us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB GDDR5 PCle



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB GDDR5 PCle

Testseek.com have collected 256 expert reviews of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB GDDR5 PCle and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB GDDR5 PCle.
Award: Most Awarded February 2014
February 2014
 
(82%)
256 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 256

The editors liked

  • New Maxwell architecture
  • No power-supply connector required on certain models
  • Compact design and low power requirements are great for budget-PC upgraders
  • Great Power Characteristics
  • Good Performance
  • Nice Overclocking Headroom
  • Small
  • Cool
  • And Quiet
  • Amazing power efficiency. Single-slot design works well with small-form-factor PCs.
  • Epic power consumption improvements
  • Most power efficient GPU ever built
  • Quiet
  • Good overclocking potential
  • No power connector required
  • Low temperatures
  • Support for CUDA/PhysX

The editors didn't like

  • Performance doesn't outpace similarly priced AMD alternatives
  • Overclocked cards will require six-pin power connector
  • No SLI
  • Trails the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
  • Flat performance compared with previous generation
  • Relatively high price
  • NVIDIA power limiter restricts overclocking
  • Card could easily be single slot
  • No SLI support

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 26
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-03-07, Author: Joel , review by: pcmag.com

  • Amazing power efficiency. Single-slot design works well with small-form-factor PCs.
  • Flat performance compared with previous generation
  • The Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti graphics card sets a new record for low-power, high-efficiency performance....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-02-27, Author: Alex , review by: extremespec.net

  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is formed on the basis of a new graphics core NVIDIA GM107, the first representative of 28nm microarchitecture NVIDIA Maxwell, excellent work of NVIDIA to optimize energy consumption. In the end, we got almost identical perform...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-24, review by: techgage.com

  • We discovered above that the 750 Ti is much more power-efficient than AMD's R7 260X (and no doubt the R7 265, as well), and it also runs a lot cooler. But power and temperatures are not all that matters with a GPU, so overall, how does the GTX 750 Ti fa...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-02-24, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • The GeForce GTX 750 Ti graphics card features Nvidia’s GM107 chip with new Maxwell architecture. Designed for higher energy efficiency, the GPU indeed boasts an unprecedented performance-per-watt ratio. Compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, which has mo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-23, Author: Ryan , review by: anandtech.com

  • Starting from an architectural point of view, it's clear from the very start that Maxwell is both a refresh of the Kepler architecture and at the same time oh so much more. I think from a feature perspective it's going to be difficult not to be a bit disa...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-21, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  Back on Tuesday I delivered a launch-day review of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on Linux. This first graphics card built on NVIDIA's new Maxwell architecture has been running fantastic under Linux for being a mid-range graphics card. The GM107 GPU core f...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-20, review by: pcgamer.com

  • A quality little debut for Maxwell, offering decent performance incredibly efficiently, while also hinting at the future possibilities for the architecture...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(88%)
 
  Published: 2014-02-19, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • We've answered the architectural efficiency question. Now let's look at raw value, in terms of price and performance. Even though we're using a geometric mean to average performance across the five games we tested, the Radeons' unusually poor performance...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-19, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • Obviously one concern when upgrading any off the shelf OEM PC is how much of a liability the included power supply is.  As we mentioned earlier in the article, the PSUs on these three systems ranged from 250 watts to 350 watts, which is rather small for m...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-18, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Last week, AMD made two announcements. First, it was dropping the price of its Radeon R7 260X to $120, effective immediately. Second, it previewed the Radeon R7 265 at $150. Today, the 260X remains a mostly-$140 card. And the 265 isn't expected for a coup...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 26 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 26   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×