us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Nikon D700



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon D700

Testseek.com have collected 106 expert reviews of the Nikon D700 and the average rating is 91%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon D700.
Award: Most Awarded August 2008
August 2008
 
(91%)
106 Reviews
Users
(100%)
9 Reviews
91 0 100 106

The editors liked

  • Excellent photo quality with a quality lens
  • Out of this world high ISO performance
  • Full frame sensor means no crop factor to deal with (unless youre using a DXformat lens)
  • Dust reduction system
  • Built like a brick
  • Large
  • Super high resolution 3inc...
  • Exceptional high ISO performance
  • Great image quality
  • Solid construction
  • Allaround high performance
  • Combines the “full-frame” low-noise performance of the D3 with the rugged portability of the D300
  • Small
  • Sturdy build feels like an F100 film camera
  • More accurate skintones from D3
  • Fast and accurate autofocus system
  • Comes with in-camera se...
  • Rugged construction with magnesium alloy body and full environmental sealing
  • Gorgeous
  • High-resolution 3-inch LCD
  • Fast 5 fps continuous shooting
  • With a deep buffer
  • Optional battery grip improves performance to 8 fps
  • High resolution with excellent ...
  • Excellent photo quality as high as ISO 6
  • 400
  • Fast focus and shooting
  • Even in low light
  • First-rate build quality and control layout.
  • Full-frame sensor with superb high ISO quality
  • Tough build and great ergonomics
  • Quick 51-point AF and 5fps shooting
  • 3in VGA screen with Live View.
  • Noise control
  • LCD screen
  • Overall image quality
  • Focusing system
  • Metering
  • White balance
  • Excellent high ISO performance. Extensive interface and features. Rugged
  • Durable body. Compatible with many accessories and all FX and DX lenses. ...

The editors didn't like

  • Iderable drop in resolution with DXformat lensesPoor RAW image editing software included
  • Better RAW editor and remote capture software cost extra
  • Slow contrast detect AF
  • No live histogram in live view mode
  • Rubber cover over side I/O ports doesnt l...
  • Viewfinder only 95 percent
  • Shorter shutter duty cycle
  • AF times out a hair slower than the D3
  • But performs comparably in the real world
  • Flimsy
  • Plastic CF card door doesn’t lock
  • Only 5fps speed without battery grip
  • Helpful Active D-Lighting feature bogs down buffer.
  • 51-point Auto-area AF mode a bit slow for a camera of this caliber
  • JPEGs are a little soft straight from the camera
  • But respond well to post-processing
  • Auto white balance handles incandescent lighting poorly
  • Deep menu system (but hey
  • With so many ...
  • 'Only' 12 MP is not up to standards of 2011
  • Viewfinder accuracy of 95%
  • Color accuracy at tungsten light
  • Noisy shutter
  • Not very handy menu structure
  • Big and heavy compared tot Canon 5D MK
  • Relatively heavy
  • Low resolution for its class
  • Viewfinder only provides 95 percent coverage and lacks interchangeable focusing screens
  • Occasional issues with automatic white balance under artificial light.
  • High price premium of full-frame sensor
  • No Live Histogram in Live View
  • Anti-dust not particularly effective in our tests
  • PC control and RAW software not bundled.
  • No DX masking
  • Very minor handling issues
  • Capture NX 2 only a trial
  • DX lenses bring on the crop factor. Zooming in Playback gets pixilated. Viewfinder coverage is only 95%. ...

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-11-01, review by: shutterbug.com

  • Abstract:  The D700 raises some interesting questions about the future of the D-SLR class. Just how many megapxiels do you need to achieve very good image quality at a large print size? And does 12.1 (effective) megapixels in a full-frame sensor stand up against ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-11-01, review by: Kickstartnews.com

  • Abstract:  Praise Nikon for including an effective, built-in sensor cleaning system (something which is missing from the D3). Higher marks still to Nikon for including a customizable My Menu feature. Its easy to select any number of frequently used menu items an...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-10-02, review by: layersmagazine.com

  • Abstract:  A few weeks back, I went ahead and bought the new Nikon D700, but I really wanted to spend some time with it, and shoot in a number of different situations and scenarios, before I gave you my review. Now that I have a few thousands shots on it, I’...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-10-02, review by: pdnonline.com

  • Combines the “full-frame” low-noise performance of the D3 with the rugged portability of the D300; small, sturdy build feels like an F100 film camera; more accurate skintones from D3; fast and accurate autofocus system; comes with in-camera se...
  • Flimsy, plastic CF card door doesn’t lock; only 5fps speed without battery grip; helpful Active D-Lighting feature bogs down buffer.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-16, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Noise control, LCD screen, overall image quality, focusing system, metering, white balance
  • No DX masking, very minor handling issues, Capture NX 2 only a trial
  • Nikon has played a smart card with the D700, where professional credentials meet affordability. For professionals in particular the camera is ideal as a backup body, while the enthusiast will be spoiled by both its performance in a variety of situation...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2008-09-10, review by: digitalcamerainfo.com

  • Abstract:  The Nikon D700 and its big brother, the D3, allow you to take available light pictures in near darkness, with remarkably little image noise. This is not a subtle enhancement: it opens the door to new photographic possibilities. While the most spectac...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-04, review by: photographyblog.com

  • Its practically impossible to review the Nikon D700 as a standalone camera, so many features and functions harking back to the earlier D300, the D3, or both. Its inevitable perhaps that it doesnt quite have the initial impact on the senses of its t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-09-01, review by: digitalcamerareview.com

  • Exceptional high ISO performance, Great image quality, Solid construction, Allaround high performance,
  • Viewfinder only 95 percent, Shorter shutter duty cycle, AF times out a hair slower than the D3, but performs comparably in the real world,
  • When the D700 was finally unveiled, the similarities between it and the D3 were many and obvious – it literally appeared as if Nikon had largely transported a D3 into a D300 body. After having shot the D700 for a week and the D3 since January 2008, tha...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-08-14, review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Rugged construction with magnesium alloy body and full environmental sealing, Gorgeous, high-resolution 3-inch LCD, Fast 5 fps continuous shooting, with a deep buffer, Optional battery grip improves performance to 8 fps, High resolution with excellent ...
  • 51-point Auto-area AF mode a bit slow for a camera of this caliber, JPEGs are a little soft straight from the camera, but respond well to post-processing, Auto white balance handles incandescent lighting poorly, Deep menu system (but hey, with so many ...
  • Nikon has done it again, producing a market-leading digital SLR that sets a new standard for image quality and ISO performance. Stacked up against its nearest competitor, the three-year-old Canon 5D, the Nikon D700 wins in high ISO performance and over...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-08-13, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Nikon D700 AF Settings © 2008 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved. Nikon D700 Rear AF Controls. I get my goodies at Ritz, Amazon and Adorama. It helps me keep adding to this site when you get yours from those links, too. August 2008 Nikon D700 ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×