Testseek.com have collected 200 expert reviews of the Fitbit Ionic and the average rating is 75%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fitbit Ionic.
September 2017
(75%)
200 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
750100200
The editors liked
Super bright screen
Top-notching fitness-tracking modes
Days and days of battery life
Really comfy on wrist
The Ionic will run for around four days on a charge (Fitbit claims a little longer). Either way
It's much better than other smartwatches
The Fitbit band connector is easy to use and allows quick band swaps
Logs exercise in the Fitbit app
Which is exce
Robust
Swim-proof design
Intuitive iOS app and watch menus
4+ day battery life
Integrated GPS
Comfortable design that sports a pretty thin profile
Stellar battery life that pushes well into a fourth day
Advanced sensors and software deftly track your movements
Gorgeous display
Sleek and light design
Solid fitness features
Comfortable fit
Water resistant
Support for GPS
Great battery life
Works very well as a fitness tracker
Loaded with features
Tons of options for clock faces
Good battery life
Excellent battery life
Great fitness tracking features
The Fitbit Ionic offers a comfortable design
With 50-meter water resistance for swimming
GPS and mobile payments. You only need to recharge it once or twice a week
Large screen
Good battery life for capabilities
Robust fitness and sleep tracking tools
Built-in GPS
Swim-proof
Inactivity reminders
Contact payment functionality
Guided breathing sessions
Vibrant screen
Changeable straps
Safe for swimming
Smart notifications
Built-in GPS and NFC
Pandora integration
Open SDK for app developers
Up to four-day battery life
Music storage
Quick and easy mobile payments
Accurate and insightful sleep analysis
Long battery life
Third-party apps
Intuitive UI
Interchangeable straps make it great for the office and gym
Touchscreen is easy to read outdoors
Great overall fitness tracker
Sleep tracking is detailed and helpful
2.5 GB of storage for music
5 ATM water resistance
Fitbit mobile app is intuitive a
Music Storage
Fitbit Pay
Interchangeable Bands
Good display
Bright display
Comprehensive fitness features
Swim tracking
Contactless payments work well
The editors didn't like
Half-baked smartwatch features
Managing music is a nightmare
Very big if you have small wrists
It does not look like a smartwatch that costs $300. Fit is a little strange because of the convex bottom
Small and rectangular with low resolution
Uses a nonstandard connector
And the stock band isn't very comfortable. The buckle also does not lay flat
Buggy sync process
Lack of apps
No workout audio cues
Music interfacing is flaky
Functionality as a smartwatch is severely limited
Nonexercise apps don't really do much
As pricey as an Apple Watch
Limited 3rd party support
Fitbit Pay not yet active in UK
Slow interface
Needs more third-party apps
Loading music is cumbersome
Notifications can't be interacted with
Photos by Raj Rout
Facebook Comments
ShareTweet
Offers underwhelming features compared to the original Ionic
While the Ionic supports future apps and watch faces
Few are available yet. Included apps feel slow and don't launch from the watch face. There's not much on-watch coaching and music storage and playback is often more trouble than it's worth
Per concludere la prova di Fitbit Ionic iniziamo dai lati positivi: innanzittutto la qualità costruttiva è interessante con un corpo solido ma leggero che non infastidisce quando è al polso sia durante l'attività fisica sia durante la normalità attività q...
Published: 2017-10-20, Author: Giovanni , review by: ridble.com
Desing particolare e affascinante, Schermo generoso e molto luminoso, Tracking GPS rapido e preciso, Applicazione mobile sempre perfetta, Autonomia valida
Software con qualche indecisione di troppo, Localizzazione in italiano incompleta, Raise to wakeup non sempre preciso, Setup iniziale un po' ostico
Alcuni sostengono che il Fitbit Ionic è il diretto concorrente dell'Apple Watch 3. Dal mio punto di vista, penso che i due prodotti siano indicati per due tipi di utenti molto diversi. Sebbene siano ovviamente presenti le classiche funzioni che fanno da c...
Fitbit Ionic: La Recensione – Smartwatch poco “smart” e molto fitness 16 ottobre 2017 Stefano Volponi 7 commenti Presentato ufficialmente lo scorso Agosto, introdotto in Europa durante IFA 2017 ed infine in Italia a Settembre, Fitbi...
Abstract: Dopo aver rimandato il lancio, a causa di vari problemi incontrati durante la progettazione, il produttore statunitense ha finalmente annunciato il suo primo smartwatch. Il Fitbit Ionic è un dispositivo indossabile completo che può essere indossato ogni g...
Abstract: Fitness-Armbänder sind nützliche Begleiter für den Sport: Die Tracker zeichnen den Fortschritt im Training auf und messen kontinuierlich die wichtigsten Vital-Werte. Die Auswahl der Modelle ist aber inzwischen groß und die Preise schwanken stark: Günstige Fitness-Armbänder bekommen Sie bereits für unter 30 Euro und für den Feierabend-Sport bieten diese ausreichend Funktionsumfang. Wer aber die volle Kontrolle über das Training haben will, zahlt für Premium-Modelle bis zu 300 Euro. Unser Testsieger, der Fitness-Tracker Garmin Vivoactive 4, gehört zur letzteren Kategorie: Das Top-Gerät kostet rund 270 Euro. Unser Preis-Leistungs-Tipp ist erheblich günstiger. Wir haben 39 Fitness-Tracker in unserem Testlabor getestet und die Testergebnisse zuletzt im November 2019 aktualisiert.
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2020-07-15, Author: Daniel , review by: Chip.de
Top-Ausstattung, Sehr hohe Genauigkeit, Super Ergonomie
Für einen Fitness-Tracker teuer, Armband recht kurz, Display ohne Helligkeitssensor
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2020-04-27, Author: Daniel , review by: Chip.de
Abstract: Fitness-Armbänder sind nützliche Begleiter für den Sport: Die Tracker zeichnen den Fortschritt im Training auf und messen kontinuierlich die wichtigsten Vital-Werte. Die Auswahl der Modelle ist aber inzwischen groß und die Preise schwanken stark: Günstige...
Published: 2018-09-20, Author: David , review by: techniknews.net
Zeit, um das ganze zusammenzufassen, beginnend beim Design, an dem ich überhaupt nichts auszusetzen habe. Die Uhr wurde gut verarbeitet, sieht gut aus, ist leicht und fühlt sich angenehm am Handgelenk an. Auch beim Display fand ich keine Nachteile. Es kan...
Published: 2018-09-09, Author: Benjamin , review by: netzwelt.de
Lange Akkulaufzeit, Wasserdicht, GPS, Tolle Smartphone-App, Schlanke Bauweise, Lange Akkulaufzeit, Kurze Eingewöhnungsphase, Fitbit-Community
Hoher Preis, Wenig Apps verfügbar, Display/Gehäuse-Verhältnis, Kein GPS-Empfänger, Musikwiedergabe fast unbrauchbar, Nur mit Smartphone zuverlässig
So ähnlich die Fitness-Uhren aus dem Familienkreis der Fitbits auf den ersten Blick sind, so unterschiedlich sind sie im Detail. Wo die Fitbit Ionic mit Präzision und Unabhängigkeit glänzen kann, ist die Versa schlank und für viele Nutzer optisch ansprech...
Published: 2018-09-08, Author: David , review by: techniknews.net
Abstract: Seit knapp einem Jahr kann man die Fitbit Ionic kaufen, allerdings bekam ich erst jetzt ein Testgerät. Ich packte die Uhr aus und verschaffte mir einen ersten Eindruck. Zum Abschnitt springen [ verstecken ] Die Box, in der sich die Ionic und das ganze Zub...
