us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung SM-A536 Galaxy A53 5G



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SM-A536 Galaxy A53 5G

Testseek.com have collected 174 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-A536 Galaxy A53 5G and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-A536 Galaxy A53 5G.
Award: Recommended March 2022
March 2022
 
(78%)
174 Reviews
Users
(84%)
421 Reviews
78 0 100 174

The editors liked

  • 120Hz AMOLED display is good
  • Capable cameras with OIS in the main 64MP camera
  • IP67 water-resistant body
  • Promise of 4 OS updates and 5 years of security updates
  • Excellent battery life
  • Stylish design 
  • Gorgeous display 
  • Long-lasting battery life 
  • Beautiful screen
  • Versatile cameras
  • Long battery life
  • Vibrant 120Hz AMOLED screen
  • Decent hardware
  • 64MP camera takes good photos
  • Battery lasts over a day
  • Four guaranteed Android OS updates
  • IP67 dust and water resistance
  • Stylish
  • Standout design
  • IP67 rating
  • Bright AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate
  • Solid battery life
  • Latest One UI 4.1 and Android 12 setup
  • Versatile quad camera setup
  • With OIS on the main 64MP snapper. Decent overall quality
  • 4K video recording wi
  • Good display with 120Hz refresh rate
  • Expandable storage up to 1TB
  • Nice design and build quality
  • Excellent software support
  • Gorgeous display
  • Really powerful and full-sounding speakers
  • Samsung One UI 4.1 out of the box
  • Solid build quality
  • Battery life is pretty great
  • Display
  • Cameras
  • Performance
  • Battery
  • Very good battery stamina
  • OS updates for four years
  • Security updates for five years
  • High-quality screen
  • Bright
  • Color-accurate display
  • Good stereo speakers
  • No throttling under load
  • Decent camera setup
  • Accurate positioning
  • Promise of long-term updates
  • IP certification

The editors didn't like

  • Exynos 1280 is not yet optimized for gaming
  • No charger in the box
  • No 3.5mm audio jack
  • 8
  • 19
  • I
  • Not ideal for gamers
  • Can't stream HDR content from Netflix
  • No headphone jack 
  • ShareTweetShare
  • Share
  • So-so performance all around
  • No support for wireless charging
  • No 3.5mm jack
  • No Wi-Fi 6 connectivity
  • Not designed for intensive gaming
  • No bundled charger
  • Still priced a bit too high compared to viable alternative devices
  • No charger included in the box unless your retailer bundles one
  • 3.5 mm audio jack is gone this year
  • No Wi-Fi 6 support and no FM radio
  • The new Exynos 1280 chipset performs worse than t
  • Mediocre performance
  • Pointless macro and depth cameras
  • Performance is really slow at times
  • Software
  • Design
  • No charger included
  • Samsung software is still cluttered
  • Saturated camera colors aren't for everyone
  • Slow Wi-Fi
  • Hardly any performance headroom
  • Slow storage
  • Moderate reception strength

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 18
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2022-04-08, Author: Allison , review by: theverge.com

  • Very good battery stamina, OS updates for four years, security updates for five years, High-quality screen
  • No charger included, Samsung software is still cluttered, Saturated camera colors aren't for everyone

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2022-04-08, review by: phonearena.com

  • Abstract:  Samsung's Galaxy A53 is the latest mid-ranger offer from the tech giant. Last year the Galaxy A52 5G was a great all round phone — one of the better ones in its segment...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2022-04-05, Author: Srivatsan , review by: fonearena.com

  • 120Hz AMOLED display is good, Capable cameras with OIS in the main 64MP camera, IP67 water-resistant body, Promise of 4 OS updates and 5 years of security updates, Excellent battery life,
  • Exynos 1280 is not yet optimized for gaming, No charger in the box, No 3.5mm audio jack, 8, 19, i,
  • Overall, the Galaxy A53 is the decent mid-range 5G smartphone from Samsung in the A series, but the A52s is still a better choice considering the better performance. It has a 120Hz Infinity-O AMOLED display, retains the 64MP camera with OIS, stereo speake...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2022-03-28, Author: Harish , review by: androidcentral.com

  • Vibrant 120Hz AMOLED screen, Decent hardware, 64MP camera takes good photos, Battery lasts over a day, Four guaranteed Android OS updates, IP67 dust and water resistance
  • No 3.5mm jack, No Wi-Fi 6 connectivity, Not designed for intensive gaming, No bundled charger
  • The Galaxy A53 5G is faster than its predecessor, has a larger battery, takes better photos, and will get more software updates than any other mid-range phone. It doesn't have a 3.5mm jack or a charger in the box, but the upside is that it costs $450 - $5...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2022-03-25, Author: Prateek , review by: 91mobiles.com

  • Stylish design , Gorgeous display , Long-lasting battery life ,
  • Not ideal for gamers, Can't stream HDR content from Netflix, No headphone jack , ShareTweetShare, Share
  • The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G might not be the fastest phone out there, but the handset still brings a lot to the table, including a versatile set of cameras, a good-looking design and a longevous software update roadmap. Coupled with its sturdy, polycarbonat...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2022-03-17, Author: Basil , review by: digitalcameraworld.com

  • Samsung's A-series darling is getting upgraded with an improved screen, new design, and more power, all the while bringing back what made last year's A52 5G so good – OIS, waterproofing, and an affordable price...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2022-02-05, Author: Ray , review by: cybershack.com.au

  • Decent all-day battery life and faster-charging capability, OS updates for four years, security updates for five years, Quality, bright sAMOLED screen, Camera is good, IP67 and microSD
  • The 2021 A52 5G is faster and better spec'd, No charger inbox, No Wi-Fi 6 (Exynos limitation), Phone signal strengths are good but limited to one tower, Samsung is becoming more of its own ecosystem with a little too much Samsung bloatware – Apple-like

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(55%)
 
  Published: 2022-06-27, Author: Andy , review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Pretty design, IP67 water-resistance, Camera is great for social media, Vibrant screen, Two-day battery life
  • Performance can be sluggish, Not an upgrade to the A52 and A52S
  • Yes. The Galaxy A53 5G is a good value considering its quality, ability, camera, and software. Editors' Recommendations Galaxy S23: Everything we know about Samsung's 2023 flagship Best tablet deals for June 2022 Best Phone Deals: Save on Google Pixel...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2022-05-20, Author: Tom , review by: techradar.com

  • Abstract:  You're about to see a whole lot of two different adjectives: ‘attractive', and ‘slow'. While conducting the testing for this Samsung Galaxy A53 review, we found many aspects of the phone could easily be described by one of those two adjectives.The A53 is...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2022-05-18, Author: Dominic , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • Stylish design, Great display, Impressive cameras, Excellent software support
  • Extremely sluggish performance, Slow charging, No charger included
  • The Galaxy A53 really only has one flaw, but it's such a big one that it makes the phone difficult to wholeheartedly recommend.Performance is sluggish, with stuttering and freezing common even during light use. At this price, a phone should run better.Tha...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 2 of 18 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 18   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×