us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Software » Symantec Norton Internet Security 2010



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Symantec Norton Internet Security 2010

Testseek.com have collected 38 expert reviews of the Symantec Norton Internet Security 2010 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Symantec Norton Internet Security 2010.
Award: Highest Rated October 2009
October 2009
 
(87%)
38 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
87 0 100 38

The editors liked

  • Easy
  • Intelligent install. New access to "insight" data. Accurate antispam capabilities. Complete parental controls. Best anti-malware component yet. Low performance impact. Well rounded firewall. Accurate antiphishing protection. Password management main...
  • Effective at blocking new threats
  • Minimal system slowdowns
  • Norton Insight reduces length of future system scans by validating trustworthy files the first time.

The editors didn't like

  • Network map doesnt allow remote configuration or repair.
  • Interface is dark
  • Hard to read
  • It couldn't effectively block the contaminated archive that we installed.

 

Reviews

page 2 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-12-21, review by: gadgetguy.com.au

  • Low CPU usage; Excellent anti-spam; Sophisticated parental lock
  • Relatively expensive; Protection lasts only 12 months; Options can be overwhelming

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-12-07, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • More features than ever to keep you safe online, Norton Internet Security 2010 is a slam dunk in a pleasingly nimble package. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2009-10-01, review by: impulsegamer.com

  • Abstract:  Moving on from their positive launch of Norton Internet Security 2009, Symantec continue to be THE leader in the field when it comes to true holistic protection of your PC. With glowing reviews and positive feedback from the broader community with Nort...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(94%)
 
  Published: 2009-09-26, review by: Zdnet.com.au

  • Surprisingly lightly CPU usage, Bolsters last year's reputationbased detection engine with a new behaviouraldetection system
  • Still a fairly hefty CPU footprint, New efficacy results show that while it continues to be in the top five apps at detecting malicious software, it still doesn't have the highest rate of detection
  • Norton Internet Security 2010 builds on the immense progress it made in last year's version, maintaining a low system profile while strengthening its security framework. It's not perfect, but even Symantec's detractors should check it out. Edi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2009-09-25, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Surprisingly lightly CPU usage , Bolsters last year's reputation-based detection engine with a new behavioural-detection system
  • Still a fairly hefty CPU footprint , New efficacy results show that while it continues to be in the top five apps at detecting malicious software, it still doesn't have the highest rate of detection
  • Norton Internet Security 2010 builds on the immense progress it made in last year's version, maintaining a low system profile while strengthening its security framework. It's not perfect, but even Symantec's detractors should check it out....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2009-07-13, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Less bloated than earlier versions
  • Installation bugginess, uninstalls whatever security program is already running
  • So should you download this beta version of Norton Internet Security 2010? Given its installation bugginess — and the fact that it appears that the subscription may last only 14 days — the answer is most likely no. And since it uninstalls what...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: stuff.co.nz

  • Abstract:  Opinion poll Which security software do you use? A paid one like Norton or McAfee A free one like AVG I use a Mac so don't need any I use Linux so don't need any I use Windows, but don't need any Vote Result Twitter CEO pitches mobile credit Cellphon...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, Author: Preston , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Abstract:  Take a quick glance at the just-released Norton Internet Security 2010, and you won’t notice much of a difference from previous incarnations – the interface and feature set are so similar that it appears that only very minimal changes have been made t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-14, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • A powerful but unobtrusive internet security suite with excellent protection and plenty of features to make your online experience more secure. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-12-04, review by: techradar.com

  • Good scanning engine, Small footprint, Good use of user generated database
  • Not the cheapest option, No PC tuning

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 2 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×