us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Xiaomi Redmi Note 3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3

Testseek.com have collected 377 expert reviews of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Xiaomi Redmi Note 3.
Award: Highest Rated January 2016
January 2016
 
(80%)
377 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 377

The editors liked

  • Superb build quality and finish give off a premium vibe
  • 4000mAh battery
  • Good price/performance ratio
  • Reliable fingerprint scanner
  • Relatively compact considering the spec
  • The Redmi Note 3 features a premium metal body
  • Fingerprint scanner and a brilliant 5.5-inch display all at a low
  • Low
  • Price
  • Large
  • Highresolution display
  • Fast and reliable fingerprint scanner
  • Good sound quality during phone calls
  • Good battery life for the price
  • DualSIM phone
  • Premium metal build
  • Responsive fingerprint sensor
  • Great battery life
  • Smooth performance
  •  
  • Excellent design and build quality
  • Impressive battery life
  • Very good performance
  • Great software experience
  • Fast and accurate fingerprint reader
  • Includes an IR blaster for controlling household appliances
  • Great sunlight readability
  • Excellent call qu
  • Generally accurate test chart exposures in the lab
  • White balance is usually accurate with smooth convergence
  • Reasonably effective stabilisation
  • Fast autofocus performance
  • Acceptable autofocus tracking

The editors didn't like

  • No expandable storage
  • 13megapixel camera delivers average results
  • Unoriginal design
  • The camera
  • While adequate for a budget phone
  • Tends to overexpose shots and it's a shame the phone drops the removable battery feature found on the previous model
  • Mediocre photo quality
  • Software can be frustrating to deal with
  • Buying one outside of Asia takes time and may be costly
  • Boring design
  • Average cameras
  • Hybrid dualSIM vs dedicated dualSIM
  • Still runs Android Lollipop
  • No U.S. availability
  • Camera is still about average for the price
  • Display is lacking a bit in contrast and saturation
  • Low detail in all conditions
  • Variation in sharpness on consecutive frames
  • Frame drops occasionally visible

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 33 of 38
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2020-08-23, review by: kknews.cc

  • Abstract:  近日,外媒PhoneArena上手了一加6T,並對大熱的幾款旗艦進行了續航測試,沒有想到排在前面的幾款都是LCD屏機型,而一加6T榮登AMOLED 屏幕機型中的第一名 原文網址...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2020-04-01, review by: kknews.cc

  • Abstract:  近日,外媒PhoneArena上手了一加6T,並對大熱的幾款旗艦進行了續航測試,沒有想到排在前面的幾款都是LCD屏機型,而一加6T榮登AMOLED 螢幕機型中的第一名 原文網址...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-11-26, review by: kknews.cc

  • Abstract:  近日,外媒PhoneArena上手了一加6T,並對大熱的幾款旗艦進行了續航測試,沒有想到排在前面的幾款都是LCD屏機型,而一加6T榮登AMOLED 螢幕機型中的第一名...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-05-16, review by: kknews.cc

  • Abstract:  近日,外媒PhoneArena上手了一加6T,並對大熱的幾款旗艦進行了續航測試,沒有想到排在前面的幾款都是LCD屏機型,而一加6T榮登AMOLED 螢幕機型中的第一名。具體數據如圖,一加6T的續航成績為9小時52分鐘,3700毫安時的電池、一加續航最強機型確實名副其實。有意思的是,依然不及LCD螢幕的iPhone XR和華為Mate 20,該媒體表示 ,就AMOLED屏手機來講,一加6T的續航是他們測的最高成績...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-03-17, review by: kknews.cc

  • Abstract:  近日,外媒PhoneArena上手了一加6T,並對大熱的幾款旗艦進行了續航測試,沒有想到排在前面的幾款都是LCD屏機型,而一加6T榮登AMOLED 螢幕機型中的第一名。具體數據如圖,一加6T的續航成績為9小時52分鐘,3700毫安時的電池、一加續航最強機型確實名副其實。有意思的是,依然不及LCD螢幕的iPhone XR和華為Mate 20,該媒體表示 ,就AMOLED屏手機來講,一加6T的續航是他們測的最高成績...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-27, review by: kknews.cc

  • 紅米note3 全網通缺點:1、由於是個貼牌機,品控方面相對較差。有一部分人都反映開機鍵和音量鍵質量差, 會出現不靈敏甚至壞掉。2、wifi斷流,這好像是小米的通病。不管紅米還是小米系列,都有人反映。3、雖然是4000ma,一開始續航很舒服。但只要用一段時間(幾個月)就會明顯感覺電池沒之前那麼耐用。優點:1、性能在還沒出吃雞的時候完全不遜色,即使如今玩下王者榮耀也完全沒問題,至於吃雞還是別折磨自己了。. 安兔兔跑分2、在1000剛出頭的價格支持紅外遙控。雖然這東西使用較少,但是出到外面,看電視轉個...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-19, review by: kknews.cc

  • Abstract:  近日,外媒PhoneArena上手了一加6T,並對大熱的幾款旗艦進行了續航測試,沒有想到排在前面的幾款都是LCD屏機型,而一加6T榮登AMOLED 螢幕機型中的第一名。具體數據如圖,一加6T的續航成績為9小時52分鐘,3700毫安時的電池、一加續航最強機型確實名副其實。有意思的是,依然不及LCD螢幕的iPhone XR和華為Mate 20,該媒體表示 ,就AMOLED屏手機來講,一加6T的續航是他們測的最高成績。但外媒畢竟測試的只是少數附小白資料庫各機型續航測試結果從0到100充電時間...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-10-30, review by: kknews.cc

  • Abstract:  小米Note3穩定版終於迎來了更新,可是給大家一個「悲痛」的信息,那就是,那就是:是「灰度」版的,目前還只有「一小部分人群」可以「嘗鮮」,沒有收到的小夥伴們還請「稍安勿躁」的等待全面推送。需要系統聲音內錄的用戶慎更。升級為奧利奧是沒有系統聲音內錄的下面是更新詳細圖小編體驗後認為未修復問題有:通話聲音還是偏小,耗電會比miui9快,相機沒改善miui10的優點就不說了,網上太多文章可以查詢了已升級過1次安卓版本或機型發布時間較久、及已升級至少2次安卓版本的機型,出於對發布年限、穩定性、軟...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-03, review by: kknews.cc

  • 榮耀9上市之初是為了和小米6對抗的,這款手機的配置為麒麟960晶片,後置1200W+2000W像素黑白+彩色雙攝像頭前置800W的三攝方案,機身採用3D曲面極光玻璃,顏值頗高。螢幕採用的是5.15英寸小屏,支持多任務分屏。. 小米Note3是隨小米MIX2一起發布的,這一款被小米MIX2和小米6夾在中間的小米旗艦一度不被外界看好,搭載驍龍660晶片的小米Note3一度被廣大米粉所詬病。沒有採用小米6的機身工藝而採用和榮耀9一樣的玻璃機身讓小米Note3看起來更顯亮麗。後置雙1200W的雙攝像頭和前置16...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-17, Author: Sanji , review by: chinese.engadget.com

  • Abstract:  外觀及手感 光看外觀設計的話,Vivo X20 跟小米 Note 3 其實都稱不上有新意。前者在正面換上 18: 9 螢幕後,只是比較簡單粗暴地把指紋模組往穹頂式的背蓋上一放。要不是後來相繼出了幾款特別的配色及主題訂製機彌補,審美上真的會給人一種倒退的感覺。而 Note 3 這邊,發表時筆者已經說了它就是照過放大燈的 小米 6 。時至今日設計上雖然已經沒有太多可圈可點的地方,但個人對這套外觀還是認可的。唯一覺得遺憾就是小米還在用米 6 賣到現在的老配色(一藍一黑),產品在辨識度上感覺會有點弱。 相較之下...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 33 of 38 « Previous   1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×