did we say small?
  • Condensed Milk

The editors didn't like

  • Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti perform better overall for about the same price
  • Lack of HDMI 2.0 support makes the card a tricky fit for gaming on a 4K HDTV
  • High cost means the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti are better options for the same price if you don't need the small size
  • Lacks HDMI 2
  • 0
  • Not Quite As Fast As A Fury
  • Premium Pricing
  • Inductor Noise
  • No HDMI 2.0
  • Price
  • Very expensive
  • No HDMI 2.0 support
  • Coil noise
  • Average clock speed well below advertised 1000 MHz
  • Fan doesn't turn off in idle
  • Complicated overclocking
  • No backplate
  • For the same $650
  • The GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are a bit faster. Coil noise is an issue on our sample and on high the fan isn't particularly quiet either. It is 2015 where is the HDMI 2.0 support?
  • Not really a 4K GPU
  • Too expensive for its specs
  • Cheaper GPUs deliver the same capabilities
  • Expensive
  • Not as fast as larger GPUs
  • 4GB VRAM
  • Niche
  • Sour Milk

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-01-22, Author: Bennett , review by: pcpowerplay.com.au

  • Ultra small, Full-sized performance, Quiet cooler
  • Very expensive, No HDMI 2.0, Only 4GB memory
  • If price is no obstacle and size is everything, the Nano lives in a class unto itself, with no competitors...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-11-12, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • "There's simply no other card of this size that can compete with the Nano."...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-25, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Highend gaming performance, Efficient for a Fiji GPU, Teeny weeny
  • Superexpensive, Size is less of a miniITX issue now, 4GB HBM limit, Coil whine
  • The Radeon R9 Nano matches impressive scale with high-end performance, but the price is prohibitive especially when size is really not so much of an issue anymore...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-16, Author: Anthony , review by: tweaktown.com

  • Previous PageNext PageShopping InformationPRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-02-14, Author: Farzin , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Both Warhammer and Total War are popular game series, however this isn't the only reason as to why the new game Total War: Warhammer is interesting. The game also has a DirectX 12 mode. In this review we test Warhammar with 20 GPUs in DirectX 12: the numb...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-11-02, Author: Rikki , review by: eteknix.com

  • Great performance, Quiet operation at low loads, HBM is innovative, Extremely low power consumption for performance, Compact size is ideal for small form factor,
  • Crossfire R9 Nano’s defeats the ideal of small form factor suitability, Neutral, 4GB HBM is good for now, but very little future-proofing, “The R9 Nano in Crossfire is an amazing achievement for AMD and a great step in the right direction for the future o
  • PriceSince the initial launch of the R9 Fury X, HBMv1 stock levels and prices have plateaued. This has resulted in the R9 Nano being available for as little as £469.99 from OverclockersUK. In the US, the R9 Nano range has slightly dropped in price and can...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-10-05, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk

  • Well worth the Gamer Approved Award.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(92%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-26, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com

  • High, end gaming performance, Efficient for a Fiji GPU, Teeny weeny
  • Super, expensive, Size is less of a mini, ITX issue now, 4GB HBM limit, Coil whine
  • The Radeon R9 Nano matches impressive scale with high-end performance, but the price is prohibitive especially when size is really not so much of an issue anymore...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-21, Author: Mike , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Tiny design – small enough for mini-ITX, Stonking performance at high resolutions, High Bandwidth Memory used
  • Ruinously expensive, High-pitched capacitor whine, A little slower than current flagships
  • AMD's latest card is one of its most outlandish and impressive. It's the first time I've seen true high-end power inside a card that's small enough to comfortably fit inside a mini-ITX chassis – and it achieves this without becoming too hot or loud. It...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-16, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Great performance for its size, Arguably preferable to the Fury X
  • Other cards already accomplish its goal, Expensive, Can't handle 4K in every game
  • The R9 Nano is a novel idea for a card. It's built on the theory that gamers want a card with high performance in a small package. Whether that's true or not remains to be seen, but either way, the R9 Nano is unlikely to satisfy those in the market for...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 4 of 17 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×