us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Fujifilm FinePix X10



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Fujifilm FinePix X10

Testseek.com have collected 120 expert reviews of the Fujifilm FinePix X10 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm FinePix X10.
Award: Editor’s Choice November 2011
November 2011
 
(84%)
120 Reviews
Users
(87%)
157 Reviews
84 0 100 120

The editors liked

  • Zooming rangefinder is fun
  • Much improved menu system over X100
  • The kind of camera you grow to like more over time
  • Good photo quality when using dynamic range correction
  • High grade
  • Professional quality body with rangefinderstyle design and manual zoom ring
  • Fast
  • High quality F2.02.8
  • 28 112 mm lens
  • Sensorshift image stabilization
  • 2.8" LCD is fluid
  • Sharp
  • And easy to see in all conditions
  • Large optical viewfinder has 85% coverage
  • EXR CMOS sensor produces betterthanaverage high sensitivity photos (at 6M
  • Very nicely designed body
  • Smooth
  • Silent manual zoom
  • Bright optical viewfinder
  • Very bright lens
  • Especially for a zoom
  • Fairly quick AF and fast shutter lag
  • Above average high ISO performance for a compact camera
  • Improved dynamic range with EXR D-...
  • Best image quality in its peer group
  • Great quality viewfinder and tilting screen
  • Good continuous AF in the middle of the frame
  • Built-in Wifi with smartphone remote control
  • Silent shutter option. E-Shutter up to 1/32000
  • Sharp photos. Good video quality. Large optical viewfinder. Lots of physical controls. Fast
  • 4x zoom lens. Retro styling.
  • Low image noise
  • Usable until ISO 3200
  • Superb dynamic range
  • Excellent metering
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Nicely saturated colors
  • Mechanical zoom
  • Great ergonomics
  • Fast focus system
  • Good shottoshot speeds
  • Responsive interface
  • Neocamera
  • Photography Blog
  • Incredibly good-looking
  • Excellent picture and video quality
  • Fast focusing performance
  • Very good JPEG image quality in 6MP capture modes
  • EXR sensor technology provides impressive dynamic range and noise performance
  • Very sharp zoom lens with an f/2.0-2.8 aperture
  • Image stabilization that offers roughly a 3 stop advantage
  • Extensive manual control points including a mode dial and two Fn buttons
  • Good range of image quality parameters
  • Excellent in-camera raw conversion
  • Go
  • Design and overall feel
  • Viewfinder
  • Results from 2/3in sensor and intuitive handling.

The editors didn't like

  • Slow on autofocus
  • Manual focus slow and fiddly
  • Though wellbuilt
  • Body still has plasticy feel
  • LCD could be higherresolution
  • Strong highlight clipping (use the DR correction to reduce
  • Though noise will increase)
  • Unusual white disc/orb problem makes photos look awkward (to say the least)
  • Some "jaggies" in photos
  • EXR sensor's most useful features require drop in resolution
  • Increase in ISO
  • AF system occasional fails to lock focus
  • Then works fine a second later
  • Adjusting focus manually is clunky and slow
  • Camera lo
  • The white disc problem (on initial production models)
  • Demosaicing artifacts more common than other cameras
  • Slightly soft corners at telephoto
  • Anamorphic distortion at wide-angle
  • Overly complex electronic options
  • Confusing persistence of some setti...
  • Basic movie quality and capabilities
  • No touchscreen
  • No RAW at 100 ISO. RAW starts at 200 ISO
  • Basic three-frame AE bracketing
  • Microphone input uses 2.5mm jack
  • Continue
  • In depth
  • Somewhat awkward handling. So-so low-light performance. LCD could be sharper. Pricey
  • Below average whitebalance accuracy
  • Not ExposurePriority
  • Incorrect preview of WB
  • Wrong LiveHistogram
  • Imperfect Custom WB
  • Poor optical viewfinder
  • Short batterylife
  • Minimal grip
  • Complicated to use effectively
  • No interchangeable lenses
  • Poor battery life
  • Image quality of 12MP JPEG files is lacking compared to peers with more conventional sensors
  • Poor image quality of Raw files processed via the bundled (and other third party) software
  • Live view is partially obscured by menu overlay
  • Optical viewfinder placement means the lens barrel is visible at wide to medium focal lengths
  • Very limited manual controls for video recording
  • Visible artifacts
  • A bit too much image processing at higher ISOs

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-12-16, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Great looks and build quality; Sharp, realistic pictures; Film simulation modes
  • None
  • The X10 looks as good as it feels. The retro styling, dependence on buttons and switches in place of menus, and a sharp, bright lens make it a joy to use. It isn't cheap, but it's certainly built to last, and the quality of its images won't disappoint....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-13, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Metal body, sturdy build, Fast zoom lens (f/2.8 in telephoto) with manual controls, Picture quality (lens and electronics), General design and handling, Full HD video with zoom and stereo sound, Optical viewfinder better than competitors' versions
  • Bulky design, Poor battery life (less than 200 photos), Some annoying design features (no EXR functions in manual mode, no video button), Viewfinder isn't very comfortable, no information displayed, sharpness varies with zoom
  • With the X10, Fuji has come up with a decent rival for traditional, beefy expert compacts like the Canon G12 and Nikon P7100. It has loads of advanced functions, direct-access settings, physical controls and takes great-quality pictures. Plus, the zoom...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-10, Author: Tony , review by: amateurphotographer.co.uk

  • In boasting a high build quality, intuitive handling and a fast lens, the Fujifilm FinePix X10 combines the best of both high-end compact camera types, such as the larger Canon PowerShot G12 and Nikon P7100, with the smaller Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 and Ol...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-07, Author: Audley , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Fantastic styling and solid build quality, Manual zoom control is more intuitive, Optical viewfinder is large and bright, Useful EXR and Advanced shooting modes, Fast Fujinon lens produces sharp, bright images
  • Produces ugly white discs in place of highlights, White balance can take time to adjust
  • Overall image quality is superb, with the X10 able to deliver consistently sharp, bright and vibrant images. The Fujinon optic particularly impresses, delivering very high levels of corner to corner sharpness while resolving plenty of fine detail too. Tha...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-06, Author: Liam , review by: reviewed.com

  • Abstract:  It's been a strong year for Fujifilm. They've launched a number of well-received higher-end shooters, including the HS20EXR and F600EXR long zooms, and especially the X100 premium compact. They've all had some pretty notable flaws, but each has earned a l...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-06, Author: Liam , review by: reviewed.com

  • Abstract:  It's been a strong year for Fujifilm. They've launched a number of well-received higher-end shooters, including the HS20EXR and F600EXR long zooms, and especially the X100 premium compact. Each of these have had some pretty notable flaws, but they have al...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-05, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Great build, bright f2-2.8 lens, excellent images (save for specular highlight issue), zooming optical viewfinder
  • Specular highlights can morph into white dots, no viewfinder feedback/LCD, 85 percent field of view from viewfinder, no ND filter
  • A compact like no other: the X10’s retro style is met with excellent performance, an impressive viewfinder, a superb manual zoom lens and bags of on-body controls that make for ease of use. It’s the perfect partner for discerning shooters and far bette...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-05, review by: techradar.com

  • Premium build quality, Excellent handling, Optical viewfinder, Bright, clear screen, Good ISO performance for a compact
  • No marking in the viewfinder, Fiddly bezel on the rear, Weak built in flash
  • ForPremium build qualityExcellent handlingOptical viewfinderBright, clear screenGood ISO performance for a compact...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-01, Author: Gavin , review by: T3.com

  • Solid build quality, Retro styling, EXR sensor
  • Cost, No lens flexibility, Smaller sensor
  • There will undoubtedly be some wondering why Fuji didn’t go the whole hog and allow the lens to be swapped on the X10 too, especially as this camera’s build quality and feature set will appeal to a similar market. Our spies tell us that such a camera

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-09-01, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The X10 is due in November, and we're excited about it, but we're still waiting to see what its price will be. It looks loaded, but we're hoping the X10's price tag will be more like cameras like the PowerShot G12, the Coolpix P7100, and the Lumix LX5 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×