us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Notebooks » Razer Blade 14 R3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Razer Blade 14 R3

Testseek.com have collected 92 expert reviews of the Razer Blade 14 R3 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Razer Blade 14 R3.
Award: Good Buy January 2014
January 2014
 
(79%)
92 Reviews
Users
(77%)
238 Reviews
79 0 100 92

The editors liked

  • This is very close to a perfect body for a gaming laptop. The Blade is gorgeous and well built. There is zero flex anywhere. It runs current games on high graphics settings at good-to-acceptable framerates. The trackpad is more responsive than the majorit
  • Desktop-grade performance in a tiny clamshell frame
  • Good battery life
  • Slick design
  • Gorgeous 3K display...
  • It's the Blade I've been waiting for Razer to make
  • 14-inches
  • Best-in-class graphics and a 1080p display
  • Advertisement
  • Still has one of the best Windows trackpads I've ever used. Its touch gestures work so well that I almost never even u
  • Solid quality and design
  • Good keyboard and touchpad
  • Great gaming performance
  • The Razer Blade 14 has a slim design with a powerful combination of fourth-gen quad-core Intel processor and Nvidia graphics
  • Battery life is strong
  • Too
  • Slim
  • Ultraportable design. New Nvidia GeForce GTX 870M graphics card. Upgraded graphics. Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide (IGZO) display with 3
  • 200-by-1
  • 800 resolution and touch capability.
  • 3
  • 200x1
  • 800 touch screen impressive
  • At least on paper
  • Good looks
  • Sturdy construction
  • Sexy
  • Lightweight chassis
  • Extremely portable
  • Excellent graphics and performance
  • Comfortable
  • Fully programmable keyboard
  • Long battery life
  • The new Razer Blade boasts the same beautifully thin design
  • But adds a sharp 3
  • 800 touch display and advanced Nvidia graphics
  • Portable
  • Sexy design
  • Stunning
  • 3200 x 1800 display
  • Excellent overall and graphic performance
  • Comfortable keyboard
  • Sleek
  • Light design. Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide (IGZO) display with 3
  • 800 resolution and touch capability. Intel Core i7-4720HQ CPU and 16GB memory. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M GPU. Improved performance and battery life over previous iteration.
  • Beautiful design
  • Useful
  • Customizable gaming trackpad
  • Large screen.
  • Still the best way to get gaming to go. Responsive touchscreen and touchpad. Impressive speaker quality. Upped resolution now supports 3200 x 1800 pixels
  • Great design
  • Sharp
  • High-resolution display
  • Good touchpad performance
  • Thin
  • Light
  • And strong
  • Games like a champ
  • 6+ hour battery life
  • Go Back to Top. Skip To
  • Start of Article
  • Blade
  • Gaming laptops
  • Haswell
  • Laptops
  • Razer
  • Fast and powerful
  • Excellent trackpad
  • Stellar battery life (for a gaming machine)
  • Compact and thoroughly attractive
  • Almost perfect combination of performance and mobility
  • High build quality
  • Good battery runtimes
  • Low weight
  • Thin chassis
  • Great 3
  • 200 x 1
  • 800 display
  • Compact and attractive

The editors didn't like

  • The mostly awesome trackpad is almost completely submarined by its idiotic buttons. Battery life is hugely improved from your standard gaming rig
  • But you're getting nowhere near the six hours claimed by Razer. The screen is sub-optimal
  • On color performa
  • But you'll never need 3K resolution
  • Expensive
  • Shorter battery life than last year's model. That's never good
  • The 1080p model only comes in a single configuration. What if I want more storage space than 256GB?
  • Advertisement
  • I wish I could disable the backlighting on the lid's Razer l
  • Not user upgradeable
  • Limited port selection
  • A lackluster low-resolution
  • Nontouch display doesn't fit the high-end design. The baseline 128GB SSD for $1
  • 800 isn't sufficient for a gaming PC
  • You'd better pony up for the 256GB or 512GB model
  • Runs very hot. High-resolution display may actually hamper performance. Shorter battery life than previous model reduces portability
  • Graphics performance comes up short
  • Runs hot and loud
  • Not inexpensive
  • Runs hot while gaming
  • Limited viewing angles
  • Lacks SD card slot
  • The battery life is worse than last year's model's. Adding more SSD storage can turn this into a pricey laptop
  • Runs incredibly hot
  • Below-average battery life
  • Gets very hot. Discrepancy between graphics and display capability
  • Price tag suggests beefier components.
  • Dimmer screen is a letdown
  • As is the price hike. What
  • No page up/page down keys? One key's backlight died during testing
  • Poor battery life
  • No SD card slot
  • Some games don't work at full resolution
  • Sub-par screen
  • Burning hot while gaming
  • Touchpad can be finnicky
  • A bit slow to boot. Pricey. No touchscreen. Still no SD card reader
  • Middling screen and audio quality
  • More expensive (and less powerful) than other machines
  • Only available in the US and Canada
  • Very bad display
  • Screen resolution can undercut performance
  • Shorter battery life than the 2013 model

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-03-03, Author: Sean , review by: gizmodo.com

  • It's the Blade I've been waiting for Razer to make: 14-inches, best-in-class graphics and a 1080p display, Advertisement, Advertisement, Still has one of the best Windows trackpads I've ever used. Its touch gestures work so well that I almost never even u
  • Shorter battery life than last year's model. That's never good, The 1080p model only comes in a single configuration. What if I want more storage space than 256GB?, Advertisement, Advertisement, I wish I could disable the backlighting on the lid's Razer l
  • Do you want a gaming laptop? Do you care about how small it is or how sleek and professional it looks? If your answers are "yes" and "no," look elsewhere; you can get more bang for your buck with a thicker, less premium machine. If you need a laptop that...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-18, Author: Brett , review by: anandtech.com

  • For 2015, we have a new Razer Blade, which on the outside is a dead ringer for last year's model. We have the same design, the same keyboard, trackpad, strong aluminum body, and fantastic QHD+ display. All of those features were already excellent on the p...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-10, Author: Brian , review by: pcmag.com

  • Sleek, light design. Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide (IGZO) display with 3,200-by-1,800 resolution and touch capability. Intel Core i7-4720HQ CPU and 16GB memory. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M GPU. Improved performance and battery life over previous iteration.
  • Gets very hot. Discrepancy between graphics and display capability
  • The newest Razer Blade boasts impressive features and great performance, making it the ultraportable gaming machine to beat....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-12-29, Author: Housen , review by: computershopper.com

  • 3,200x1,800 touch screen impressive, at least on paper, Good looks, Sturdy construction
  • Graphics performance comes up short, Runs hot and loud, Not inexpensive
  • Though it's nice to see that Razer was listening to criticism of last year's Razer Blade for not having full HD resolution, the 3,200x1,800 display of this year's update feels like overcompensating, since it's hard to get playable frame rates at such sky...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-10-17, Author: Brett , review by: anandtech.com

  • The 2013 Razer Blade was a fantastic notebook computer with an abysmal display. For 2014, Razer has put one of the best displays we have ever tested in a laptop into the Blade, and it truly completes the experience. Razer's slogan is “For Gamers, by Gamer...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-25, Author: Karim , review by: gamecrate.com

  • Abstract:  Continuing their line of ultra-performance laptops, Razer promises to satisfy the high expectations of desktop gamers with their newest offering, the Razer Blade. Commanding a steep price point of $2,400, the Razer Blade comes with a slew of high-performa...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2014-08-29, Author: Sherri , review by: Laptopmag.com

  • Portable, sexy design, Stunning, 3200 x 1800 display, Excellent overall and graphic performance, Comfortable keyboard
  • Expensive, Runs incredibly hot, Below-average battery life
  • The Razer Blade 14 is comfortably seated at the intersection of portability and power, offering excellent graphics and gaming performance with an ultra-high-res display in a slim, lightweight chassis....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-07-28, Author: Brian , review by: pcmag.com

  • Slim, ultraportable design. New Nvidia GeForce GTX 870M graphics card. Upgraded graphics. Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide (IGZO) display with 3,200-by-1,800 resolution and touch capability.
  • Runs very hot. High-resolution display may actually hamper performance. Shorter battery life than previous model reduces portability
  • The newest Razer Blade ultraportable gaming laptop has a lot to love, but a higher price and some performance issues leave us recommending last year's model instead....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-24, Author: Christopher , review by: wired.com

  • Still the best way to get gaming to go. Responsive touchscreen and touchpad. Impressive speaker quality. Upped resolution now supports 3200 x 1800 pixels
  • Dimmer screen is a letdown, as is the price hike. What, no page up/page down keys? One key's backlight died during testing

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-07, Author: James , review by: mashable.com

  • Desktop-grade performance in a tiny clamshell frame, Good battery life, Slick design, Gorgeous 3K display...
  • but you'll never need 3K resolution, Expensive

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 1 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×