Testseek.com have collected 3 expert reviews of the Sony Mavica MVC-FD91 and the average rating is 0%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sony Mavica MVC-FD91.
-
3 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
-01003
The editors liked
Good
Comfortable ergonimics
Fast
Responsive operating system
Manual everything controls
Aperture priority
Shutter priority
Manual white balance
Manual focus
Fast (if sometimes a little inaccurate) auto-focus
Short startup / shutter lag / cycle times
The editors didn't like
Floppy disks (having to change disks and carry boxes of disks around is a huge let-down)
High JPEG compression as a concequence of using floppy disks
Only 1024 x 768 resolution
Video quality (not photographic quality) lens system
Abstract: Manufacturer Overview Sony has long been a dominant player in the digital camera field with their Mavica(tm) line of floppy-disk based cameras. In this review, we cover the first Mavica we've tested extensively, the FD91. This camera has been one of the d...
Abstract: This is the Sony Mavica FD-91, it has a 850,000-pixel progressive scan CCD that yields 1024x768 images. The first thing you notice is that huge 14X zoom lens. This is the longest focal length lens available on any digital camera. The other feature that...
Good, comfortable ergonimics, Fast, responsive operating system, Manual everything controls: Aperture priority, Shutter priority, Manual white balance, Manual focus, Fast (if sometimes a little inaccurate) auto-focus, Short startup / shutter lag / cycle times
Floppy disks (having to change disks and carry boxes of disks around is a huge let-down), High JPEG compression as a concequence of using floppy disks, Only 1024 x 768 resolution, Video quality (not photographic quality) lens system
This camera always generates a lot of interest because of it's similarities with traditional SLR cameras, the flexilibity of it's controls promise such a good camera, but it is I'm afraid to say let down by a poor optical and CCD system...
