us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 5D Mark 3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark 3

Testseek.com have collected 212 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 5D Mark 3 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 5D Mark 3.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2012
April 2012
 
(90%)
212 Reviews
Users
(96%)
759 Reviews
90 0 100 212

The editors liked

  • Advertisement
  • First and foremost
  • The 5D Mark III takes beautiful photos
  • And improves on a camera that was already fantastic. The small changes on its body make the Mark III even more comfortable to use
  • While the tweaks made to button placement and the
  • Manual audio gain control
  • Headphone jack
  • Superb lowlight performance
  • 30minute maximum record time
  • Improved rolling shutter
  • Improved overall image quality
  • Better HD video quality and more robust feature set
  • More comfortable and durable
  • Weatherresistant camera build
  • Faster 6 fps burst speed
  • Vastly improved autofocus system
  • Very high resolution
  • Great image quality
  • Excellent hue accuracy
  • Superb high ISO performance
  • Real-time chromatic aberration and corner shading compensation
  • Good 24 x 36-inch prints from ISO 100-1
  • 600
  • ISO 102
  • 400 shots produce a good 4 x 6-inch pri...
  • Compact for a full-frame SLR. 22-megapixel resolution. Large optical viewfinder. Bright
  • High-res rear LCD. Fast autofocus. 6fps continuous shooting. Excellent high ISO performance. 1080p video recording.
  • The Canon EOS 5D Mark III offers a more streamlined shooting design
  • Significantly updated feature set with more configurability
  • Plus better performance over its predecessor. It maintains its excellent photo and video quality as well
  • Very low image noise
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Very accurate colors
  • Good automatic whitebalance
  • Spectacular subject tracking autofocus
  • Lightning fast autofocus
  • Full choice of exposure modes for movies
  • Classleading continuous buffer
  • Large viewfinde
  • Excellent photo/video quality
  • Excellent build quality
  • Advanced 61 point AF system
  • Speed
  • Features
  • Accuracy
  • Video
  • Incamera HDR (High Dynamic Range) feature combines three shots into one image with better exposure. “Silent” shooting mode helps capture stealthy candid portraits. Rank photos incamera with 15 stars
  • Then carry those ratings over to Adobe Lightroom
  • Adobe Bridge and Apple Aperture. Same 61point (41crosstypepoint) autofocus system as topoftheline Canon 1D X
  • Super fast and accurate 61 point AF system
  • Upgraded iFCL metering system better captures off-center subjects
  • Great low light opportunities thanks to expanded ISO range
  • Good resolution and detail in raw files
  • Good color and tonality across the ISO range
  • Reliable metering even in difficult contrast situations
  • Very responsive and snappy operation
  • Thanks to new Digic 5+ processor
  • 6 frames per second continuous shooting with good buffering
  • Excellent build-quality with magnesium shell and weather-sealing
  • Intuitive user interface and good ergonomics with larg
  • Great photo and video quality with low noise at high sensitivities
  • Powerful 61-point AF system with easy presets
  • Large viewfinder with 100% coverage and detailed 3
  • 2 screen
  • 6fps continuous shooting
  • Good ergonomics
  • Build quality and twin card slots.
  • Excellent set of features
  • Buildquality is much better than MkII
  • AF system and overall performance

The editors didn't like

  • Advertisement
  • Given how popular the 5D Mark II became in the videography community
  • We'd have liked to have seen the Mark III's video capabilities improved a bit more. The addition of a dedicated XLR microphone jack is probably a pipe drea
  • No uncompressed video out
  • Sluggish autofocus in liveview mode
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model
  • Starting price nearly $1
  • 000 higher than predecessor
  • Builtin mic only offers mono sound
  • Price
  • $3
  • 499
  • Www.usa.canon.com
  • Dynamic range not as good as competitors (deep shadow noise is rather high in raw files)
  • Auto and Incandescent white balance are quite warm in typical indoor lighting
  • Default noise reduction a bit high
  • Loses detail even at low ISOs
  • Flattens subtle ...
  • Expensive. Slow focus in Live View and Video modes. No built-in flash. Not compatible with EF-S lenses
  • JPEG photos at low ISO sensitivities don't match the generally excellent level of quality that you can otherwise get out of this camera
  • Underexposes often
  • Expanded ISO of limited use
  • Low rear control dial
  • Rear dial prone to accidental changes
  • Complex interaction between AF and lenses
  • Slow instant review
  • Slow to poweroff due to sensor cleaning
  • Best image quality from Raw (vs. JPEG)
  • Overly aggressive noise reduction
  • Monaural onboard microphone
  • Share & EnjoyTweet Author
  • Daniel m. east
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model. Starting price nearly $1
  • 000 higher than predecessor. Builtin mic only offers mono sound.
  • Noise can get pretty noticeable in the higher end of the ISO range
  • AF system is complicated and has a steep learning curve
  • Destructive noise reduction results in mushy JPEGs
  • Even at base ISO
  • Visible sharpening artifacts at default settings
  • Heavy-handed noise reduction leads to lack of low-contrast detail at higher ISOs
  • Distortion correction not available 'on the fly'
  • Built-in microphone only monaural
  • Soft video output with less dynamic range than stills
  • No built-in AF illuminator
  • No built-in flash or wireless controller
  • No built-in Wifi or GPS. Both are expensive accessories
  • No articulated screen
  • No interval timer
  • No movie crop mode
  • No clean HDMI
  • No continuous movie AF
  • 36 Megapixel Nikon D800 available for less.
  • Expensive compared to some rivals.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 12 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-06-06, review by: magnus.de

  • Bei der Canon 5D Mark III legt die Bildqualität gegenüber der Vorgängergeneration zwar nur im oberen Empfindlichkeitsbereich ab ISO 800 zu, aber sie ist so stark, dass sie eine Empfehlung verdient. Darüber hinaus bietet sie unzählige kleinere und größe...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-06-03, Author: Stefan , review by: digitalkamera.de

  • Hervorragende Verarbeitung, Sehr weitgehend individualisierbar, Sehr rauscharm bis ISO 3.200, Tolle Haptik
  • Kein eingebauter Blitz, JPEGBilder wirken leicht weich, Sehr teuer, Kein Klappdisplay
  • Mit der EOS 5D Mark III ist Canon eine ausgezeichnete Modellpflege gelungen. Wirklich spektakulär erscheinen die Verbesserungen zwar nicht und auch die Bildqualität ist nahezu gleich gut geblieben. Dennoch, die dritte Generation ist noch etwas besser und...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2012-05-14, review by: Slashcam.de

  • Die Revolution bei der Produktentwicklung im Canon EOS VDSLR-Segment - gleichbedeutend mit dem Namen Canon EOS 5D Mark II - musste beim Nachfolger Canon EOS 5D Mark III der sanften Evolution und der Etablierung des Canon Cinema EOS Segments weichen. Da...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-11, review by: Cnet.de

  • ausgezeichnete Foto und Videoqualität, extrem gute Ausstattung und Anpassbarkeit, deutliche Leistungssteigereung, hervorragende Haptik,
  • JPEGFotos bei niedrigen ISOEmpfindlichkeiten enttäuschen, kein sauberer HDMIVideoAusgang,
  • Die Canon EOS 5D Mark III ist eine hervorragende Kamera, kein Zweifel. Im direkten Vergleich zur 5D Mark II macht deren Nachfolgerin insbesondere in Sachen Autofokus und Anpassbarkeit deutliche Fortschritte. Wer in diesen Disziplinen mit der Vorgänger...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(86%)
 
  Published: 2012-05-09, Author: Rudi , review by: Slashcam.de

  • Abstract:  Wie man sieht, liefert die 5D Mark II bei ähnlicher "Schärfe" deutliche Artefakte, die bei der Nachschärfung wirklich unappetitlich zu Tage treten. Ganz anders die 5D Mark III. Auch sie zeichnet definitiv kein Signal mit voller HD-Auflösung auf und wirkt ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-13, review by: Chip.de

  • Äußerst geringes Bildrauschen, Zeigt hohe Schärfe und viele Details, Durchdachte Ausstattung und Bedienung, Üppige Video-Funktionen, Lange Akku-Laufzeit
  • Autofokus im Live-View, Kein interner Blitz
  • Canon bietet mit der EOS 5D Mark III die optimale Allround-Kamera für anspruchsvolle Fotografen. Die Bildqualität ist über jeden Zweifel erhaben. Schärfe, Bildrauschen und die Detailtreue sind bis in den hohen ISO-Bereich spitze. Damit setzt die 5D Mark I...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(92%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-06, review by: Slashcam.de

  • Wer vom neuen All-I der Canon EOS 5D Mark III einen Sprung in der Bildqualität erwartet, welcher der Verdreifachung der im Vergleich zum IPB-Verfahren entspricht, wird enttäuscht sein. Die Bildqualitäten sind selbst dann auf gleichem Niveau, wenn man...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-02, review by: Cnet.de

  • AutofokusModul der EOS 1D X, viele Verbesserungen bei Bedienung & Design,
  • kein sauberer HDMIVideoOutput, hoher Preis,
  • Die Canon EOS 5D Mark III bringt sehr viele Neuerungen und Verbesserungen in Canons 5D-Linie und rückt mit der großzügigen Ausstattung näher das Flaggschiff-Modell heran als ihre Vorgängerin. Allerdings schlägt sich das auch entsprechend auf den Preis...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-02, review by: netzwelt.de

  • Abstract:  Canon hat sein neuestes Modell der EOS-Reihe vorgestellt. Die EOS 5D Mark III soll im Vergleich zum Vorgänger eine verbesserte Leistung in nahezu jedem Bereich bieten, bei der Konstruktion nutzte Canon das Feedback von Profi-Fotografen. Die EOS 5D Mar...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-04, review by: profifoto.de

  • Abstract:  Experten bewerten in Deutsch...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(89%)
    page 12 of 22 « Previous   1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×