us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SATA » Western Digital 3.5 inch VelociRaptor SATA600 WD-DHTZ Series



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Western Digital 3.5 inch VelociRaptor SATA600 WD-DHTZ Series

Testseek.com have collected 81 expert reviews of the Western Digital 3.5 inch VelociRaptor SATA600 WD-DHTZ Series and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Western Digital 3.5 inch VelociRaptor SATA600 WD-DHTZ Series.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2012
June 2012
 
(83%)
81 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
83 0 100 81

The editors liked

  • Outstanding sequential read and write speeds
  • Best IOPS weve seen out of a spinning disk to date (nonhybrid)
  • Industry leading 5Year Warranty
  • Sequential transfer speeds measuring 206MB/s read and write
  • Improved random access over 600GB VelociRaptor
  • Excellent thermal dissipation and lower power consumption
  • Larger capacity options then previous VelociRaptor generations
  • 64MB Cache
  • 5-year warranty
  • 10
  • 000RPM Spindle Speed
  • Higher performance over currently available HDD drives
  • Fastest HD Yet
  • Nearly Double The Capacity Of Previous VelociRaptor
  • SATA 6G Support
  • 5-Year Warranty
  • Speedy for a hard drive. Inexpensive compared with SSDs.
  • The WD VelociRaptor WD1000DHTZ offers great performance and offers 1TB of storage space
  • Good sequential read and write
  • Good seek performance
  • 1 TB of storage
  • 5 year warranty
  • Middle‑ground between SSD speed and HDD capacity/reliability
  • Quick randomaccess times and fast raw reads and writes.

The editors didn't like

  • HDDs generally struggle to match the thousands of IOPS capable of modern SSDs. As good as it is
  • The VR just can't come close to Solid State.
  • Fell behind in our HTPC trace
  • Small capacity compared to other HDD (4TB drives currently available)
  • Low performance when compared to SSD
  • High cost per gigabyte
  • Alidan Aug 2
  • 2012
  • 1
  • 28 PM
  • High Cost Per GB Versus 7200RPM Hard Drives
  • SSDs More Affordable Then Ever
  • Slower than SSDs. Pricier than traditional spinning hard drives
  • The new WD VelociRaptor WD1000DHTZ is noticeably more expensive than regular hard drives of the same capacity
  • Expensive
  • High price per GB ratio
  • Awkward middle‑ground between SSD high price and HDD slow speeds.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-07-12, Author: Achim , review by: tomshw.it

  • Quasi esattamente due anni dopo l'introduzione del WD6000HLHX da 600 GB, l'azienda riafferma il suo dominio nel mondo degli hard disk da 3,5" più veloci con il VelociRaptor WD1000DHTZ.I dischi battono quasi sempre le soluzioni concorrenti, mentre i bassi ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-21, review by: pc-experience.de

  • exzellente Verarbeitung und Haptik, gute bis sehr gute sequentielle Transferleistungen, sehr gute Zugriffszeiten, Einsatz in Raid-Arrays problemlos möglich, 24/7 Betrieb ausdrücklich unterstützt, relativ gute thermische Eigenschaften durch IcePack Rahmen
  • laute Zugriffsgeräusche
  • Totgesagte leben bekanntlich länger, das trifft nicht nur auf Karl Ranseier zu, sondern gilt gleichermaßen für die ferro-magnetischen Datenträger, um so mehr für die Western Digital VelociRaptor WD1000DHTZ Festplatte, die auf Grund ihrer Transferleistunge...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-05-18, review by: tomshw.de

  • Abstract:  Der Nachfolger der schnellsten 3,5-Zoll-Festplatte ist im Testlabor eingetroffen und hängt die Performance-Messlatte zum Leidwesen der Konkurrenz noch einmal deutlich höher. Mit seiner Festplatten-Serie Raptor hat Western Digital IT-Geschichte geschrie...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-24, review by: Chip.de

  • Extrem hohe Transferraten, Sehr niedrige Reaktionszeit (Lesen), Bleibt sehr kühl, Niedriger Stromverbrauch
  • Laut beim wahlfreien Zugriff
  • Die ziemlich teure Western Digital VelociRaptor (WD1000DHTZ) hat sich im Test bis an die Spitze der Bestenliste der internen 3,5-Zoll-Festplatten durchgebissen: Extrem hohe Transferraten und kurze Zugriffszeiten bei gleichzeitig sehr niedrigen Betriebstem...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(89%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-16, Author: Carsten , review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Nach allem, was Sie bisher gelesen haben, können Sie es sich sicherlich schon denken: Western Digital kann mit der neuen WD100DHTZ den Vorgänger aus eigenem Hause insgesamt entthronen und somit bleibt die Velcoriraptor-Reihe weiterhin die Festplatte der W...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-16, review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Nach allem, was Sie bisher gelesen haben, können Sie es sich sicherlich schon denken: Western Digital kann mit der neuen WD100DHTZ den Vorgänger aus eigenem Hause insgesamt entthronen und somit bleibt die Velcoriraptor-Reihe weiterhin die Festplatte der W...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-18, review by: hardware.info

  • We hebben aardig wat benchmarks voorbij zien komen, maar zoals gebruikelijk is PCMark 7 de beste leidraad om een conclusie voor praktijksituaties te bepalen. We zien dat de Velociraptor 1 TB gemiddeld zo'n 50% sneller is dan normale 1 TB harde schijven...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-16, Author: Jaap , review by: pcmweb.nl

  • Vlot, Degelijk, Hoge capaciteit
  • Zoektijd i.v.m ssd, Prijzig!

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-25, review by: ixbt.com

  • Abstract:  Первая попытка создания гибридных винчестеров производителями была предпринята еще во времена Windows Vista, но осталась практически не замеченной рынком. Во многом попытка не удалась как раз потому, что эта система так и не стала популярной, а флэш-памят...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-10, review by: ixbt.com

  • Начнем с семейств Blue и Black — как видим, их можно считать одним и тем же. Разве что сроки гарантии на представителей второго выше, но это не относится к техническим характеристиками. А они сильно подровнялись — даже преимущество в емкости кэш-памяти ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×