Testseek.com have collected 109 expert reviews of the Crucial / Micron M.2 P1 Series NVMe PCIe and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Crucial / Micron M.2 P1 Series NVMe PCIe.
May 2019
(80%)
109 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
800100109
The editors liked
Great Performance
Small Form Factor
Super Fast NVMe
Available in Sizes up to 1TB
More Storage Less Cost
Included Imaging Software
Good performance
Over 3 GB/s read speeds
High write speeds (into pSLC cache)
Competitively priced
5-year warranty
Compact form factor
Crucial disk cloning software included
Much Faster Than SATA SSD
Free Acronis True Image Software
Up To 2TB Capacity
Attractive Price
Five-Years Warranty
High performance (especially in random operations)
Inexpensive
Cloning software included
Available in 500GB
1TB and 2TB capacities
PCIe 3.0 x4 interface with NVMe protocol
Silicon Motion SM2263EN controller
Equipped with Micron 3D QLC NAND
Good sequential and random read and write performance
Small M.2 2280 form factor
Large DRAM cache
Very Good Overall Performance
Endurance Numbers (200TBW / 1.5 Million Hours MTTF)
Crucial Storage Executive Software
5 Years Limited Warranty
Available In 2TB
Price (For Some)
Sequential read and write performance
File copy performance
Good power efficiency
Black PCB
Good cost-per-gigabyte ratio for a PCI Express M.2 drive
Polished software management suite
Market-leading cost per gigabyte
Very good performance until cache runs out
Aggressive Pricing
Low Latency
Competitive 4K QD1 Transfers
5 Year Warranty
Good overall performance
Single-sided
Does not overheat
Price
5 year warranty
The editors didn't like
Sammy still faster
Kinda
Starts thermal throttling quickly
When heavily loaded
Very low write speeds when pSLC cache exhausted
Thermal reporting inaccurate
Low Write Speeds
Lacking Hardware Encryption
Crucial's SSDs have always been competitively priced compared to the competition and the P1 is no exception. At $220
The P1 1TB costs about $60 less than the 970 EVO 1TB which retails for $280. Sure
The 97
Nothing worth to mention
Write speed drops when SLC cache is full
Does not support hardware based encryption
Thermal Throttling (Although Not Very Evident In Our Review)
SLC Cache Algorithms (Performance Largely Dependant On Free Space)
Lower than average application performance
Low endurance
Ho-hum sequential-write benchmark speeds at tested size
Low endurance rating
Though competitive warranty length
No heat spreader
Sustained write speed plummets after secondary cache is exhausted
500MB version writes half as fast as the 1TB
Middling Sequential Transfers
Relatively Low Endurance Rating
Dramatic drop in write performance with sustained writes
Abstract: После многомесячного падения цен настал отличный момент для модернизации дисковой подсистемы и перехода на новые модели SSD с повышенной ёмкостью и прогрессивным интерфейсом NVMe. Мы провели практическое сравнение представленных на рынке вариантов и готовы дать конкретный ответ на вопрос, что нужно и что не нужно покупать...
Комментировать ( )Если Вы заметили ошибку — выделите ее мышью и нажмите CTRL+ENTER.Материалы по темеОбзор SATA SSD-накопителей WD Blue 3D NAND и SanDisk Ultra 3D: «3D» – вездеОбзор NVMe-накопителя Intel SSD 760p: вот давно бы так!Обзор SATA SSD-накопителя...
Com uma performance de alta qualidade, o SSD Crucial da P1 é um dispositivo que vale a pena ser adquirido pelos usuários que procuram por um SSD compacto e com bom desempenho. Além disso, seu preço reduzido em relação aos principais concorrentes é outro p...
Bons tempos de leitura e escrita, Preço competitivo para o perfil de produto
Não tem como analisar um SSD da linha Crucial P1 e não comparar com a linha Intel Serie 660p. Afinal, ambos os modelos tem características muitos semelhantes, como mesmo controlador e memórias, essas últimas com pequenas diferenças na leitura/escrita, mas...
Em nossos testes, o Crucial P1 de 1.000 GiB apresentou um discreto ganho de desempenho de leitura e escrita ao trabalhar com dados compactáveis. Se lembrarmos do teste do Intel 660p, naquele SSD o desempenho foi ligeiramente mais baixo no modo "zero fill"...
Abstract: Sam szybki procesor nie czyni jeszcze szybkiego komputera – wysokie tempo pracy jest bowiem efektem wszystkich zastosowanych rozwiązań hardware'owych, a ich istotnym elementem obok porządnego procesora i wystarczającej pamięci operacyjnej jest właśnie szy...
świetny stosunek wydajności do ceny, cena niewiele wyższa od dobrych nośników SATA III, wydajny kontroler NVMe, działa bezproblemowo z wbudowanym w system sterownikiem
wydajność spada przy długotrwałym obciążeniu, niska wartość parametru TBW
Wszystkie nośniki Cruciala pakowane są niemal identycznie.Nim przejdziemy do oceny całego urządzenia, sprawdzimy jak zwykle średnią wydajność we wszystkich testachPo uwzględnieniu testów syntetycznych okazuje się, że udało się pokonać dwa nośniki korzyst...
Published: 2019-01-22, Author: Sebastian , review by: purepc.pl
Wysoki zapis i odczyt sekwencyjny, Bardzo dobre wyniki próbek 4K i 4K64T, Bardzo szybko kopiuje małe i srednie pliki, Brak jakiegokolwiek okablowania, Pięcioletnia gwarancja producenta
obarczona jednak limitem 300 TBW, Spadek wydajności po zapełnieniu TurboWrite, Bardzo wysokie temperatury pod obciążeniem, Przy zapełnieniu w 80% zapis zwalnia, Spadek wydajności po zapełnieniu TurboW
