us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Home Electronics » Wearables » LG G Watch



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of LG G Watch

Testseek.com have collected 233 expert reviews of the LG G Watch and the average rating is 65%. Scroll down and see all reviews for LG G Watch.
 
(65%)
233 Reviews
Users
(90%)
90 Reviews
65 0 100 233

The editors liked

  • Shows all your phone's notifications on your wrist
  • Always on display
  • Easy to customize watch face and watch bands
  • Decent battery life
  • Smart Google Now functionality. Larger text than Gear Live. Works with standard watchbands.
  • Always-on displa
  • Comfortabl
  • Slick interfac
  • Good use of voice actions
  • Easy to attach wristband
  • Convenient charging cradle
  • It runs Android Wear
  • The G Watch shows off Android Wear's impressive voice recognition
  • Android phone connectedness
  • And potential for future app support. It has solid build quality
  • Is water- and dust-resistant
  • And the included magnetic charger is easy to use
  • Having Google Now on your wrist is truly useful and convenient. Charging cradle is easy to use. Tracks steps
  • Always on Google Now access
  • Material design gives the platform a flowy look & feel
  • Screen is usable outdoors
  • Design is simplistic
  • Minimal
  • Easy to customize with different watch bands
  • Fast charging time
  • Android Wear handles plenty very well already including notification cards and voice commands
  • Wear should grow quite well

The editors didn't like

  • Doesn't do anything your phone can't already do
  • Screen tough to read outdoors
  • More expensive and fewer features than the Gear Live. Short battery life. No physical buttons. Android Wear lacks a Back button. Few apps available. Bulky
  • No heart rate monito
  • Android Wear a work in progres
  • Lots of swiping required
  • More expensive than slightly better competition
  • Impossible to read in sunlight
  • Extremely boring industrial design
  • Poor battery life
  • A generic-looking design
  • Terrible battery life
  • A display that doesn't work in bright sunlight
  • A strange card-based notification system that doesn't always pop info you want
  • Costs more
  • Lacks the heart-rate monitor
  • And has a slightly weaker display th
  • The hardware is bulky and uncomfortable. Features are limited—for now. Notifications are often delivered with a significant (5minuteplus) delay. Battery lasts barely a day. The constant vibrating of new notifications is really just the worst thing ever
  • Boring design makes it unappealing looking
  • Screen has a bland look to it
  • It's more expensive than Samsung's offering
  • Battery delivers a day of usage at the most
  • Design might be too minimal for some
  • No buttons
  • Only touch inputs
  • Difficult to get battery to last more than 2 days
  • Some functions still missing
  • Or not perfected
  • On Android Wear
  • Smartwatches still on the fringe
  • Not yet widespread

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 24
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-07-08, Author: Phil , review by: androidcentral.com

  • It's not at all flashy, but LG's first entry for Android Wear ends up being a solid buyThere's an argument to be made — and this isn't a hard one to make — that the watch isn't the most important part of Android Wear, Google's Android offshoot meant for t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-07, Author: Robbie , review by: neowin.net

  • The LG G Watch is one of the first smartwatches to hit the market, and be available for $229/£159 at the time of writing; through retailers like MobileFun and directly via Google Play Store . It's an affordable piece of modern technology designed to ma...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-07-07, Author: Kellex , review by: droid-life.com

  • As I mentioned in the video review, early adopters will likely enjoy their time with the LG G Watch, while the rest of the world will be better off waiting to see how the Android Wear platform grows and if manufacturers like Motorola and HTC can delive...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-07, Author: Blake , review by: techaeris.com

  • Abstract:  We are officially in the midst of smartwatch mania. Pebble made a boat load of money and has become a commonplace name among tech nerds. Samsung has not only released a smartwatch but has already iterated on it. It seems there is not a week that goes by w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-03, Author: Scott , review by: cnet.com

  • The G Watch shows off Android Wear's impressive voice recognition, Android phone connectedness, and potential for future app support. It has solid build quality, is water- and dust-resistant, and the included magnetic charger is easy to use
  • A generic-looking design, terrible battery life, a display that doesn't work in bright sunlight, a strange card-based notification system that doesn't always pop info you want, costs more, lacks the heart-rate monitor, and has a slightly weaker display th
  • The LG G Watch attempts to bring you the future on your wrist, but with its generic design, unimpressive battery life, and unpolished early software, you're better off waiting to see what else is around the bend....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-07-01, Author: Chris , review by: slashgear.com

  • At $229, LG's smartwatch is $30 more than its Samsung rival, and you have to particularly want some specific features in order to justify that difference. Comfort levels could be higher, and the strap is something most will probably want to replace for ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-30, Author: Dan , review by: tomsguide.com

  • Always-on displa, Comfortabl, Slick interfac, Good use of voice actions
  • No heart rate monito, Android Wear a work in progres, Lots of swiping required
  • LG's G Watch is a fairly svelte smartphone companion, but its Android Wear OS doesn't offer enough functionality. Google’s quest to own the smartwatch market has officially begun with the launch of its Android Wear operating system. And one of...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-30, Author: David , review by: theverge.com

  • Abstract:  Smartwatches have become a thing. They're a thing because Google says so, because it just released Android Wear and unleashed a torrent of wrist-bound devices. As a result, we're being forced to consider an important question: What is a smartwatch, anyway...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-27, Author: Chris , review by: techworld.com

  • While the LG G Watch is the cheapest, the Samsung Gear Live is a little thinner and lighter. It also has a heart rate monitor and a higher resolution screen which might make it worth an extra tenner from your wallet. Although it's likely to be more expens...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-08-06, review by: tekgadg.com

  • Abstract:  Our LG G Watch review is here!LG G watch is one of the first Android Wear devices to hit the market, and it acts as a second monitor for your smartphone. Watch the video above to see if you need yet another screen to carry around.Sean...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 24 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 24   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×