us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 5D Mark 3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark 3

Testseek.com have collected 212 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 5D Mark 3 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 5D Mark 3.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2012
April 2012
 
(90%)
212 Reviews
Users
(96%)
759 Reviews
90 0 100 212

The editors liked

  • Advertisement
  • First and foremost
  • The 5D Mark III takes beautiful photos
  • And improves on a camera that was already fantastic. The small changes on its body make the Mark III even more comfortable to use
  • While the tweaks made to button placement and the
  • Manual audio gain control
  • Headphone jack
  • Superb lowlight performance
  • 30minute maximum record time
  • Improved rolling shutter
  • Improved overall image quality
  • Better HD video quality and more robust feature set
  • More comfortable and durable
  • Weatherresistant camera build
  • Faster 6 fps burst speed
  • Vastly improved autofocus system
  • Very high resolution
  • Great image quality
  • Excellent hue accuracy
  • Superb high ISO performance
  • Real-time chromatic aberration and corner shading compensation
  • Good 24 x 36-inch prints from ISO 100-1
  • 600
  • ISO 102
  • 400 shots produce a good 4 x 6-inch pri...
  • Compact for a full-frame SLR. 22-megapixel resolution. Large optical viewfinder. Bright
  • High-res rear LCD. Fast autofocus. 6fps continuous shooting. Excellent high ISO performance. 1080p video recording.
  • The Canon EOS 5D Mark III offers a more streamlined shooting design
  • Significantly updated feature set with more configurability
  • Plus better performance over its predecessor. It maintains its excellent photo and video quality as well
  • Very low image noise
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Very accurate colors
  • Good automatic whitebalance
  • Spectacular subject tracking autofocus
  • Lightning fast autofocus
  • Full choice of exposure modes for movies
  • Classleading continuous buffer
  • Large viewfinde
  • Excellent photo/video quality
  • Excellent build quality
  • Advanced 61 point AF system
  • Speed
  • Features
  • Accuracy
  • Video
  • Incamera HDR (High Dynamic Range) feature combines three shots into one image with better exposure. “Silent” shooting mode helps capture stealthy candid portraits. Rank photos incamera with 15 stars
  • Then carry those ratings over to Adobe Lightroom
  • Adobe Bridge and Apple Aperture. Same 61point (41crosstypepoint) autofocus system as topoftheline Canon 1D X
  • Super fast and accurate 61 point AF system
  • Upgraded iFCL metering system better captures off-center subjects
  • Great low light opportunities thanks to expanded ISO range
  • Good resolution and detail in raw files
  • Good color and tonality across the ISO range
  • Reliable metering even in difficult contrast situations
  • Very responsive and snappy operation
  • Thanks to new Digic 5+ processor
  • 6 frames per second continuous shooting with good buffering
  • Excellent build-quality with magnesium shell and weather-sealing
  • Intuitive user interface and good ergonomics with larg
  • Great photo and video quality with low noise at high sensitivities
  • Powerful 61-point AF system with easy presets
  • Large viewfinder with 100% coverage and detailed 3
  • 2 screen
  • 6fps continuous shooting
  • Good ergonomics
  • Build quality and twin card slots.
  • Excellent set of features
  • Buildquality is much better than MkII
  • AF system and overall performance

The editors didn't like

  • Advertisement
  • Given how popular the 5D Mark II became in the videography community
  • We'd have liked to have seen the Mark III's video capabilities improved a bit more. The addition of a dedicated XLR microphone jack is probably a pipe drea
  • No uncompressed video out
  • Sluggish autofocus in liveview mode
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model
  • Starting price nearly $1
  • 000 higher than predecessor
  • Builtin mic only offers mono sound
  • Price
  • $3
  • 499
  • Www.usa.canon.com
  • Dynamic range not as good as competitors (deep shadow noise is rather high in raw files)
  • Auto and Incandescent white balance are quite warm in typical indoor lighting
  • Default noise reduction a bit high
  • Loses detail even at low ISOs
  • Flattens subtle ...
  • Expensive. Slow focus in Live View and Video modes. No built-in flash. Not compatible with EF-S lenses
  • JPEG photos at low ISO sensitivities don't match the generally excellent level of quality that you can otherwise get out of this camera
  • Underexposes often
  • Expanded ISO of limited use
  • Low rear control dial
  • Rear dial prone to accidental changes
  • Complex interaction between AF and lenses
  • Slow instant review
  • Slow to poweroff due to sensor cleaning
  • Best image quality from Raw (vs. JPEG)
  • Overly aggressive noise reduction
  • Monaural onboard microphone
  • Share & EnjoyTweet Author
  • Daniel m. east
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model. Starting price nearly $1
  • 000 higher than predecessor. Builtin mic only offers mono sound.
  • Noise can get pretty noticeable in the higher end of the ISO range
  • AF system is complicated and has a steep learning curve
  • Destructive noise reduction results in mushy JPEGs
  • Even at base ISO
  • Visible sharpening artifacts at default settings
  • Heavy-handed noise reduction leads to lack of low-contrast detail at higher ISOs
  • Distortion correction not available 'on the fly'
  • Built-in microphone only monaural
  • Soft video output with less dynamic range than stills
  • No built-in AF illuminator
  • No built-in flash or wireless controller
  • No built-in Wifi or GPS. Both are expensive accessories
  • No articulated screen
  • No interval timer
  • No movie crop mode
  • No clean HDMI
  • No continuous movie AF
  • 36 Megapixel Nikon D800 available for less.
  • Expensive compared to some rivals.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 11 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2020-01-05, review by: fotohits.de

  • Abstract:  Experten bewerten in Deutsch

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-16, review by: colorfoto.de

  • Abstract:  Das 50-mm-Objektiv gilt als die klassische Normalbrennweite, weil sein Bildwinkel an einer Kleinbildkamera dem des menschlichen Gesichtsfelds gut entspricht....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-12-13, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Unsere Kamera-Tests bieten zwar Orientierung bei der Auswahl der richtigen Kamera. Doch am Ende entscheidet der User selbst, welches Modell es für ihn sein soll. Welche Digicams derzeit besonders hoch im Kurs unserer Leser stehen, zeigt der CHIP Preisverg...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-05-21, review by: player.de

  • Die LCDAnzeige auf der rechten Kameraseite bietet dem Fotografen einen Überblick über die eingestellten Aufnahmeparameter. Der optische Bildstabilisator ist – wie bei Canon üblich – im Objektiv untergebracht, Um die Scharfstellung kümmert sich der neue Hi
  • hohes Gewicht, hoher Preis, kein integrierter Aufhellblitz

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-04-14, review by: colorfoto.de

  • Abstract:  Wer baut die leiseste Kamera? Malte Neumann hat sieben DSLRs sowie sechs spiegellose Systemkameras getestet....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-01-01, review by: dkamera.de

  • Sehr gute bis exzellente Bildqualität und Detailwiedergabe bis ISO 3.200, Gute Bildqualität bis ISO 12.800, Sehr hochwertiges Magnesium-Gehäuse mit ergonomisch geformtem Griff, Das Kameragehäuse ist gegen Staub und Spritzwasser abgedichtet, Großer und hel
  • Liveview- und Videoautofokus relativ langsam, Kein integriertes Blitzgerät
  • Die 5D-Serie war wegen ihr doch schwächeren Autofokusperformance und der nur langsamen Serienbildrate bisher hauptsächlich nur für Porträt- oder Landschaftsfotografen interessant, mit der Canon EOS 5D Mark III (Hands-On-Video) ändert sich dies aber rad...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(96%)
 
  Published: 2013-09-10, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Video filmen mit DSLR und DSLM - das heiße Thema für Film-Profis und Video-Amateure...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-04, review by: netzwelt.de

  • sehr gute Bildqualität, sehr gute Austattung, gute Videofunktion
  • langsamer Autofokus im Live-View, kein eingebauter Blitz
  • Canon liefert mit der EOS 5D Mark III eine gelungene, hochwertige Spiegelreflexkamera ab, die eine hervorragende Bildqualität aufweist und dem Fotografen eine umfangreiche Kontrolle bietet. Sie setzt allerdings voraus, dass der Nutzer sich auch intensiv m...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2012-07-02, review by: computerbild.de

  • Günstigster Preis im Internet: 2.095,00 Euro*Dieses Produkt bei Amazon bestellenProKeineKontraKeineTestnote der Redaktionnicht vorhandenNutzerwertungJetzt bewertenAlternative: Nikon D800Die zusätzlichen Bildpunkte auf dem Nikon-Sensor sorgen für besonders...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-06-28, review by: pc-magazin.de

  • Beide Kameras sind spitze – auf ihre eigene Weise. Canon versucht, seine Anhänger für jede Lichtsituation zu wappnen. Nikon punktet mit einer phänomenalen Auflösung, die jeden Studiofotografen vor Freude in die Luft springen lässt. Lichtmangel kennt man i...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 11 of 22 « Previous   1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×