us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Nikon D700



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon D700

Testseek.com have collected 106 expert reviews of the Nikon D700 and the average rating is 91%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon D700.
Award: Most Awarded August 2008
August 2008
 
(91%)
106 Reviews
Users
(100%)
9 Reviews
91 0 100 106

The editors liked

  • Excellent photo quality with a quality lens
  • Out of this world high ISO performance
  • Full frame sensor means no crop factor to deal with (unless youre using a DXformat lens)
  • Dust reduction system
  • Built like a brick
  • Large
  • Super high resolution 3inc...
  • Exceptional high ISO performance
  • Great image quality
  • Solid construction
  • Allaround high performance
  • Combines the “full-frame” low-noise performance of the D3 with the rugged portability of the D300
  • Small
  • Sturdy build feels like an F100 film camera
  • More accurate skintones from D3
  • Fast and accurate autofocus system
  • Comes with in-camera se...
  • Rugged construction with magnesium alloy body and full environmental sealing
  • Gorgeous
  • High-resolution 3-inch LCD
  • Fast 5 fps continuous shooting
  • With a deep buffer
  • Optional battery grip improves performance to 8 fps
  • High resolution with excellent ...
  • Excellent photo quality as high as ISO 6
  • 400
  • Fast focus and shooting
  • Even in low light
  • First-rate build quality and control layout.
  • Full-frame sensor with superb high ISO quality
  • Tough build and great ergonomics
  • Quick 51-point AF and 5fps shooting
  • 3in VGA screen with Live View.
  • Noise control
  • LCD screen
  • Overall image quality
  • Focusing system
  • Metering
  • White balance
  • Excellent high ISO performance. Extensive interface and features. Rugged
  • Durable body. Compatible with many accessories and all FX and DX lenses. ...

The editors didn't like

  • Iderable drop in resolution with DXformat lensesPoor RAW image editing software included
  • Better RAW editor and remote capture software cost extra
  • Slow contrast detect AF
  • No live histogram in live view mode
  • Rubber cover over side I/O ports doesnt l...
  • Viewfinder only 95 percent
  • Shorter shutter duty cycle
  • AF times out a hair slower than the D3
  • But performs comparably in the real world
  • Flimsy
  • Plastic CF card door doesn’t lock
  • Only 5fps speed without battery grip
  • Helpful Active D-Lighting feature bogs down buffer.
  • 51-point Auto-area AF mode a bit slow for a camera of this caliber
  • JPEGs are a little soft straight from the camera
  • But respond well to post-processing
  • Auto white balance handles incandescent lighting poorly
  • Deep menu system (but hey
  • With so many ...
  • 'Only' 12 MP is not up to standards of 2011
  • Viewfinder accuracy of 95%
  • Color accuracy at tungsten light
  • Noisy shutter
  • Not very handy menu structure
  • Big and heavy compared tot Canon 5D MK
  • Relatively heavy
  • Low resolution for its class
  • Viewfinder only provides 95 percent coverage and lacks interchangeable focusing screens
  • Occasional issues with automatic white balance under artificial light.
  • High price premium of full-frame sensor
  • No Live Histogram in Live View
  • Anti-dust not particularly effective in our tests
  • PC control and RAW software not bundled.
  • No DX masking
  • Very minor handling issues
  • Capture NX 2 only a trial
  • DX lenses bring on the crop factor. Zooming in Playback gets pixilated. Viewfinder coverage is only 95%. ...

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-01-01, review by: photo.net

  • Hannah ThiemAfter the introduction of the D3, most of the speculations were that Nikon’s second FX-format DSLR would be a high-pixel-count camera in the 20+MP range to compete against Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III, $6550 (review). Another school of thought...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-10-01, review by: bythom.com


 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: olegnovikov.com

  • Abstract:  For me personally, introduction of the Nikon D700 finally brought about the camera that at long last felt as a warranted upgrade from the Nikon D70s that I had used from May 2005. The main reason why I did not replace my D70s with its successor, the D...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-16, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Full-frame sensor, smaller and lighter body than the D3, useful Live View, virtual horizon, comfortable to use
  • Slightly slower than the D3
  • If you’re already a D-SLR user, the next step up is a full-frame camera. Consider the D700 for its size and more competitive price compared to the top-of-the-line D3, as you won’t lose too much in the way of features and capabilities. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-09-05, review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • Like the D3 the D700 automatically detects DX lenses, which have a smaller exposure circle, and shows a crop rectangle in the viewfinder. You lose some pixels but you get a perfect picture. Images are noise free with wide dynamic range and beautiful to...
  • This is not a complaint, merely an observation. With a full frame sensor depth of field is reduced, by comparison with an APS sized sensor, for any given f stop. Closer attention needs to be paid of ISO, aperture and shutter speed. Fortunately the sens...
  • Someone has calculated that for a digital camera to match the resolving power of film it needs to have 14 megapixels on a full frame sensor. If that is right then this camera comes close to the ideal. Like its close siblings, the D300 and the D3, the D...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-04, review by: smh.com.au

  • Abstract:  This 12-megapixel camera has an FX sensor (full 35 millimetre-film frame size) as used in the professional D3. The camera body is more akin to the DX (APS size sensor) D300, but without some of the touches such as extra dust and moisture sealing...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-08-01, Author: Margaret , review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Nikons D700 is positioned between the pro-sumer D300 and the professional D3 models and is the second Nikon DSLR with an FX-format (35mm sized) CMOS sensor. Like the D3 it can use lenses designed for both FX and DX formats and will automatically rec...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-01, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Abstract:  Full-frame is probably what every aspiring photographer dreams of at night. At one point, it was almost unattainable as this feature was present only in high-end models that cost a limb or two. Then along came Canon which released the EOS 5D and made f...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-07-15, review by: Photoradar.com

  • UPDATE – January 2011: read our latest news about a rumoured release date in 2011. The D700 is Nikon's second FX format camera - the first was the flagship D3, which was released last summer.FX format is Nikon's term for full-frame – in other words, t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-28, review by: itreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Only if you know the benefits and limitations of the Nikon D300 very well can you see the merits of having a Nikon D700. The results are definitely there, but with the price of the D300 falling every month it could be argued that its not enough to ju...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 5 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×