us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2

Testseek.com have collected 124 expert reviews of the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2.
Award: Most Awarded February 2015
February 2015
 
(87%)
124 Reviews
Users
(89%)
785 Reviews
87 0 100 124

The editors liked

  • Great flip/tilt-out touchscreen
  • More dials and buttons
  • Better grip
  • Weather-sealing
  • 40-megapixel high-res mode
  • Tons more video recording frame rates
  • High-resolution electronic viewfinder
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • All shooting modes are accurate and easy in all situations
  • IAuto produces a much brighter
  • More vivid image
  • Dedicated Video Capture Button is always ready to record
  • WeatherResistant body is ready for almost any shooting conditions
  • Excellent overall im
  • High image quality
  • Especially the 40-megapixel shots
  • Best Olympus video camera
  • The same large viewfinder image as an SLR with full-frame sensor
  • Perfect image stabilization
  • Even for video
  • Electronic shutter with completely silent mode and 1/16
  • 000 sh
  • Compact. Quick 10.4fps burst rate. Sharp EVF. Vari-angle touch-screen LCD. Excellent control layout. 40-megapixel High Res mode. In-body image stabilization. Weather-sealed design. Large lens library. PC sync socket. Wi-Fi.
  • Petite
  • Weather-sealed body
  • Excellent photo and video quality
  • Five-axis image stabilization
  • Large articulating LCD with tap-to-focus
  • Electronic viewfinder
  • Excellent image quality
  • Very good metering
  • Reliable Automatic WhiteBalance
  • Superb builtin stabilization
  • Virtually no shutterlag
  • Fast contrastdetect AF
  • Fast shottoshot speed
  • Very responsive
  • Excellent automatic Manual Focus Assist
  • Good build qualit
  • Excellent handling in a compact
  • Crisp
  • Roomy electronic viewfinder
  • Image quality that can take the fight to APS-C DSLRs
  • Unique high-res mode lets it bat far above its weight for static scenes
  • Extremely fast 10 fps burst shooting
  • Very good image quality - good dynamic range and color
  • Extensive and customizable external controls
  • Excellent build quality and sense of solidity
  • Class-leading image stabilization - also available for video recording
  • Broad set of features to support v
  • Small weatherproof body with great controls
  • Fantastic built-in stabilization works with any lens
  • Big
  • Detailed viewfinder and fully-articulated touch screen
  • Fast accurate focusing with great face and eye detection
  • Built-in Wifi with powerful mobile ap
  • Excellent operating speed
  • Great build quality including weather resistance
  • Full customisation of most controls Great JPEG image quality

The editors didn't like

  • Still no 4K video recording
  • Pro or premium lens required to get best high-res mode shots
  • Slightly lower battery life
  • Some may consider iAuto to be over the top with color
  • Almost unrealistic
  • High resolution shots only from a tripod and of non-moving subjects
  • Limited shots per burst. High Res mode requires sturdy tripod and static subject. Subject tracking disappoints. Omits built-in flash. Lacks 4K support
  • Overly complex interface
  • No built-in flash
  • Autofocus sometimes sluggish in low light
  • Poor color accuracy
  • Strong antialias filter
  • Not always ExposurePriority and frequently wrong LiveHistogram
  • 1080p @ 60 FPS has recording 8s limit
  • 1s filming delay
  • Weak LCD hinge
  • Uncomfortable eyelets
  • Short batterylife
  • Control dials are easily bumped
  • Below-average battery life at default settings
  • Buffer depths for raw shooters are a bit limited
  • 16-megapixel sensor resolution feels dated
  • Weak bundled flash strobe
  • Low resolution by contemporary standards
  • Complex menu system and extensive customization options can be overwhelming
  • Video output not as detailed as it could be
  • Default autofocus settings limit camera performance
  • Native image quality similar to previous models
  • 40MP mode requires specific conditions and lenses to shine
  • Continuous AF becomes less confident with fast subjects
  • Timelapse and miniature movies encoded at low frame rate
  • Slow wakeup when Quick Sleep is
  • Raw image quality doesn't quite match competition
  • Menu interface somewhat challenging
  • A few design errors

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 13
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-11-21, review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  Last updated: November 21, 2017If you're getting serious about photography and don't mind spending a bit more money, you'll find some amazing cameras in the $1000-1500 price range. These cameras have excellent sensors (some full-frame), advanced autofocus...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-21, review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  Last updated: November 21, 2017If you're getting serious about photography and don't mind spending a bit more money, you'll find some amazing cameras in the $1000-1500 price range. These cameras have excellent sensors (some full-frame), advanced autofocus...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-02, review by: dpreview.com

  • Google is holding a competition that could see your Pixel photos gracing millions of screens. Nikon's 100th birthday party continues worldwide as a distributor in Italy organized a one-of-a-kind feat: assembling the world's largest 'human camera' from ov...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-11-10, Author: Carey , review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  These days, many (if not most) consumers are likely to shop based on price and capability, rather than according to whether a certain model contains a mirror, or not. We think this is a good thing; with all the increased competition, cameras are improving...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-09-19, Author: Darren , review by: gizmodo.com

  • Abstract:  All images: Alex Cranz/Gizmodo In late August I spent to weeks traipsing through Europe—on very important work assignments in London, and taking in the local culture of Amsterdam. Being a gadget blogger, I couldn't pass up the opportu...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-05-16, Author: Carey , review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  These days, many (if not most) consumers are likely to shop based on price and capability, rather than according to whether a certain model contains a mirror, or not. We think this is a good thing; with all the increased competition, cameras are improving...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-04-01, review by: examiner.com

  • Abstract:  After 10 years of carrying heavy DSLR gear around (or in more recent months, NOT carrying DSLR gear around due to the bulk and inconvenience), I started considering reducing the size of my kit. I'd been hearing a lot of good coming out of the mirrorless c...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-01-12, Author: Greg , review by: pdnonline.com

  • Abstract:  No other camera category has seen as much innovation and novelty as the mirrorless market over the past several years, and the latest crop of models are a testament to that. They're driving forward not only new features but more compact designs targeted a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-11-17, Author: Carey , review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  In late 2015, many (if not most) consumers are likely to shop based on price and capability, rather than according to whether a certain model contains a mirror, or not. We think this is a good thing; with all the increased competition, cameras are improvi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-07, Author: Dan , review by: shutterbug.com

  • The E-M5 Mark II is another evolutionary improvement in Olympus' OM-D line of mirrorless, compact system cameras. While this attractive, retro-style shooter (which looks like a cross between a miniature SLR and a rangefinder) doesn't break much new ground...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 13 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 13   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×