us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Fujifilm FinePix X10



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Fujifilm FinePix X10

Testseek.com have collected 120 expert reviews of the Fujifilm FinePix X10 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm FinePix X10.
Award: Editor’s Choice November 2011
November 2011
 
(84%)
120 Reviews
Users
(87%)
157 Reviews
84 0 100 120

The editors liked

  • Zooming rangefinder is fun
  • Much improved menu system over X100
  • The kind of camera you grow to like more over time
  • Good photo quality when using dynamic range correction
  • High grade
  • Professional quality body with rangefinderstyle design and manual zoom ring
  • Fast
  • High quality F2.02.8
  • 28 112 mm lens
  • Sensorshift image stabilization
  • 2.8" LCD is fluid
  • Sharp
  • And easy to see in all conditions
  • Large optical viewfinder has 85% coverage
  • EXR CMOS sensor produces betterthanaverage high sensitivity photos (at 6M
  • Very nicely designed body
  • Smooth
  • Silent manual zoom
  • Bright optical viewfinder
  • Very bright lens
  • Especially for a zoom
  • Fairly quick AF and fast shutter lag
  • Above average high ISO performance for a compact camera
  • Improved dynamic range with EXR D-...
  • Best image quality in its peer group
  • Great quality viewfinder and tilting screen
  • Good continuous AF in the middle of the frame
  • Built-in Wifi with smartphone remote control
  • Silent shutter option. E-Shutter up to 1/32000
  • Sharp photos. Good video quality. Large optical viewfinder. Lots of physical controls. Fast
  • 4x zoom lens. Retro styling.
  • Low image noise
  • Usable until ISO 3200
  • Superb dynamic range
  • Excellent metering
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Nicely saturated colors
  • Mechanical zoom
  • Great ergonomics
  • Fast focus system
  • Good shottoshot speeds
  • Responsive interface
  • Neocamera
  • Photography Blog
  • Incredibly good-looking
  • Excellent picture and video quality
  • Fast focusing performance
  • Very good JPEG image quality in 6MP capture modes
  • EXR sensor technology provides impressive dynamic range and noise performance
  • Very sharp zoom lens with an f/2.0-2.8 aperture
  • Image stabilization that offers roughly a 3 stop advantage
  • Extensive manual control points including a mode dial and two Fn buttons
  • Good range of image quality parameters
  • Excellent in-camera raw conversion
  • Go
  • Design and overall feel
  • Viewfinder
  • Results from 2/3in sensor and intuitive handling.

The editors didn't like

  • Slow on autofocus
  • Manual focus slow and fiddly
  • Though wellbuilt
  • Body still has plasticy feel
  • LCD could be higherresolution
  • Strong highlight clipping (use the DR correction to reduce
  • Though noise will increase)
  • Unusual white disc/orb problem makes photos look awkward (to say the least)
  • Some "jaggies" in photos
  • EXR sensor's most useful features require drop in resolution
  • Increase in ISO
  • AF system occasional fails to lock focus
  • Then works fine a second later
  • Adjusting focus manually is clunky and slow
  • Camera lo
  • The white disc problem (on initial production models)
  • Demosaicing artifacts more common than other cameras
  • Slightly soft corners at telephoto
  • Anamorphic distortion at wide-angle
  • Overly complex electronic options
  • Confusing persistence of some setti...
  • Basic movie quality and capabilities
  • No touchscreen
  • No RAW at 100 ISO. RAW starts at 200 ISO
  • Basic three-frame AE bracketing
  • Microphone input uses 2.5mm jack
  • Continue
  • In depth
  • Somewhat awkward handling. So-so low-light performance. LCD could be sharper. Pricey
  • Below average whitebalance accuracy
  • Not ExposurePriority
  • Incorrect preview of WB
  • Wrong LiveHistogram
  • Imperfect Custom WB
  • Poor optical viewfinder
  • Short batterylife
  • Minimal grip
  • Complicated to use effectively
  • No interchangeable lenses
  • Poor battery life
  • Image quality of 12MP JPEG files is lacking compared to peers with more conventional sensors
  • Poor image quality of Raw files processed via the bundled (and other third party) software
  • Live view is partially obscured by menu overlay
  • Optical viewfinder placement means the lens barrel is visible at wide to medium focal lengths
  • Very limited manual controls for video recording
  • Visible artifacts
  • A bit too much image processing at higher ISOs

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 7 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-11-23, review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • Excellent clarity & lownoise images, Beautiful design & build quality, Fast & bright f/22.8 lens
  • Slow & inaccurate autofocus
  • The Fujifilm X10 shares one defining trait with its elder sibling, the X100. Like the X100, there's so much about the X10 that is excellent; its design, build quality and image quality. And like the X100, the X10 is flawed, with its spotty auto-focus, ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-21, Author: Isabelle , review by: parentesis.com

  • El diseño es retro y robusto, pero compacto, es un gran atractivo de esta cámara. Además, el lente es muy rápido, se tarda como máximo un segundo entre cada captura
  • Aunque tiene algunas funciones manuales, las tomas salen mejor en modo automático, a menos que ya le hayas agarrado el modo a la cámara y aprendas bien cómo lograr una buena foto; si decides hacer esto, te tomará un poco de tiempo
  • Por su diseño, es un cámara dirigida a los amantes de la fotografía que siempre han querido una con apariencia “antigua”....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-12, review by: xataka.com

  • Abstract:  Devoradas en la parte baja por los teléfonos móviles y en la superior por las sin espejo , las cámaras compactas están pasando por un proceso de reinvención a base de mejores sensores y un toque de distinción y exclusividad. En Xataka Foto hemos querido ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-03, review by: 01net.com

  • Grand capteur de compact,  Design rétro,  Modes manuels et RAW,  Viseur optique,  Optique lumineuse,  Zoom à vis
  • Pas de capteur de reflex,  Définition d'écran quelconque
  • Le X10 est un compact séduisant : son look rétro est du plus bel effet, la construction est excellente et la qualité d'image de très bon niveau, avec une très bonne gestion des hautes sensibilités et des couleurs très justes. Une arme de choix pour les ut...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-15, review by: clubic.com

  • Zoom 4X homogène / stabilisation optique, Qualité d'image / hautes sensibilités / AF, Ergonomie typée pro / design / finition, Discrétion / réactivité / fonctionnalités
  • OVF décevant (mais mieux que les autres), Autonomie / encombrement Vs compacts, Vidéo trop compressée / prix, Mode EXR / quelques couacs d'interface
  • Le X100 nous avait conquis, le X10 nous a assurément emballés. Il troque certes le superbe capteur APS-C de son ainé contre un CMOS à peine plus grand que ceux de ses meilleurs concurrents, mais il hérite en contrepartie d'un zoom 4X très équilibré et qua...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-06, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Encombrement important, Autonomie insuffisante (moins de 200 photos), Détails ergonomiques agaçants (pas d'EXR en mode manuel, pas de déclencheur vidéo séparé), Viseur encore peu confortable, pas d'informations et variation de netteté pendant le zoom
  • Le Fuji X10 est une belle réplique aux compacts experts "mastocs", Canon G12 et Nikon P7100. Fonctions avancées, accès directs et qualité d'image sont là, et le démarrage par la bague de zoom est un régal. Reste une faute qui lui fait perdre la cinquiè...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-28, review by: focus-numerique.fr

  • Abstract:  Nouveau venu dans la gamme des compacts experts chez Fujifilm (gamme X), le X10 a la difficile tâche de côtoyer l'excellent X100, équipé d'un capteur APS-C à 12 Mpx. L'atout du X10, c'est la présence d'un capteur CMOS inversé (BSI : Back Side Illuminat...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-28, Author: Renaud , review by: focus-numerique.fr

  • Bonne gestion du bruit électronique jusqu'à 1600 ISO, Qualité de fabrication et bonne tenue en mains, Viseur optique assez large et lumineux, Zoom de bonne qualité et lumineux, Bague de zoom manuelle parfaitement fluide, Bon mode macro 1 cm, Mise sous ten
  • Viseur sans indication (notamment la mise au point). Pas de correction de la parallaxe, Pas d'écran inclinable, Touche Raw non personnalisable en dehors du format d'enregistrement, Autonomie limitée de la batterie (à peine 200 vues), Format Raw propriétai

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-22, review by: erenumerique.fr

  • Après son superbe mais très exclusif X100, Fujifilm continue sa série premium avec un modèle plus abordable qu’il est possible de classer dans la catégorie des compacts experts. Doté d’un capteur rétro-éclairé et d’un zoom très lumineux, il promet de b...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-02-14, Author: Maurizio , review by: saggiamente.com

  • Design ricercato e senza tempo,  Struttura molto robusta, con superiore ed inferiore in lega di magnesio,  Plastiche "rugose" piacevoli al tatto e resistenti,  Obiettivo luminosissimo (f/22.8) e piuttosto esteso (28112mm),  Molti controlli manuali e due t
  • File RAW troppo rumorosi da 1600 ISO in su (meglio scattare in RAWJPG),  Nel mirino si vede un angolo dell'obiettivo,  Durante la registrazione su scheda non si può agire su altri comandi,  L'ergonomia è un po' forzata per la posizione del pollice, ma ci
  • La Fujifilm X10 non è perfetta, ma ha carattere e sostanza. Pur facendo ottenere buoni risultati nel punta-e-scatta, la vedo più come un'amica che bisogna imparare a conoscere nel tempo. Dopo un po' si comprenderanno i suoi limiti e come aggirarli per ma...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
    page 7 of 12 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×