Testseek.com have collected 129 expert reviews of the OCZ 2.5 inch Trion 100 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 77%. Scroll down and see all reviews for OCZ 2.5 inch Trion 100 Series SATA600.
October 2015
(77%)
129 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(82%)
57 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
770100129
The editors liked
Market leading warranty program
Inexpensive
Excellent real-world performance for the 960GB capacity
Good sequential and random read performance
Impressive endurance rating given use of planar TLC flash
ShieldPlus Warranty offers free advance RMA
Price
Build Quality (Toshiba A19nm NAND)
Read Performance Levels
OCZ ShieldPlus 3-Year Warranty
SSD Guru Software
Durability (1.5 Million Hours MTBF / 120TBW)
Available in 120GB
240GB
480GB and 960GB capacities
Good sequential read and write speeds under most conditions
Performs equally well with compressible and incompressible data
SATA 6Gb/s interface
Supports TRIM and idle background garbage collection
Endurance
Notebook battery life
Performance compared to HDDs
Inexpensive—especially at lower capacities
Very impressive sequential speeds for a budget drive
Impressive endurance ratings at high capacities
The OCZ Trion 100 series solid-state drive is much faster than any regular hard drive and is affordable. The SSD also has high endurance
Allowing you to write a lot of data to it before it becomes unreliable
Strong Reads
3 Year Warranty
OCZ Guru Utility
Good pricepergigabyte ratio
3 year warranty
ShieldPlus warranty program
SSD Guru software
DEVSLP support
Excellent price per GB
Good read performance
Good MySQL Enterprise performance
7 mm thin—ultrabook compatible
Great read performance
3-year ShieldPlus warranty
High endurance rating
Nice aspect
Performance
OCZ Guru software
Power consumption
Bang for the Buck Low price per GB
Faster than HDD
Decent endurance
Low price per GB
Decent endurance.
The editors didn't like
Poor overall synthetic performance
Smaller capacities also had a very weak showing during our real-world tests
SLC write cache capacity is deficient compared to competing SSDs
Sustained write speeds are severely crippled compared with competing SSDs
(and some HDDs)
Mixed mode (read + write) IOPS performance is limited and inconsistent
Warranty period shorter t
Write Performance Levels
Bundle
Mediocre random write performance
Write speed drops when SLC cache is full
Does not support hardware based encryption
Price
SLC density in relation to the overall capacity
Performance
Disappointing random write speeds
SanDisk Ultra II performs better overall and is slightly more affordable at some capacities
No in-box accessories or software
Compared with other solid-state drives (not traditional hard drives) on the market the new Trion is among the slowest. The drive also comes with a short three-year warranty and doesn't support encryption
