us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 5D Mark 2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark 2

Testseek.com have collected 148 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 5D Mark 2 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 5D Mark 2.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2009
January 2009
 
(89%)
148 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
89 0 100 148

The editors liked

  • Very good photo quality
  • With a good lens (though see below)
  • Low noise levels through ISO 1600 in low light
  • And ISO 6400 in good light
  • Exceptionally well built body
  • With limited weather sealing
  • Beautiful 3inch LCD display
  • Plus a nice
  • Large viewf...
  • Movie mode
  • Fullframe sensor
  • 21.1megapixel resolution
  • Selfcleaning sensor
  • Excellent image quality over a range of lighting conditions from bright sunshine to dimly lit tunnels
  • One of the best cameras weve seen for shooting in low-light at high ISOs
  • Particularly strong at ISO 6400 which looks like ISO 400 in some older competi...
  • Narrow DOF
  • Lownoise sensor
  • External mic inputs
  • "Affordable" fullframe
  • High resolution camera
  • Full feature set
  • Excellent high ISO performance
  • Live View with 3 AF modes
  • HD video capabilities
  • Excellent image quality
  • Solid construction
  • Well-placed controls
  • Large viewfinder
  • 3 comprehensive status displays
  • 14-bit Analog to Digital conversion
  • Wide ISO range
  • Faster frame rate than its predecessor
  • Large
  • Hi...
  • Incredible image quality. High resolution. Low image noise at high ISOs. Jaw-dropping video capability. Live view. AF adjust.
  • Good ergonomics and build
  • Menu system
  • Comprehensive feature set and customisability
  • Info panel
  • Responsive
  • HD Movie capture.
  • 21.1MP full-frame sensor
  • Fine still and videos
  • Solid 3.9 fps shooting
  • Nose-bleed 25
  • 600 ISO
  • Excellent 3-inch LCD
  • Excellent performance and photo quality
  • Good video capture capabilities and quality.
  • Excellent resolution
  • Very close to Sony Alpha 900 (and essentially the same as EOS-1Ds Mark III)
  • Very good High ISO performance
  • Almost as good as Nikon D700 / D3
  • Wide range of ISO settings from 50 to 25600 (with ISO Expansion enabled) and useful auto...
  • Simple user interface. Selfcleaning sensor. Terrific highISO images. Peripheralillumination correction eliminates vignetting to keep brightness consistent across the entire image. Auto lighting optimizer boosts shadow detail. Full manual control over vide...
  • Great image quality
  • Expanded ISO range
  • HD video
  • Great interface.
  • Excellent still image and video quality. Solid design and great interface. Accommodates Canon’s best glass
  • In addition to a variety of other accessories. ...
  • Good noise control
  • Colour rendition
  • Great LCD screen
  • Usable video

The editors didn't like

  • Soft images straight out of the camera
  • Requires a good lens for best results
  • Some detail smudging from noise reduction
  • Even at low ISOs
  • White balance accuracy disappointed in several photo tests
  • Very slow contrast detect AF in live view mode
  • Even...
  • No builtin flash
  • Not ideal for fast action shots
  • Movie mode not easy to access
  • Hard to hold steady for movies
  • Pokey
  • Old autofocus system has trouble focusing in extreme low-light/low-contrast conditions
  • Annoying issue of "black dots" in some overexposed point lights still a problem at the time of this review
  • Some Chromatic Aberrations in certain high contrast...
  • No audio control
  • No manual video control
  • No 24p setting
  • Relatively slow burst mode
  • Autofocus a little slow in low light
  • Which is not a big deal but an onboard flash could be useful
  • On board microphone is fairly weak and monaural (an accessory mic is required for stereo recording)
  • JPEGs are slightly soft
  • Camera may be too large for those with smaller hands
  • Doesnt accept EF-S lenses
  • No pop-up flash
  • Only single cross-type AF sensor
  • AF array is small compared to overall image area
  • Relatively slow frame rate of 3.9 frames per...
  • Video can be cumbersome to control and is limited by short duration clips.
  • Excellent image quality
  • Good ergonomics and build
  • Menu system
  • Comprehensive feature set and customisability
  • Info panel
  • Responsive
  • HD Movie capture.
  • Expensive
  • Extensive noise at highest ISOs
  • Terrible audio recording
  • Flimsy doors covering jacks
  • *
  • No built-in wireless controller
  • Large spot meter
  • No built-in flash
  • More direct controls would be nice
  • AF system could use an update.
  • AI Servo (continuous AF) not as good as EOS-1 series or Nikon D700
  • Default noise reduction quite heavy at anything over ISO 400 (can be turned down though)
  • JPEG output a bit soft when viewed at 100%
  • Still pretty average automatic white balance in artif...
  • Autofocus system is not as fast as
  • Say
  • Nikon's.
  • New RAW modes have a slight color shift
  • Cheaper cameras available with larger feature set.
  • Records to CF cards
  • Which are slowly becoming extinct. Not terribly feature-rich. 21-megapixel RAW images eat memory like its their Birthday. ...
  • ISO 25
  • 600 unusable
  • Banding at high ISOs
  • Chromatic aberrations fail to be removed
  • Users may have preferred faster burst rate and/or more advanced focusing system to the inclusion of video mode

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 15
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-10-22, Author: Eric , review by: photographybay.com

  • Abstract:  I spent a few minutes with the new Leica SL mirrorless camera and the Vario-Elmarit-SL 24-90mm f/2.8-4 lens today and came away with a couple of key first impressions.First off, the camera and lens is huge and heavy. I just can't believe how large this ca...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-06-08, review by: The-digital-picture.com

  • Abstract:  A full Canon EOS Rebel T4i / 650D review is planned. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-06, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Let's compare the technical performance of the Nikon D4, D800, (same sensor and performance as the ), and , ......

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-14, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  A reader asks which of these two top cameras makes better images. Answer: NEITHER! If you're still wasting your time worrying about such trivia, I doubt you'll ever expend the , as opposed to merely armchair shopping fo...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-01, Author: Ivo , review by: camerastuffreview.com

  • ProsumerYear:2008Overall score:6.5Resolution:7Dynamic Range:6.3Noise:7.5Color:7.8Whitebalance:6.5Megapixels:21Sensor:FFSensor magn. 0.71fps:3.9Weight (gram):850MSRP NL (Euro):2499For proper performance enable JavaScript. Pages: 1Powered by Tools JX.S...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-20, review by: digital-photography-school.com

  • Abstract:  Here’s what Canon DSLR fans have been waiting for – the new Canon EOS 5D Mark II DSLR.This 21 megapixel DSLR (CMOS full frame sensor) has an ISO range of 50 to 25600, HD movie recording (seems to be the way we’re going), Live View framing of images on...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-05-01, review by: digital-photography-school.com

  • Abstract:  The question I’m getting the most since diving into the 5D world has been about “that infamous focusing issue”. I don’t think it would have been so infamous if the 7D hadn’t come out with such kickass focusing but now that everyone knows the possibili...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-07-14, review by: buy-n-shoot.com

  • Abstract:  Canon’s original 5D (released back in 2005) was arguably the best digital SLR ever produced by the well-known industry powerhouse. It was quickly and lovingly embraced by the photography community and has no doubt paved the way for its successor, the 5...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-08, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  If you're bothered by lateral color fringes, the Canon 5D Mark II has no ability to correct them, condemning you to having to use DxO software and modules to fix these common lens defects, while..

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-09, review by: wired.com

  • Simple user interface. Selfcleaning sensor. Terrific highISO images. Peripheralillumination correction eliminates vignetting to keep brightness consistent across the entire image. Auto lighting optimizer boosts shadow detail. Full manual control over vide...
  • Autofocus system is not as fast as, say, Nikon's.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
    page 1 of 15 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 15   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×