us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SSD » Samsung 2.5 inch 860 Evo Series SATA600



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung 2.5 inch 860 Evo Series SATA600

Testseek.com have collected 144 expert reviews of the Samsung 2.5 inch 860 Evo Series SATA600 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung 2.5 inch 860 Evo Series SATA600.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2018
January 2018
 
(88%)
144 Reviews
Users
(97%)
12807 Reviews
88 0 100 144

The editors liked

  • Outstanding endurance rating
  • Good overall performance
  • Strong Performance
  • Exceptional Software Package With DRAM Cache and Cloning
  • ClassLeading Endurance
  • Name Recognition and Reliability
  • Excellent performance on a par with MLC drives
  • Very affordable
  • Very fast with small queued writes
  • Good Endurance Rating
  • 5 Year Warranty
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Impressive 565/537 MBps read/write speed with ATTO
  • Random 4K read/writes produced 95
  • 016 IOPS
  • Samsung MJX controller supports TRIM and NCQ
  • Samsung 64-cell layer V-NAND doubles TBW durability
  • TCG/Opal 2.0 security automatic 256-bit AES hardware encryp
  • Impressive 565/538 MBps read/write speed with ATTO
  • Random 4K read/writes produced 94
  • 500 IOPS
  • Excellent performance
  • Reliable brand recognition and support
  • Great price point
  • Fantastic Performance
  • Up To 4TB Capacity
  • Higher Write Endurance Than Competition
  • Samsung Magician Software
  • Hardware-Based Encryption
  • Five-Years Warranty

The editors didn't like

  • Slower write speeds
  •  
  • Mixed workload performance lagged behind the 850 Series
  • TRIM-related performance issues (significantly behind 850 Series)
  • Lower Than Expected Native TLC Performance
  • The SATA Performance Ceiling
  • Less long-lived than the MLC (2-bit) SSDs
  • SATA Is Old Hat
  • NVMe M.2 Drives Not Much More Expensive
  • Small 512MB DRAM cache buffer (on 250/500GB models)
  • 3-Bit MLC NAND offers less impressive sequential performance
  • Limitations with SATA
  • Performance
  • The Samsung 860 EVO 1TB performs really well when it comes to read writes speeds
  • Which it can average between 550MB/s to 560MB/s and a write performance of 520MB/s—which
  • Needless to say
  • Is a lot faster than the hybri
  • Expensive
  • The biggest downside of the 860 Evo 500GB is its high pricetag which will definitely push some people away because there are cheaper alternatives out there that perform just as good as the 860 Evo. Its steep pricing makes it difficult to recom

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 14 of 15
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-03-08, Author: 萧剑一生 , review by: pconline.com.cn

  • 三星今年初升级了主流消费级的860系列硬盘,闪存升级到了新一代64层堆栈V-NAND闪存,主控升级到了MJX,缓存也升级到了LPDDR4,这三点上可谓焕然一新,带给860 Pro及860 Evo系列更强的性能,同时可靠性进一步提升,TBW寿命相比前代都有了大幅提升,大容量版SSD尤其明显。除了针对桌面玩家SATA接口产品之外,860 Evo系列还有M.2规格的产品,其性能相比SATA版几乎没什么区别,读写速度超过了500MB/s。以往大家对三星SSD硬盘的印象是可以归结为两点——东西很不错,但是价格较贵,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-07, Author: 赵华铭 , review by: it168.com

  • 评测总结:860 EVO在闪存颗粒上用的是V-NAND的第四代3D TLC NAND,堆栈层数来到64层,写入寿命可以达到1200TBW,也就是600次全盘写入,不过相比同容量的860 PRO来说还是弱了一些。性能方面,550MB/s、510MB/s左右的顺序读写,40MB/s、130 MB/s左右的4K随机读写速度和860 PRO差距不大,毕竟两者走的都是6Gb/s的SATA通道。得益于第四代V-NAND技术以及TLC闪存颗粒的使用,860 EVO在每GB价格上得以进一步降低,换句话说就是可以用更少的钱...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-07, Author: 萧剑一生 , review by: mydrivers.com

  • :860 EVO 4TB版由于极高的门槛,非土豪玩家是没法选择的。这次测试的是860 EVO的1TB版,身价比4TB版低多了,二者的性能几乎一致,官方标称的读写速度都在550、520MB/s左右,随机性能也达到了90K以上,实测与之接近,可以说860 EVO 1TB版硬盘是目前市面上SATA 6Gbpx接口中的高性能SSD硬盘。与4TB版高不可攀的售价相比,860 EVO 1TB版售价为2399元,这个价格比目前的850 EVO 1TB还要便宜100块钱,后者在京东上依然要2499元。但是现在花更少的钱,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-06, Author: 萧剑一生 , review by: pconline.com.cn

  • 1TB版的三星860 Evo硬盘性能跟之前测试的4TB版几行一致,实测连续读写在530MB/s、500MB/s左右,在SATA 6Gbps硬盘中已经是靠前水平了,目前限制SATA硬盘的主要就是接口了,所以对消费者来说也不要太纠结SATA接口硬盘的性能指标了,主要看的还是产品的品牌、售价、可靠性及质保等问题,在这点上三星的硬盘更有优势。PConline评测室总结之前测试的4TB版由于极高的门槛,非土豪玩家是没法选择的,这次测试的是860 Evo的1TB版,身价比4TB版低多了,二者的性能几乎一致,官方标称的...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-02, Author: 萧剑一生 , review by: pconline.com.cn

  • 测试结果如之前所说,连续读写速度已经没什么惊喜了,SATA 6Gbps接口下也不要强求什么了,读取速度可达530-560M/s,写入速度500-530MB/s,随机性能表现不错,4K QD16下读取、写入还是有97K、87K IOPS,总之性能是符合官方标称参数的,在一众SATA 6Gbps接口的SSD硬盘中也是拔尖的。PConline评测室总结先不说别的,即便作为一款普通SSD硬盘来看,三星860 Evo 4TB硬盘各方面指标都不弱,性能够强,连续、随机性能在SATA硬盘中都是靠前的,毕竟SATA 6G...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-02-02, review by: sina.com.cn

  • SSD硬盘一度杀价到480GB只要799元的地步,但是因为NAND闪存大涨价,而且持续了一年半时间了,所以市面上最畅销的SSD硬盘容量又停留在了120256GB容量的都没普及。TB级别SSD硬盘何时进入普通玩家的电脑中?这个问题没谁能给出准确预测,不过消费级SSD进一步提升容量是必然的了,目前桌面级硬盘最多也就1-2TB容量,三星前不久正式推出了860 PromSATA空间太小,塞不下这么多闪存,我们这次测试的860 Evo 4TB版。由于SATA 6Gbps接口所限,860 Evo 4TB硬盘的连续读写...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-05-17, Author: yacamochi , review by: chimolog.co

  • トップクラスの性能, SATA SSDでは最高の耐久性, 安定性が非常に高い, 製品保証はたっぷり5年間, コストパフォーマンスも優秀
  • SATA SSDでは最高の温度
  • サムスンが惜しげなくハイエンドコンポーネントで固めたコンシューマ向けSSD「Samsung 860 EVO」は、スペックから期待される通りの凄まじいパフォーマンスを発揮してみせた。主な競合は「Crucial MX500」と「WD Blue 3D SSD(=SanDisk Ultra 3D)」ですが価格はだいたい横並びなので、どうせ選ぶならSamsung 860 EVOで間違いないですね。「Samsung 860 EVO」の良いところトップクラスの性能SATA SSDでは最高の耐久性安定性が非常に高い製品保...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-07-28, Author: yacamochi , review by: chimolog.co

  • 優れた耐久性能, 高速なDRAMキャッシュ, 完全自社製のSSD, 競争力のある価格設定, 5年保証, TLC NANDを採用するSATA SSDとして「ほぼ最高の性能」, 同価格帯のSSDを50~100%も上回る「耐久性」, 5年保証, 安定している動作温度
  • 日常的に大容量データを書き込むなら上位版の「860 PRO」をどうぞ
  • ぼくはSSDに関してはサムスン愛好家で、やっぱり主要パーツがすべて自社製という安心感が信頼につながっています。実際のパフォーマンスもここまで見てきたとおり、SATA SSDとしてほぼ最高性能です。SSD860 EVOMX500Micron 1100SL500読み込み(Seq)564.1 MB/s562.7 MB/s534.4 MB/s516.7 MB/s書き込み(Seq)535.9 MB/s511.0 MB/s520.7 MB/s464.1 MB/s読み込み(4KB Q=32)408.3 MB/s404...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-01-24, Author: 米田 , review by: 4gamer.net

  • もっとも,グラフ10の総合スコアはほとんど横並びで,スコアから何かを語るのは難しい。一方,有意な違いが見られるのがストレージの平均帯域幅だ。860 PROは850 PROに対して約10MB/s,パーセンテージにして約3%上がっており,まずまずの向上が見られると言っていい。気になるのは,860 EVOが最低スコアを示しているところだ。しかも誤差レベルではなく,850 EVO比で約95%と,明らかに低いが,なぜこういう結果になっているのかは,正直なところ分からない。大きなインパクトはないものの,性能面の安定性...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-12-04, review by: coolenjoy.net

  • Abstract:  전문가 리뷰...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 14 of 15 « Previous   1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×