us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Lenses » Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor

Testseek.com have collected 38 expert reviews of the Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor and the average rating is 68%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor .
 
(68%)
38 Reviews
Users
(98%)
42 Reviews
68 0 100 38

The editors liked

  • Vibration reduction system. Fixed aperture through zoom range. Sharp images. Fairly light.
  • Excellent image quality in the frame centre
  • Good image quality on the edge of the frame
  • Very good control of chromatic aberration
  • Slight distortion on the APSC/DX detector
  • Zero coma problems
  • Negligible astigmatism
  • Moderate vignetting
  • Silent and acc
  • Relatively slim and lightweight
  • Excellent performance
  • 4-stop optical stabilization

The editors didn't like

  • Tripod collar is an expensive add-on. Soft edges at 70mm
  • Slight spherical aberration at 200 mm
  • Work against bright light could have been better.
  • Lacks that f/2.8 aperture
  • As pricey as some 70-200mm f/2.8 zooms

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-12-11, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  We've now had the opportunity to assess the entry-level 24-Mpix Nikon D3200 with a wide range of lenses. We've analyzed a total of over 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality, and to discover which of those models perform...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(36%)
 
  Published: 2013-11-21, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following on from the lens recommendations for the earlier full-frame Nikon D600, we've now had the opportunity to assess a wide range lenses with that model's replacement, the 24-Mpix D610. We've analyzed a total of 95 Nikkor and third-party prime and zo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(54%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-24, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Following the recommendations for Nikon D7100, we've had the opportunity to assess another of the firm's 24-Mpix DX format cameras – the mid-range D5200 - with over 120 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find o...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-10, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  This is the third part in the series of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've analyzed nearly 46 Nikon and third-party telephoto prime and zoom models to assess their optical quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are the bes...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(42%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-02, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  This is part one of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've tested over 120 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are perform best when paired with Nikon's 24M-Pix A...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(42%)
 
  Published: 2013-07-15, Author: Jim , review by: pcmag.com

  • Vibration reduction system. Fixed aperture through zoom range. Sharp images. Fairly light.
  • Tripod collar is an expensive add-on. Soft edges at 70mm
  • The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR is the telezoom for Nikonians who can't handle the cost of the f/2.8 version of the lens....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-04, review by: lenstip.com

  • excellent image quality in the frame centre, good image quality on the edge of the frame, very good control of chromatic aberration, slight distortion on the APSC/DX detector, zero coma problems, negligible astigmatism, moderate vignetting, silent and acc
  • slight spherical aberration at 200 mm, work against bright light could have been better.
  • If you only compare the list of pros and cons you can already say that the Nikkor AF-S 70–200 mm f/4.0G ED VR is a very well-made lens indeed. The only thing that we don't like is its price. Recently it's dropped to a level below 5000 PLN but still it rem...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-07, Author: Julia , review by: popphoto.com

  • Abstract:  A long, stabilized Nikon zoom for much lessWhat's Hot: Great VR; pro quality in most respects. What's Not: Tripod collar not included. Who It's For: Nikonians who want an affordable 70–200mm stabilized zoom.Always on the lookout for exploitable market nic...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-04, review by: photographyblog.com

  • The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR is the company's most affordable telephoto lens for full-frame users who don't want to pay the substantial price premium for Nikon's faster f/2.8 zoom. It offers excellent performance across its versatile foca...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-09, review by: Slrgear.com

  • Abstract:  SLRgear Review January 9, 2013by Andrew Alexander The Nikon 70-200mm ƒ/4G ED VR AF-S was announced near the end of 2012. The lens is marketted as being smaller and lighter than its more expensive sibling. Designed as a full-frame lens, it offers ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×