us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2

Testseek.com have collected 124 expert reviews of the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mk 2.
Award: Most Awarded February 2015
February 2015
 
(87%)
124 Reviews
Users
(89%)
785 Reviews
87 0 100 124

The editors liked

  • Great flip/tilt-out touchscreen
  • More dials and buttons
  • Better grip
  • Weather-sealing
  • 40-megapixel high-res mode
  • Tons more video recording frame rates
  • High-resolution electronic viewfinder
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • All shooting modes are accurate and easy in all situations
  • IAuto produces a much brighter
  • More vivid image
  • Dedicated Video Capture Button is always ready to record
  • WeatherResistant body is ready for almost any shooting conditions
  • Excellent overall im
  • High image quality
  • Especially the 40-megapixel shots
  • Best Olympus video camera
  • The same large viewfinder image as an SLR with full-frame sensor
  • Perfect image stabilization
  • Even for video
  • Electronic shutter with completely silent mode and 1/16
  • 000 sh
  • Compact. Quick 10.4fps burst rate. Sharp EVF. Vari-angle touch-screen LCD. Excellent control layout. 40-megapixel High Res mode. In-body image stabilization. Weather-sealed design. Large lens library. PC sync socket. Wi-Fi.
  • Petite
  • Weather-sealed body
  • Excellent photo and video quality
  • Five-axis image stabilization
  • Large articulating LCD with tap-to-focus
  • Electronic viewfinder
  • Excellent image quality
  • Very good metering
  • Reliable Automatic WhiteBalance
  • Superb builtin stabilization
  • Virtually no shutterlag
  • Fast contrastdetect AF
  • Fast shottoshot speed
  • Very responsive
  • Excellent automatic Manual Focus Assist
  • Good build qualit
  • Excellent handling in a compact
  • Crisp
  • Roomy electronic viewfinder
  • Image quality that can take the fight to APS-C DSLRs
  • Unique high-res mode lets it bat far above its weight for static scenes
  • Extremely fast 10 fps burst shooting
  • Very good image quality - good dynamic range and color
  • Extensive and customizable external controls
  • Excellent build quality and sense of solidity
  • Class-leading image stabilization - also available for video recording
  • Broad set of features to support v
  • Small weatherproof body with great controls
  • Fantastic built-in stabilization works with any lens
  • Big
  • Detailed viewfinder and fully-articulated touch screen
  • Fast accurate focusing with great face and eye detection
  • Built-in Wifi with powerful mobile ap
  • Excellent operating speed
  • Great build quality including weather resistance
  • Full customisation of most controls Great JPEG image quality

The editors didn't like

  • Still no 4K video recording
  • Pro or premium lens required to get best high-res mode shots
  • Slightly lower battery life
  • Some may consider iAuto to be over the top with color
  • Almost unrealistic
  • High resolution shots only from a tripod and of non-moving subjects
  • Limited shots per burst. High Res mode requires sturdy tripod and static subject. Subject tracking disappoints. Omits built-in flash. Lacks 4K support
  • Overly complex interface
  • No built-in flash
  • Autofocus sometimes sluggish in low light
  • Poor color accuracy
  • Strong antialias filter
  • Not always ExposurePriority and frequently wrong LiveHistogram
  • 1080p @ 60 FPS has recording 8s limit
  • 1s filming delay
  • Weak LCD hinge
  • Uncomfortable eyelets
  • Short batterylife
  • Control dials are easily bumped
  • Below-average battery life at default settings
  • Buffer depths for raw shooters are a bit limited
  • 16-megapixel sensor resolution feels dated
  • Weak bundled flash strobe
  • Low resolution by contemporary standards
  • Complex menu system and extensive customization options can be overwhelming
  • Video output not as detailed as it could be
  • Default autofocus settings limit camera performance
  • Native image quality similar to previous models
  • 40MP mode requires specific conditions and lenses to shine
  • Continuous AF becomes less confident with fast subjects
  • Timelapse and miniature movies encoded at low frame rate
  • Slow wakeup when Quick Sleep is
  • Raw image quality doesn't quite match competition
  • Menu interface somewhat challenging
  • A few design errors

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 8 of 13
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-03-09, Author: Maurizio , review by: saggiamente.com

  • Costruzione robusta e tropicalizzata, Corpo compatto dalla migliorata ergonomia, Ricca di controlli fisici, Personalizzazioni avanzate per ogni tasto e funzione, Pratica e veloce da usare in manuale, Buona qualità d'immagine, Buona resa ad alti ISO per un
  • Alcune funzioni utili sono nascoste in menu complicati, Durata della batteria ridotta
  • In molte parti di questa recensione mi sono trovato a sottolineare i miglioramenti della Olympus E-M5 II rispetto la prima generazione. Ho provato a contarli e sono oltre 50, alcuni più importanti altri meno, ma tutti contribuiscono a rendere la nuova ve...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2019-12-13, review by: fotohits.de

  • Abstract:  Schon der Fünf-Achsen-Bildstabilisator der ersten OM-D E-M5 beeindruckte. Das System wurde für die neue Mark-II-Version aber noch weiter verbessert. Getestet in Ausgabe: FOTO HITS 04/2015...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-09-05, review by: allesbeste.de

  • Abstract:  Die beste spiegellose Systemkamera in der Preisklasse bis 1.300 Euro inklusive Objektiv ist die Fujifilm X-T30. Den Testsieg schafft sie durch gute Allround-Eigenschaften, vor allem aber auch, weil es sie zu diesem Preis schon mit einem qualitativ hochwe...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-01-02, review by: stereopoly.de

  • Die Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II MFT Systemkamera bietet ziemlich viel fürs Geld. Die Verarbeitung ist tadellos und das Design spricht an, auch wenn man etwas für den Retro-Look übrig haben muss.Die Bildqualität ist vor allem in den niedrigeren ISO Bereichen...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-05-10, Author: Andreas , review by: golem.de

  • Die Olympus E-M5 II hat Vor- und Nachteile. Die Autofokus-Geschwindigkeit und die Trefferquote sind außerordentlich hoch, obwohl nur ein Kontrastmessverfahren genutzt wird. Von der Samsung NX1 wird sie bei bewegten Motiven auch dank dort genutzter Hybrid-...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-02, Author: Sven , review by: computerbild.de

  • Großer Sucher mit hoher Auflösung, Hohe Bildqualität, Wetterfest, Kompakt und leicht
  • Bildqualität leidet bei hoher ISO-Einstellung
  • Die Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II liefert sehr detailreiche und knackig scharfe Bilder. Hohe ISO-Werte mag die E-M5 Mark II nicht so gerne, doch dank des sehr wirksamen Bildstabilisators braucht man die nicht so oft. Der Autofokus stellt schnell und präzise s...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-03-24, Author: Dennis , review by: netzwelt.de

  • Verarbeitung, Bildstabilisator, hochauflösender Bildmodus, Konfigurationsmöglichkeiten, Geschwindigkeit, beigelegter Blitz
  • kein Zebra, kein 4K-Video, komplexes Kameramenü
  • Die OM-D E-M5 Mark II ist eine würdige Nachfolgerin der E-M5. Keine derzeit am Markt befindliche Systemkamera bietet so viele innovative Ideen in einem Gehäuse zu einem Preis von knapp 1.100 Euro. Bezüglich der Ausstattung übertrifft die Mark II teilweise...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-03-13, Author: Jan , review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  Die Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II lockt mit starkem Bildstabilisator und bis zu 40 Megapixel. Wie sie sich schlägt, verrät der COMPUTER BILD-Check....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-27, review by: dkamera.de

  • Gute bis sehr gute Bildqualität (bis ISO 800), Auch hohe ISO-Werte bis ISO 3.200 noch relativ gut nutzbar, Sehr hochwertiges sowie abgedichtetes Magnesiumgehäuse, Die Kamera liegt gut in der Hand, Hochauflösendes, dreh- und schwenkbares 3,0 Zoll Display m
  • Die Touchscreenfunktion könnte besser und flexibler arbeiten, Kein integriertes Blitzgerät (im Lieferumfang wird ein Aufsteckblitz aber mitgeliefert), Sucher lässt sich bei seitlich ausgeklapptem Display nicht verwenden
  • Der Bildsensor der Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II (Datenblatt) besitzt die klassischen Micro-Four-Thirds-Abmessungen von 17,3 x 13,0mm und löst 15,9 Megapixel (4.608 x 3.456 Pixel) auf. Was den ISO-Bereich angeht werden ebenfalls klassenübliche ISO 200 bis ISO...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2015-02-24, Author: Moritz , review by: Chip.de

  • Handlicher Magnesium-Body, Gute Bildqualität, Schneller Autofokus, Scharfe Bildschirme, WLAN, Touch- und Schwenkdisplay, Starker Stabilisator, Brauchbarer 40-Megapixel-Modus, Schnelle Serienaufnahme
  • die aber nur kurz anhält, Detailtreue ab ISO 800
  • Die Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II punktet im Test mit hoher Geschwindigkeit und starker Technik. Allen voran der extrem effiziente Bildstabilisator begeistert mit seiner hohen Verwacklungs-Kompensierung. Der Bildsensor der Micro-Four-Thirds-DSLM gefällt derw...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
    page 8 of 13 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×