Testseek.com have collected 228 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-G975 Galaxy S10 Plus and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-G975 Galaxy S10 Plus.
(88%)
228 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(83%)
639 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
880100228
The editors liked
Superb display
Smooth performance and good battery life
Excellent cameras
Reverse wireless charging and headphone jack
Excellent design with an incredible display
One UI is a major improvement over the Samsung Touchwiz Experience
Performance and battery life is second to none
Triple-camera system snaps great pics quickly
Immersive Infinity-O display
Ultrasonic fingerprint sensor works well
Very fast performance
Superb battery life and can charge other gadgets wirelessly
Headphone jack
The Galaxy S10 Plus has a phenomenal AMOLED screen
Monster battery life and loads of useful camera tools. The option to wirelessly charge another device is convenient and really works
Great best-of-class performance
Gorgeous HDR+ display
Excellent camera performance
Innovative
Useful camera features
Wireless PowerShare
Great battery life
Beautiful
Sleek industrial design
Expandable storage
Superb edgeless screen
Powerful
High-end specs
Excellent for video capture
Incredible screen
Rich feature set
Extremely fast
Versatile camera system
Excellent display
Fast performance and strong battery life
A headphone jack
Amazing performance and software
Supports reverse wireless charging
Camera is great thanks to both software and lens
The editors didn't like
Just an evolutionary upgrade
Fiddly gesture controls
Pricey
Photos by Raj Rout
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
In-display fingerprint sensor is a little finicky
Hole in the display is an eyesore
Samsung's photo processing nowhere as good as Google's
Punch holes in display can be distracting
Confusing gesture controls
Nighttime and low-light shots on the Galaxy S10 Plus aren't as clear or crisp as dedicated night modes on the Pixel 3 and Huawei Mate 20 Pro. The ultrasonic in-screen fingerprint reader isn't always fast or accurate. Mispresses on the curved edge-to-edge
Expensive
Ultrasonic fingerprint reader not as convenient
It is expensive
Selfie cameras are merely average
Camera quality is so-so
Mediocre in-display fingerprint scanner
New in-screen fingerprint scanner is slower and more finicky than older ones
Camera performance not as good as Pixel in low light
Slow software update schedule
Fingerprint scanner is not very responsive
Low light photos are not as good as the Google Pixel 4
