us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Fujifilm FinePix X10



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Fujifilm FinePix X10

Testseek.com have collected 120 expert reviews of the Fujifilm FinePix X10 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm FinePix X10.
Award: Editor’s Choice November 2011
November 2011
 
(84%)
120 Reviews
Users
(87%)
157 Reviews
84 0 100 120

The editors liked

  • Zooming rangefinder is fun
  • Much improved menu system over X100
  • The kind of camera you grow to like more over time
  • Good photo quality when using dynamic range correction
  • High grade
  • Professional quality body with rangefinderstyle design and manual zoom ring
  • Fast
  • High quality F2.02.8
  • 28 112 mm lens
  • Sensorshift image stabilization
  • 2.8" LCD is fluid
  • Sharp
  • And easy to see in all conditions
  • Large optical viewfinder has 85% coverage
  • EXR CMOS sensor produces betterthanaverage high sensitivity photos (at 6M
  • Very nicely designed body
  • Smooth
  • Silent manual zoom
  • Bright optical viewfinder
  • Very bright lens
  • Especially for a zoom
  • Fairly quick AF and fast shutter lag
  • Above average high ISO performance for a compact camera
  • Improved dynamic range with EXR D-...
  • Best image quality in its peer group
  • Great quality viewfinder and tilting screen
  • Good continuous AF in the middle of the frame
  • Built-in Wifi with smartphone remote control
  • Silent shutter option. E-Shutter up to 1/32000
  • Sharp photos. Good video quality. Large optical viewfinder. Lots of physical controls. Fast
  • 4x zoom lens. Retro styling.
  • Low image noise
  • Usable until ISO 3200
  • Superb dynamic range
  • Excellent metering
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Nicely saturated colors
  • Mechanical zoom
  • Great ergonomics
  • Fast focus system
  • Good shottoshot speeds
  • Responsive interface
  • Neocamera
  • Photography Blog
  • Incredibly good-looking
  • Excellent picture and video quality
  • Fast focusing performance
  • Very good JPEG image quality in 6MP capture modes
  • EXR sensor technology provides impressive dynamic range and noise performance
  • Very sharp zoom lens with an f/2.0-2.8 aperture
  • Image stabilization that offers roughly a 3 stop advantage
  • Extensive manual control points including a mode dial and two Fn buttons
  • Good range of image quality parameters
  • Excellent in-camera raw conversion
  • Go
  • Design and overall feel
  • Viewfinder
  • Results from 2/3in sensor and intuitive handling.

The editors didn't like

  • Slow on autofocus
  • Manual focus slow and fiddly
  • Though wellbuilt
  • Body still has plasticy feel
  • LCD could be higherresolution
  • Strong highlight clipping (use the DR correction to reduce
  • Though noise will increase)
  • Unusual white disc/orb problem makes photos look awkward (to say the least)
  • Some "jaggies" in photos
  • EXR sensor's most useful features require drop in resolution
  • Increase in ISO
  • AF system occasional fails to lock focus
  • Then works fine a second later
  • Adjusting focus manually is clunky and slow
  • Camera lo
  • The white disc problem (on initial production models)
  • Demosaicing artifacts more common than other cameras
  • Slightly soft corners at telephoto
  • Anamorphic distortion at wide-angle
  • Overly complex electronic options
  • Confusing persistence of some setti...
  • Basic movie quality and capabilities
  • No touchscreen
  • No RAW at 100 ISO. RAW starts at 200 ISO
  • Basic three-frame AE bracketing
  • Microphone input uses 2.5mm jack
  • Continue
  • In depth
  • Somewhat awkward handling. So-so low-light performance. LCD could be sharper. Pricey
  • Below average whitebalance accuracy
  • Not ExposurePriority
  • Incorrect preview of WB
  • Wrong LiveHistogram
  • Imperfect Custom WB
  • Poor optical viewfinder
  • Short batterylife
  • Minimal grip
  • Complicated to use effectively
  • No interchangeable lenses
  • Poor battery life
  • Image quality of 12MP JPEG files is lacking compared to peers with more conventional sensors
  • Poor image quality of Raw files processed via the bundled (and other third party) software
  • Live view is partially obscured by menu overlay
  • Optical viewfinder placement means the lens barrel is visible at wide to medium focal lengths
  • Very limited manual controls for video recording
  • Visible artifacts
  • A bit too much image processing at higher ISOs

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-02-01, review by: digital-photography-school.com

  • Quality: Excellent; some of the best pictures I've taken with a compact digicam.Why you'd buy the X10: it feels like a ‘real' camera; excellent menu display; the tilt indicator is a help.Why you wouldn't: you want a longer zoom range; you want an LCD scre...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-27, Author: Jim , review by: pcmag.com

  • Sharp photos. Good video quality. Large optical viewfinder. Lots of physical controls. Fast, 4x zoom lens. Retro styling.
  • Somewhat awkward handling. So-so low-light performance. LCD could be sharper. Pricey
  • The Fujifilm X10 has one of the larger sensors in a compact, zooming camera, but doesn't control noise in low light as well as you'd expect. Its ergonomics make handling a bit awkward, but enthusiasts will be happy with the sharp images that this retro-s...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-22, review by: etechreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Fujifilm FinePix X10 hits quite a lot of significant high notes with speedy performance, attractive retro design and nice, fast lens. It is a sophisticated small device with retro design, 4X 28-112mm zoom lens with manual zoom ring, 12-megapixel CMOS s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-21, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  The Fuji X10 is a very solid and well-made point-and-shoot digital camera, with the same tiny sensor size and resultant technical image quality as every other digital point-and-shoot. Technically, the X10 has nothing in com...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-15, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • The X10 defies category, so it doesn’t seem fair to lump it in with prosumer point-and-shoots. Whatever it is, this camera will easily become your go-to fixed-lens option......

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-12, Author: Devin , review by: techcrunch.com

  • Zooming rangefinder is fun, Much improved menu system over X100, The kind of camera you grow to like more over time,
  • Slow on autofocus, manual focus slow and fiddly, Though wellbuilt, body still has plasticy feel, LCD could be higherresolution
  • While people interested in getting into serious photography would do better to pick up a DSLR and a nice starter prime lens, the X10 is a charming and fairly powerful camera that anyone, photographer or not, will have fun using. A larger sensor for low...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-06, Author: David , review by: theverge.com

  • Incredibly good-looking, Excellent picture and video quality, Fast focusing performance
  • Complicated to use effectively, No interchangeable lenses, Poor battery life

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-28, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Design and overall feel, viewfinder, results from 2/3in sensor and intuitive handling.
  • A bit too much image processing at higher ISOs
  • Just like the X100 before it, the X10 is another lovely premium compact camera from Fujifilm. The understated, classic design looks the part, while the build-quality can't be faulted. The controls fall to the hand with ease and the inclusion of a useab...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(91%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-23, review by: photographyblog.com

  • The Fujifilm Finepix X10 follows in the footsteps of its bigger brother, the X100, by bringing a similar retro feel, quality build quality and photographer-friendly design to a wider audience. It may only be a humble compact camera at heart, but boy, ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-28, review by: digitalcamerainfo.com

  • What we saw of the X10 at PhotoPlus was very encouraging. We were told that our demo model was a pre-production version, but we have a tough time believing that what we saw will be much different from what consumers will get when it debuts in in early...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×